Enhancing the Value of Large-Enrollment Course Evaluation Data Using Sentiment Analysis

IF 2.5 3区 教育学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Benjamin B. Hoar, Roshini Ramachandran, Marc Levis-Fitzgerald, Erin M. Sparck, Ke Wu and Chong Liu*, 
{"title":"Enhancing the Value of Large-Enrollment Course Evaluation Data Using Sentiment Analysis","authors":"Benjamin B. Hoar,&nbsp;Roshini Ramachandran,&nbsp;Marc Levis-Fitzgerald,&nbsp;Erin M. Sparck,&nbsp;Ke Wu and Chong Liu*,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00258","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >In education, space exists for a tool that valorizes generic student course evaluation formats by organizing and recapitulating students’ views on the pedagogical practices to which they are exposed. Often, student opinions about a course are gathered using a general comment section that does not solicit feedback concerning specific course components. Herein, we show a novel approach to summarizing and organizing students’ opinions as a function of the language used in their course evaluations, specifically focusing on developing software that outputs actionable, specific feedback about course components in large-enrollment STEM contexts. Our approach augments existing course review formats, which rely heavily on unstructured text data, with a tool built from Python, LaTeX, and Google’s Natural Language API. The result is quantitative, summative sentiment analysis reports that have general and component-specific sections, aiming to address some of the challenges faced by educators when teaching large physical science courses.</p>","PeriodicalId":43,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chemical Education","volume":"100 10","pages":"4085–4091"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chemical Education","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00258","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In education, space exists for a tool that valorizes generic student course evaluation formats by organizing and recapitulating students’ views on the pedagogical practices to which they are exposed. Often, student opinions about a course are gathered using a general comment section that does not solicit feedback concerning specific course components. Herein, we show a novel approach to summarizing and organizing students’ opinions as a function of the language used in their course evaluations, specifically focusing on developing software that outputs actionable, specific feedback about course components in large-enrollment STEM contexts. Our approach augments existing course review formats, which rely heavily on unstructured text data, with a tool built from Python, LaTeX, and Google’s Natural Language API. The result is quantitative, summative sentiment analysis reports that have general and component-specific sections, aiming to address some of the challenges faced by educators when teaching large physical science courses.

Abstract Image

使用情绪分析提高大型招生课程评估数据的价值
在教育中,存在一种工具的空间,该工具通过组织和重述学生对他们所接触的教学实践的看法,来评估通用的学生课程评估格式。通常,学生对课程的意见是通过一般评论部分收集的,该部分不征求有关特定课程组成部分的反馈。在此,我们展示了一种新的方法,根据学生在课程评估中使用的语言来总结和组织学生的意见,特别是专注于开发软件,在大规模招生的STEM环境中输出关于课程组成部分的可操作的、具体的反馈。我们的方法使用Python、LaTeX和Google的自然语言API构建的工具,增强了严重依赖非结构化文本数据的现有课程审查格式。其结果是定量的、总结性的情绪分析报告,分为一般部分和特定部分,旨在解决教育工作者在教授大型物理科学课程时面临的一些挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Chemical Education
Journal of Chemical Education 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
50.00%
发文量
465
审稿时长
6.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Chemical Education is the official journal of the Division of Chemical Education of the American Chemical Society, co-published with the American Chemical Society Publications Division. Launched in 1924, the Journal of Chemical Education is the world’s premier chemical education journal. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed articles and related information as a resource to those in the field of chemical education and to those institutions that serve them. JCE typically addresses chemical content, activities, laboratory experiments, instructional methods, and pedagogies. The Journal serves as a means of communication among people across the world who are interested in the teaching and learning of chemistry. This includes instructors of chemistry from middle school through graduate school, professional staff who support these teaching activities, as well as some scientists in commerce, industry, and government.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信