The efficacy and efficiency of percutaneous lidocaine injection for minimizing the carotid reflex in carotid artery stenting: A single-center retrospective study.

Hyung Kyu Lee, Tae Joon Park, Sang Pyung Lee, Jin Wook Baek, Seong Hwan Kim, Aiden Ryou
{"title":"The efficacy and efficiency of percutaneous lidocaine injection for minimizing the carotid reflex in carotid artery stenting: A single-center retrospective study.","authors":"Hyung Kyu Lee, Tae Joon Park, Sang Pyung Lee, Jin Wook Baek, Seong Hwan Kim, Aiden Ryou","doi":"10.7461/jcen.2023.E2023.06.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess whether local anesthetic infiltration could minimize the carotid baroreceptor reflex (CBR) which has an incidence after carotid artery stenting (CAS) that varies from 29% to 51%.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective single-center study included 51 patients (mean age, 70.47 years) who underwent CAS for carotid stenosis. The groups included patients who underwent CAS for asymptomatic ischemic stroke (n=41) or symptomatic disease (n=10). Preprocedural percutaneous lidocaine injections (PPLIs) were administered to 70.6% and 5.9% of patients who underwent elective CAS and emergency CAS, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among patients who received PPLIs, the mean degree of stenosis was 80.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: ±10.74, 51-98%). The mean distance from the common carotid artery bifurcation to the most stenotic lesion (CSD) was 8.3 mm (95% CI: ±0.97, 6.3-10.2 mm); the mean angle between the internal carotid artery and common carotid artery (CCA) trunk (IAG) was 65.6° (95% CI: ±2.39, 61-70°). Among patients who did not receive PPLIs, the mean degree of stenosis was 84.0% (95% CI: ±8.96, 70-99%). The mean CSD was 5.9 mm (95% CI: ±1.83, 1.9-9.9 mm); the mean IAG was 60.4° (95% CI: ±4.41, 51-70°). The procedure time was longer in the PPLI group than in the no PPLI group (28.19 [n=39] vs. 18.88 [n=12] days) (P=0.057); the length of intensive care unit stay was shorter in the PPLI group (20.01 [n=36] vs. 28.10 [n=5] days) (P=0.132).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Targeted PPLI administration to the carotid bulb decreased aberrant heart rates and blood pressure changes induced by carotid stent deployment and balloon inflation. As CBR sensitivity increases with decreasing distance to the stenotic lesion from the CCA bifurcation, PPLIs may help stabilize patients during procedures for stenotic lesions closer to the CCA.</p>","PeriodicalId":94072,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cerebrovascular and endovascular neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"130-140"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11220294/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cerebrovascular and endovascular neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7461/jcen.2023.E2023.06.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess whether local anesthetic infiltration could minimize the carotid baroreceptor reflex (CBR) which has an incidence after carotid artery stenting (CAS) that varies from 29% to 51%.

Methods: This retrospective single-center study included 51 patients (mean age, 70.47 years) who underwent CAS for carotid stenosis. The groups included patients who underwent CAS for asymptomatic ischemic stroke (n=41) or symptomatic disease (n=10). Preprocedural percutaneous lidocaine injections (PPLIs) were administered to 70.6% and 5.9% of patients who underwent elective CAS and emergency CAS, respectively.

Results: Among patients who received PPLIs, the mean degree of stenosis was 80.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: ±10.74, 51-98%). The mean distance from the common carotid artery bifurcation to the most stenotic lesion (CSD) was 8.3 mm (95% CI: ±0.97, 6.3-10.2 mm); the mean angle between the internal carotid artery and common carotid artery (CCA) trunk (IAG) was 65.6° (95% CI: ±2.39, 61-70°). Among patients who did not receive PPLIs, the mean degree of stenosis was 84.0% (95% CI: ±8.96, 70-99%). The mean CSD was 5.9 mm (95% CI: ±1.83, 1.9-9.9 mm); the mean IAG was 60.4° (95% CI: ±4.41, 51-70°). The procedure time was longer in the PPLI group than in the no PPLI group (28.19 [n=39] vs. 18.88 [n=12] days) (P=0.057); the length of intensive care unit stay was shorter in the PPLI group (20.01 [n=36] vs. 28.10 [n=5] days) (P=0.132).

Conclusions: Targeted PPLI administration to the carotid bulb decreased aberrant heart rates and blood pressure changes induced by carotid stent deployment and balloon inflation. As CBR sensitivity increases with decreasing distance to the stenotic lesion from the CCA bifurcation, PPLIs may help stabilize patients during procedures for stenotic lesions closer to the CCA.

经皮利多卡因注射在颈动脉支架置入术中减少颈动脉反射的疗效和效率:一项单中心回顾性研究。
目的:评估局部麻醉浸润是否能最大限度地减少颈动脉压力感受器反射(CBR),该反射在颈动脉支架术(CAS)后的发生率为29%至51%。这些组包括因无症状缺血性中风(n=41)或有症状疾病(n=10)而接受CAS的患者。分别对70.6%和5.9%接受选择性CAS和急诊CAS的患者进行硬膜前经皮利多卡因注射(PPLI)。结果:在接受PPLI的患者中,平均狭窄程度为80.5%(95%置信区间[CI]:±10.74,51-98%)。从颈总动脉分叉到最狭窄病变(CSD)的平均距离为8.3mm(95%CI:±0.97,6.3-10.2mm);颈内动脉与颈总动脉(CCA)干(IAG)的平均夹角为65.6°(95%CI:±2.39、61-70°)。在未接受PPLI的患者中,平均狭窄程度为84.0%(95%CI:±8.96,70-99%)。平均CSD为5.9mm(95%可信区间:±1.83,1.9-9.9mm);平均IAG为60.4°(95%可信区间:±4.41,51-70°)。PPLI组的手术时间长于无PPLI组(28.19[n=39]vs.18.88[n=12]天)(P=0.057);PPLI组的重症监护室住院时间较短(20.01[n=36]vs.28.10[n=5]天)(P=0.132)。由于CBR敏感性随着从CCA分叉到狭窄病变的距离的减小而增加,PPLI可能有助于在靠近CCA的狭窄病变的手术过程中稳定患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信