Polymyxin B-immobilised fibre column treatment for acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis patients with mechanical ventilation: a nationwide observational study.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Nobuyasu Awano, Taisuke Jo, Takehiro Izumo, Minoru Inomata, Yu Ito, Kojiro Morita, Hiroki Matsui, Kiyohide Fushimi, Hirokazu Urushiyama, Takahide Nagase, Hideo Yasunaga
{"title":"Polymyxin B-immobilised fibre column treatment for acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis patients with mechanical ventilation: a nationwide observational study.","authors":"Nobuyasu Awano, Taisuke Jo, Takehiro Izumo, Minoru Inomata, Yu Ito, Kojiro Morita, Hiroki Matsui, Kiyohide Fushimi, Hirokazu Urushiyama, Takahide Nagase, Hideo Yasunaga","doi":"10.1186/s40560-023-00693-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The prognosis for acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (AE-IPF) is poor, and there is no established treatment. Hence, we aimed to investigate the effectiveness of a polymyxin B-immobilised fibre column (PMX) for the treatment of AE-IPF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were retrospectively collected from the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination database from 1 July 2010 to 31 March 2018. We identified adult patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis who received high-dose methylprednisolone (mPSL) therapy and mechanical ventilation upon admission. Eligible patients (n = 5616) were divided into those receiving PMX treatment combined with high-dose mPSL (PMX group, n = 199) and high-dose mPSL alone (mPSL alone group, n = 5417). To compare outcomes between the two groups, we applied a stabilised inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using propensity scores. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality, and the secondary outcomes were 14- and 28-day mortality and length of hospital stay.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The in-hospital mortality rates of the PMX and mPSL alone groups were 79.9% and 76.4%, respectively. The results did not significantly differ between the two groups after performing a stabilised IPTW. The odds ratio of the PMX group compared with the mPSL alone group was 1.56 (95% confidence interval 0.80-3.06; p = 0.19). The 14- and 28-day mortality and length of hospital stay (secondary outcomes) also did not significantly differ between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In AE-IPF patients using mechanical ventilation, the treatment outcome was not significantly better for PMX combined with high-dose mPSL than for high-dose mPSL alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":16123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intensive Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10568810/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40560-023-00693-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The prognosis for acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (AE-IPF) is poor, and there is no established treatment. Hence, we aimed to investigate the effectiveness of a polymyxin B-immobilised fibre column (PMX) for the treatment of AE-IPF.

Methods: Data were retrospectively collected from the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination database from 1 July 2010 to 31 March 2018. We identified adult patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis who received high-dose methylprednisolone (mPSL) therapy and mechanical ventilation upon admission. Eligible patients (n = 5616) were divided into those receiving PMX treatment combined with high-dose mPSL (PMX group, n = 199) and high-dose mPSL alone (mPSL alone group, n = 5417). To compare outcomes between the two groups, we applied a stabilised inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using propensity scores. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality, and the secondary outcomes were 14- and 28-day mortality and length of hospital stay.

Results: The in-hospital mortality rates of the PMX and mPSL alone groups were 79.9% and 76.4%, respectively. The results did not significantly differ between the two groups after performing a stabilised IPTW. The odds ratio of the PMX group compared with the mPSL alone group was 1.56 (95% confidence interval 0.80-3.06; p = 0.19). The 14- and 28-day mortality and length of hospital stay (secondary outcomes) also did not significantly differ between the two groups.

Conclusions: In AE-IPF patients using mechanical ventilation, the treatment outcome was not significantly better for PMX combined with high-dose mPSL than for high-dose mPSL alone.

Abstract Image

多粘菌素B固定纤维柱治疗机械通气下特发性肺纤维化患者急性加重期:一项全国性观察性研究。
背景:特发性肺纤维化急性加重期(AE-IPF)的预后较差,目前尚无确定的治疗方法。因此,我们旨在研究多粘菌素B固定纤维柱(PMX)治疗AE-IPF的有效性。方法:回顾性收集2010年7月1日至2018年3月31日日本诊断程序组合数据库中的数据。我们确定了患有特发性肺纤维化的成年患者,他们在入院时接受了高剂量甲基强的松龙(mPSL)治疗和机械通气。符合条件的患者(n = 5616)分为接受PMX治疗联合高剂量mPSL的组(PMX组 = 199)和单独高剂量mPSL(单独mPSL组 = 5417)。为了比较两组之间的结果,我们使用倾向评分应用了稳定的治疗加权逆概率(IPTW)。主要结果是住院死亡率,次要结果是14天和28天的死亡率和住院时间。结果:PMX组和mPSL组的住院死亡率分别为79.9%和76.4%。在进行稳定的IPTW后,两组之间的结果没有显著差异。PMX组与单独mPSL组的比值比为1.56(95%置信区间0.80-3.06;p = 0.19)。14天和28天的死亡率和住院时间(次要结果)在两组之间也没有显著差异。结论:在使用机械通气的AE-IPF患者中,PMX联合高剂量mPSL的治疗结果并不明显优于单独使用高剂量mPSL。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Intensive Care
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine-Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
1.40%
发文量
51
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: "Journal of Intensive Care" is an open access journal dedicated to the comprehensive coverage of intensive care medicine, providing a platform for the latest research and clinical insights in this critical field. The journal covers a wide range of topics, including intensive and critical care, trauma and surgical intensive care, pediatric intensive care, acute and emergency medicine, perioperative medicine, resuscitation, infection control, and organ dysfunction. Recognizing the importance of cultural diversity in healthcare practices, "Journal of Intensive Care" also encourages submissions that explore and discuss the cultural aspects of intensive care, aiming to promote a more inclusive and culturally sensitive approach to patient care. By fostering a global exchange of knowledge and expertise, the journal contributes to the continuous improvement of intensive care practices worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信