Patient Outcomes After Robotic Ventral Rectopexy With Sacrocolpopexy.

IF 0.8 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.) Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-22 DOI:10.1097/SPV.0000000000001412
James H Ross, Meng Yao, Shannon L Wallace, Marie Fidela R Paraiso, Sarah A Vogler, Katie Propst, Cecile A Ferrando
{"title":"Patient Outcomes After Robotic Ventral Rectopexy With Sacrocolpopexy.","authors":"James H Ross, Meng Yao, Shannon L Wallace, Marie Fidela R Paraiso, Sarah A Vogler, Katie Propst, Cecile A Ferrando","doi":"10.1097/SPV.0000000000001412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>As few studies exist examining postoperative functional outcomes in patients undergoing robotic sacrocolpopexy and ventral rectopexy, results from this study can help guide surgeons in counseling patients on their outcomes.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of the study was to evaluate functional outcomes and overall postoperative satisfaction as measured by the Pelvic Floor Disability Index 20 (PFDI-20), Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12), and Patient Global Impression of Improvement Scale (PGI-I) in patients who underwent combined robotic ventral rectopexy and sacrocolpopexy for concomitant pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and rectal prolapse or intussusception (RP/I).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort and survey study of patients with combined POP and RP/I who underwent the previously mentioned surgical repair between January 2018 and July 2021. Each patient was contacted to participate in a survey evaluating postoperative symptoms related bother, sexual function, and overall satisfaction using the PFDI-20, PISQ-12, and PGI-I.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 107 patients met study inclusion criteria with 67 patients completing the surveys. The mean age and body mass index were 63.7 ± 11.5 years and 25.0 ± 5.4, respectively. Of the patients, 19% had a prior RP repair and 23% had a prior POP repair. Rectal prolapse or intussusception recurrence was reported in 10.4% of patients and objective POP recurrence was found in 7.5% of patients. Sixty-seven patients (62%) completed the surveys. The median time to survey follow-up was 18 (8.8-51.8) months. At the time of survey, the mean PFDI-20 score was 95.7 ± 53.7. The mean PISQ-12 score for all patients was 32.8 ± 7.2 and the median PGI-I score was 2.0 (interquartile range, 1.0-3.0).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this cohort of patients who underwent a combined robotic ventral rectopexy and sacrocolpopexy, patient-reported postoperative symptom bother was low, sexual function was high, and their overall condition was much improved.</p>","PeriodicalId":75288,"journal":{"name":"Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000001412","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: As few studies exist examining postoperative functional outcomes in patients undergoing robotic sacrocolpopexy and ventral rectopexy, results from this study can help guide surgeons in counseling patients on their outcomes.

Objective: The aim of the study was to evaluate functional outcomes and overall postoperative satisfaction as measured by the Pelvic Floor Disability Index 20 (PFDI-20), Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12), and Patient Global Impression of Improvement Scale (PGI-I) in patients who underwent combined robotic ventral rectopexy and sacrocolpopexy for concomitant pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and rectal prolapse or intussusception (RP/I).

Methods: This was a retrospective cohort and survey study of patients with combined POP and RP/I who underwent the previously mentioned surgical repair between January 2018 and July 2021. Each patient was contacted to participate in a survey evaluating postoperative symptoms related bother, sexual function, and overall satisfaction using the PFDI-20, PISQ-12, and PGI-I.

Results: A total of 107 patients met study inclusion criteria with 67 patients completing the surveys. The mean age and body mass index were 63.7 ± 11.5 years and 25.0 ± 5.4, respectively. Of the patients, 19% had a prior RP repair and 23% had a prior POP repair. Rectal prolapse or intussusception recurrence was reported in 10.4% of patients and objective POP recurrence was found in 7.5% of patients. Sixty-seven patients (62%) completed the surveys. The median time to survey follow-up was 18 (8.8-51.8) months. At the time of survey, the mean PFDI-20 score was 95.7 ± 53.7. The mean PISQ-12 score for all patients was 32.8 ± 7.2 and the median PGI-I score was 2.0 (interquartile range, 1.0-3.0).

Conclusions: In this cohort of patients who underwent a combined robotic ventral rectopexy and sacrocolpopexy, patient-reported postoperative symptom bother was low, sexual function was high, and their overall condition was much improved.

Sacrocolpopexy机器人腹侧直肠固定术后的患者结局。
重要性:由于很少有研究检查接受机器人骶管切除术和腹侧直肠固定术的患者的术后功能结果,这项研究的结果可以帮助指导外科医生就其结果向患者提供咨询。目的:本研究的目的是通过盆底功能障碍指数20(PFDI-20)、盆腔器官脱垂/尿失禁性问卷(PISQ-12)、,和患者整体改善印象量表(PGI-I),这些患者因合并盆腔器官脱垂(POP)和直肠脱垂或肠套叠(RP/I)而接受机器人腹侧直肠固定术和骶管切除术2018年和2021年7月。联系每位患者参与一项调查,使用PFDI-20、PISQ-12和PGI-I评估术后症状相关的困扰、性功能和总体满意度。结果:共有107名患者符合研究纳入标准,67名患者完成了调查。平均年龄和体重指数分别为63.7±11.5岁和25.0±5.4。在这些患者中,19%的患者有RP修复,23%的患者有POP修复。10.4%的患者报告直肠脱垂或肠套叠复发,7.5%的患者发现客观POP复发。67名患者(62%)完成了调查。调查随访的中位时间为18个月(8.8-51.8)。在调查时,PFDI-20的平均得分为95.7±53.7。所有患者的平均PISQ-12评分为32.8±7.2,中位数PGI-I评分为2.0(四分位间距,1.0-3.0)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信