Perceptions of Competition-Based Learning After a Brief Experience at a National Surgical Meeting.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Surgical Innovation Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-13 DOI:10.1177/15533506231207438
Nicco Ruggiero, Joseph C L'Huillier, Nigel Marine, Owen Burns, Farrah Mawani, L T Muavé Sanders, Adam Abbas, Timothy M Adams, Byron F Santos, Yana R Wirengard, James Butch Rosser
{"title":"Perceptions of Competition-Based Learning After a Brief Experience at a National Surgical Meeting.","authors":"Nicco Ruggiero, Joseph C L'Huillier, Nigel Marine, Owen Burns, Farrah Mawani, L T Muavé Sanders, Adam Abbas, Timothy M Adams, Byron F Santos, Yana R Wirengard, James Butch Rosser","doi":"10.1177/15533506231207438","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Competition-based learning (CBL) facilitates learning through competitions. At the 2022 & 2023 Annual SAGES meetings, we evaluated a CBL experience (TOP GUN Shootout) developed from a modified version of the previously validated TOP GUN Laparoscopic Skills and Suturing Program. The project sought to evaluate the TOP GUN Shootout's (TGS) ability to enhance participant engagement in pursuit of laparoscopic surgical skills.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants competed in the TGS. Their scores (time and errors) were recorded for: Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery Peg Pass, Cup Drop Task, and Intracorporeal Suturing. All participants completed a 10-question satisfaction survey on a 7-point Likert scale, with questions assessing 3 domains: (1) capability/confidence in MIS skill performance prior to the competition; (2) applicability and satisfaction with TGS's capacity to develop MIS skills; and (3) interest in seeking additional MIS training and appropriateness of CBL in MIS training. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate these areas.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 121 participants completed the TGS, of whom 84 (69%) completed the satisfaction survey. The average age was 32.9 years, 67% were males. On average (+/- SD), participant satisfaction was 5.04 (+/- 2.08) for Domain 1, 6.20 (+/- 1.28) for Domain 2, and 6.58 (+/- .95) for Domain 3.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Participants described an overall lack of confidence in their MIS skills prior to the 2022-2023 Annual SAGES conference. Participants felt that this brief CBL experience, aided in the development of their MIS skills. Furthermore, this brief CBL experience may inspire learners to seek out further training of their MIS skills.</p>","PeriodicalId":22095,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Innovation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15533506231207438","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Competition-based learning (CBL) facilitates learning through competitions. At the 2022 & 2023 Annual SAGES meetings, we evaluated a CBL experience (TOP GUN Shootout) developed from a modified version of the previously validated TOP GUN Laparoscopic Skills and Suturing Program. The project sought to evaluate the TOP GUN Shootout's (TGS) ability to enhance participant engagement in pursuit of laparoscopic surgical skills.

Methods: Participants competed in the TGS. Their scores (time and errors) were recorded for: Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery Peg Pass, Cup Drop Task, and Intracorporeal Suturing. All participants completed a 10-question satisfaction survey on a 7-point Likert scale, with questions assessing 3 domains: (1) capability/confidence in MIS skill performance prior to the competition; (2) applicability and satisfaction with TGS's capacity to develop MIS skills; and (3) interest in seeking additional MIS training and appropriateness of CBL in MIS training. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate these areas.

Results: Overall, 121 participants completed the TGS, of whom 84 (69%) completed the satisfaction survey. The average age was 32.9 years, 67% were males. On average (+/- SD), participant satisfaction was 5.04 (+/- 2.08) for Domain 1, 6.20 (+/- 1.28) for Domain 2, and 6.58 (+/- .95) for Domain 3.

Conclusion: Participants described an overall lack of confidence in their MIS skills prior to the 2022-2023 Annual SAGES conference. Participants felt that this brief CBL experience, aided in the development of their MIS skills. Furthermore, this brief CBL experience may inspire learners to seek out further training of their MIS skills.

在一次全国外科会议上的简短经历后,对基于竞争的学习的看法。
背景:基于竞争的学习(CBL)促进了通过竞争进行学习。在2022年和2023年SAGES年度会议上,我们评估了一项CBL体验(TOP GUN Shootout),该体验是根据之前验证的TOP GUN腹腔镜技能和缝合计划的修改版本开发的。该项目旨在评估TOP GUN Shootout(TGS)在提高参与者参与腹腔镜手术技能方面的能力。方法:参与者参加TGS比赛。他们的得分(时间和错误)记录为:腹腔镜手术基本功Peg Pass、Cup Drop Task和体内缝合。所有参与者都完成了一项7分Likert量表的10个问题的满意度调查,问题评估了3个领域:(1)比赛前MIS技能表现的能力/信心;(2) TGS开发MIS技能的能力的适用性和满意度;以及(3)寻求额外MIS培训的兴趣以及CBL在MIS培训中的适当性。描述性统计被用来评估这些领域。结果:总体而言,121名参与者完成了TGS,其中84人(69%)完成了满意度调查。平均年龄32.9岁,67%为男性。平均而言(+/-SD),参与者对领域1的满意度为5.04(+/-2.08),领域2的满意度为6.20(+/-1.28),领域3的满意度为6.58(+/-.95)。结论:在2022-2023年SAGES年度会议之前,参与者对自己的MIS技能总体缺乏信心。参与者认为,这段短暂的CBL经历有助于他们MIS技能的发展。此外,这段短暂的CBL经历可能会激励学习者寻求进一步的MIS技能培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Surgical Innovation
Surgical Innovation 医学-外科
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Surgical Innovation (SRI) is a peer-reviewed bi-monthly journal focusing on minimally invasive surgical techniques, new instruments such as laparoscopes and endoscopes, and new technologies. SRI prepares surgeons to think and work in "the operating room of the future" through learning new techniques, understanding and adapting to new technologies, maintaining surgical competencies, and applying surgical outcomes data to their practices. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信