WORDS: A New Verbal Memory Test to Evaluate Cognitive Health in a Zambian School-aged Population.

Q3 Medicine
Innovations in clinical neuroscience Pub Date : 2023-09-01 eCollection Date: 2023-07-01
Franco Di Cesare, Giulia Piccinini, Cristiana Di Carlo, Leonardo Di Cesare
{"title":"WORDS: A New Verbal Memory Test to Evaluate Cognitive Health in a Zambian School-aged Population.","authors":"Franco Di Cesare,&nbsp;Giulia Piccinini,&nbsp;Cristiana Di Carlo,&nbsp;Leonardo Di Cesare","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The paucity of psychometric instruments is one of the challenges preventing the effective implementation of child cognitive health testing in Sub-Saharan countries. WORDS is a new memory assessment tool originally validated in a Zambian school-aged population.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>WORDS involves the standardized administration of a multitrial, verbal, free recall task with acquisition and immediate recall of a structured list of 16 words, followed by a second acquisition and delayed recall after a five-minute interference. A field trial was carried out to evaluate test feasibility of use, reliability, and validity. A total of 448 children, aged 5 to 17 years, were recruited at multiple Zambian clinical sites and schools.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>WORDS provides a summary score of recall productivity derived from the sum of items correctly retrieved at immediate and delayed recalls. Recall productivity showed a moderate/good reliability at test-retest with alternate forms (N=53, 95% confidence interval of the intraclass correlation [CI-IC]: 0.73, 0.54-0.85). Recall productivity was found to increase with age. Altered memory functioning, as indicated by lower recall productivity, was associated with poor health status resulting from chronic neurologic or medical disease or prolonged exposure to psychosocial stress and deprivation [recall productivity, range: 0-32, healthy mean (standard deviation [SD]): 15.36 (4.7) vs. poor health, mean (SD): 12.62 (4.8); <i>F</i> (1,446)=27.79, <i>p</i>=0.000, <i>d</i>=0.58].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>WORDS addresses the need for new psychometric tools to evaluate memory in a school-aged Zambian population. WORDS has the potential for clinical utility to evaluate cognitive development, as well as the effect of different health conditions on memory. Study results warrant research to further validate its use in Sub-Saharan clinical and epidemiological research settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":13635,"journal":{"name":"Innovations in clinical neuroscience","volume":"20 7-9","pages":"11-17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10561980/pdf/icns_20_7-9_11.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovations in clinical neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The paucity of psychometric instruments is one of the challenges preventing the effective implementation of child cognitive health testing in Sub-Saharan countries. WORDS is a new memory assessment tool originally validated in a Zambian school-aged population.

Design: WORDS involves the standardized administration of a multitrial, verbal, free recall task with acquisition and immediate recall of a structured list of 16 words, followed by a second acquisition and delayed recall after a five-minute interference. A field trial was carried out to evaluate test feasibility of use, reliability, and validity. A total of 448 children, aged 5 to 17 years, were recruited at multiple Zambian clinical sites and schools.

Results: WORDS provides a summary score of recall productivity derived from the sum of items correctly retrieved at immediate and delayed recalls. Recall productivity showed a moderate/good reliability at test-retest with alternate forms (N=53, 95% confidence interval of the intraclass correlation [CI-IC]: 0.73, 0.54-0.85). Recall productivity was found to increase with age. Altered memory functioning, as indicated by lower recall productivity, was associated with poor health status resulting from chronic neurologic or medical disease or prolonged exposure to psychosocial stress and deprivation [recall productivity, range: 0-32, healthy mean (standard deviation [SD]): 15.36 (4.7) vs. poor health, mean (SD): 12.62 (4.8); F (1,446)=27.79, p=0.000, d=0.58].

Conclusion: WORDS addresses the need for new psychometric tools to evaluate memory in a school-aged Zambian population. WORDS has the potential for clinical utility to evaluate cognitive development, as well as the effect of different health conditions on memory. Study results warrant research to further validate its use in Sub-Saharan clinical and epidemiological research settings.

词语:一项新的言语记忆测试,用于评估赞比亚学龄人群的认知健康状况。
目标:缺乏心理测量仪器是阻碍撒哈拉以南国家有效实施儿童认知健康测试的挑战之一。WORDS是一种新的记忆评估工具,最初在赞比亚学龄人群中得到验证。设计:WORDS涉及多试验、口头、自由回忆任务的标准化管理,包括获取和立即回忆16个单词的结构化列表,然后在5分钟的干扰后进行第二次获取和延迟回忆。进行了现场试验,以评估测试的使用可行性、可靠性和有效性。赞比亚多个临床机构和学校共招募了448名5至17岁的儿童。结果:WORDS提供了召回生产率的汇总得分,该得分来源于即时和延迟召回时正确检索的项目的总和。在使用替代形式的重测中,回忆生产力显示出中等/良好的可靠性(N=53,组内相关性[CI-IC]的95%置信区间:0.73,0.54-0.85)。回忆生产力随着年龄的增长而增加。记忆功能的改变,如较低的回忆生产力所示,与慢性神经或医学疾病或长期暴露于心理社会压力和剥夺导致的健康状况不佳有关[回忆生产力,范围:0-32,健康平均值(标准差[SD]):15.36(4.7)vs.健康状况不佳,平均值(SD):12.62(4.8);F(1446)=27.79,p=0.000,d=0.58]。结论:WORDS解决了对新的心理测量工具的需求,以评估赞比亚学龄人口的记忆。WORDS在评估认知发展以及不同健康状况对记忆的影响方面具有潜在的临床实用性。研究结果值得进一步验证其在撒哈拉以南临床和流行病学研究环境中的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Innovations in clinical neuroscience
Innovations in clinical neuroscience Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
87
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信