A 20-Year Update on the Practice of Thoracic Surgery in Canada: A Survey of the Canadian Association of Thoracic Surgeons.

Q4 Medicine
Journal of Chest Surgery Pub Date : 2023-11-05 Epub Date: 2023-10-11 DOI:10.5090/jcs.23.093
Sami Aftab Abdul, Frances Wright, Christian Finley, Sebastien Gilbert, Andrew J E Seely, Sudhir Sundaresan, Patrick J Villeneuve, Donna E Maziak
{"title":"A 20-Year Update on the Practice of Thoracic Surgery in Canada: A Survey of the Canadian Association of Thoracic Surgeons.","authors":"Sami Aftab Abdul,&nbsp;Frances Wright,&nbsp;Christian Finley,&nbsp;Sebastien Gilbert,&nbsp;Andrew J E Seely,&nbsp;Sudhir Sundaresan,&nbsp;Patrick J Villeneuve,&nbsp;Donna E Maziak","doi":"10.5090/jcs.23.093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study provides an update to a landmark 2004 report describing demographics, training, and trends in adherence to thoracic surgery practice standards in Canada.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An updated questionnaire was administered to all members of the Canadian Association of Thoracic Surgeons via email (n=142, compared to n=68 in 2004). Our report incorporates internal data from Ontario Health and the Canadian Partnership Against Cancer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-eight surgeons completed the survey (male, 70.8%; mean±standard deviation age, 50.3±9.3 years). This represents a 33.8% response rate, compared to 64.7% in 2004. Most surgeons (69%) served a patient population of over 1 million per center; 32%-34% reported an on-call ratio of 1:4-1:5 days, and the average weekly hours worked was 56.4±11.9. Greater access to dedicated geographic units per center (73% in 2021 vs. 53% in 2004) has improved thoracic-associated services and house staff, notably endoscopy units (100% vs. 91%), with 73% of respondents having access to both endobronchial and endoscopic ultrasound. Access to thoracic radiology has also improved, particularly regarding positron emission tomography scanners per center (76.9% vs. 13%). Annual case volumes for lung (255 vs. 128), esophageal (41 vs. 19), and mediastinal resections (30 vs. 13), along with hiatal hernia repair (45 vs. 20), have increased substantially despite reports of operating room availability and radiology as rate-limiting steps.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This survey characterizes compliance with current practice standards, addressing the needs of thoracic surgeons across Canada. Over 85% of respondents were aware of the 2004 compliance paper, and 35% had applied for resources and equipment in response.</p>","PeriodicalId":34499,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chest Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10625961/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chest Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5090/jcs.23.093","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study provides an update to a landmark 2004 report describing demographics, training, and trends in adherence to thoracic surgery practice standards in Canada.

Methods: An updated questionnaire was administered to all members of the Canadian Association of Thoracic Surgeons via email (n=142, compared to n=68 in 2004). Our report incorporates internal data from Ontario Health and the Canadian Partnership Against Cancer.

Results: Forty-eight surgeons completed the survey (male, 70.8%; mean±standard deviation age, 50.3±9.3 years). This represents a 33.8% response rate, compared to 64.7% in 2004. Most surgeons (69%) served a patient population of over 1 million per center; 32%-34% reported an on-call ratio of 1:4-1:5 days, and the average weekly hours worked was 56.4±11.9. Greater access to dedicated geographic units per center (73% in 2021 vs. 53% in 2004) has improved thoracic-associated services and house staff, notably endoscopy units (100% vs. 91%), with 73% of respondents having access to both endobronchial and endoscopic ultrasound. Access to thoracic radiology has also improved, particularly regarding positron emission tomography scanners per center (76.9% vs. 13%). Annual case volumes for lung (255 vs. 128), esophageal (41 vs. 19), and mediastinal resections (30 vs. 13), along with hiatal hernia repair (45 vs. 20), have increased substantially despite reports of operating room availability and radiology as rate-limiting steps.

Conclusion: This survey characterizes compliance with current practice standards, addressing the needs of thoracic surgeons across Canada. Over 85% of respondents were aware of the 2004 compliance paper, and 35% had applied for resources and equipment in response.

Abstract Image

加拿大胸外科实践的20年更新:加拿大胸外科医师协会的调查。
背景:本研究对2004年一份具有里程碑意义的报告进行了更新,该报告描述了加拿大遵守胸外科实践标准的人口统计、培训和趋势。方法:通过电子邮件向加拿大胸外科医师协会的所有成员(n=142,而2004年为n=68)发放了一份更新的问卷。我们的报告纳入了安大略省卫生部和加拿大癌症合作组织的内部数据。结果:48名外科医生完成了调查(男性,70.8%;平均值±标准差年龄,50.3±9.3岁)。这意味着应答率为33.8%,而2004年为64.7%。大多数外科医生(69%)为每个中心超过100万的患者群体提供服务;32%至34%的人报告称,随叫随到的比例为1:4-1:5天,平均每周工作时间为56.4±11.9小时。每个中心更多地使用专用地理单元(2021年为73%,2004年为53%),改善了胸部相关服务和家庭工作人员,尤其是内窥镜检查单元(100%对91%),73%的受访者同时使用支气管内窥镜和内窥镜超声。获得胸部放射学的机会也有所改善,特别是每个中心的正电子发射断层扫描扫描仪(76.9%对13%)。肺切除术(255例对128例)、食道切除术(41例对19例)和纵隔切除术(30例对13例)以及裂孔疝修补术(45例对20例)的年病例数大幅增加,尽管有报道称手术室可用性和放射学是限制发病率的步骤。结论:这项调查符合当前的执业标准,满足了加拿大各地胸外科医生的需求。超过85%的受访者知道2004年的合规文件,35%的受访者申请了资源和设备作为回应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Chest Surgery
Journal of Chest Surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
76
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信