Postacute Sequelae of COVID-19 and Adverse Psychiatric Outcomes: Protocol for an Etiology and Risk Systematic Review.

JMIRx med Pub Date : 2023-03-14 DOI:10.2196/43880
Andem Effiong
{"title":"Postacute Sequelae of COVID-19 and Adverse Psychiatric Outcomes: Protocol for an Etiology and Risk Systematic Review.","authors":"Andem Effiong","doi":"10.2196/43880","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The postacute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC) is a syndrome characterized by persistent COVID-19 symptoms or the onset of new symptoms following recovery from the initial or acute phase of the illness. Such symptoms often occur 4 or more weeks after being diagnosed with COVID-19. Although a lot of work has gone into understanding the long-term mental health effects of PASC, many questions related to the etiology and risk of this condition remain.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This protocol is for a systematic review assessing the association between PASC and adverse psychiatric outcomes and whether people with PASC are at greater risk of developing an adverse psychiatric outcome than those without PASC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Various medical literature databases (eg, PubMed and EMBASE) will be searched for eligible articles, using predefined search criteria. Gray literature will also be explored. Epidemiological observational studies and secondary analyses of randomized controlled trials that report a quantitative relationship between PASC and at least one adverse psychiatric outcome will be included. The Population, Exposure of interest, Comparator, and Outcome framework will be used as a standardized framework for the inclusion criteria. The Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools will be used to assess methodological quality and critically appraise the risk of bias in included studies. A random-effects meta-analysis will be conducted if possible. A formal narrative synthesis will be performed if a meta-analysis is impossible due to substantial heterogeneity across studies. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach will be used to rate the cumulative certainty of the evidence for all outcomes. Ethical approval is not required. The study results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study documents and addresses etiology, risk factors, and long-term symptoms of COVID-19 among people with PASC. It focuses on a key priority area for new evidence syntheses on the clinical management of COVID-19 and pandemic-related conditions. It will include evidence on nonhospitalized and hospitalized patients with a history of PASC.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Substantial heterogeneity across studies may limit the ability to perform a meta-analysis. Findings will inform disease prevention, decision-making, health care policy, and clinical research (Reviewed by the Plan P #PeerRef Community).</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD42022308737; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=308737.</p>","PeriodicalId":73558,"journal":{"name":"JMIRx med","volume":"4 ","pages":"e43880"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10414129/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIRx med","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/43880","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The postacute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC) is a syndrome characterized by persistent COVID-19 symptoms or the onset of new symptoms following recovery from the initial or acute phase of the illness. Such symptoms often occur 4 or more weeks after being diagnosed with COVID-19. Although a lot of work has gone into understanding the long-term mental health effects of PASC, many questions related to the etiology and risk of this condition remain.

Objective: This protocol is for a systematic review assessing the association between PASC and adverse psychiatric outcomes and whether people with PASC are at greater risk of developing an adverse psychiatric outcome than those without PASC.

Methods: Various medical literature databases (eg, PubMed and EMBASE) will be searched for eligible articles, using predefined search criteria. Gray literature will also be explored. Epidemiological observational studies and secondary analyses of randomized controlled trials that report a quantitative relationship between PASC and at least one adverse psychiatric outcome will be included. The Population, Exposure of interest, Comparator, and Outcome framework will be used as a standardized framework for the inclusion criteria. The Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools will be used to assess methodological quality and critically appraise the risk of bias in included studies. A random-effects meta-analysis will be conducted if possible. A formal narrative synthesis will be performed if a meta-analysis is impossible due to substantial heterogeneity across studies. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach will be used to rate the cumulative certainty of the evidence for all outcomes. Ethical approval is not required. The study results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.

Results: This study documents and addresses etiology, risk factors, and long-term symptoms of COVID-19 among people with PASC. It focuses on a key priority area for new evidence syntheses on the clinical management of COVID-19 and pandemic-related conditions. It will include evidence on nonhospitalized and hospitalized patients with a history of PASC.

Conclusions: Substantial heterogeneity across studies may limit the ability to perform a meta-analysis. Findings will inform disease prevention, decision-making, health care policy, and clinical research (Reviewed by the Plan P #PeerRef Community).

Trial registration: PROSPERO CRD42022308737; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=308737.

新冠肺炎急性后遗症和精神病不良后果:病因和风险系统评价方案。
背景:新冠肺炎急性后后遗症(PASC)是一种综合征,其特征是持续的新冠肺炎症状或从疾病的初始或急性期恢复后出现新症状。此类症状通常发生在被诊断为新冠肺炎后4周或更长时间。尽管在了解PASC对心理健康的长期影响方面已经做了大量工作,但与这种疾病的病因和风险相关的许多问题仍然存在。目的:本方案旨在对PASC与不良精神结果之间的关系进行系统审查,并评估患有PASC的人是否比没有PASC的患者更容易出现不良精神结果。方法:使用预定义的搜索标准,在各种医学文献数据库(如PubMed和EMBASE)中搜索符合条件的文章。灰色文学也将被探索。将包括流行病学观察性研究和随机对照试验的二次分析,这些研究报告了PASC与至少一种不良精神结果之间的定量关系。人口、感兴趣的暴露、比较和结果框架将被用作纳入标准的标准化框架。乔安娜·布里格斯研究所的批判性评估工具将用于评估方法质量,并批判性评估纳入研究中的偏见风险。如果可能,将进行随机效应荟萃分析。如果由于研究之间的巨大异质性而无法进行荟萃分析,则将进行正式的叙述综合。建议分级评估、制定和评估方法将用于对所有结果的证据的累积确定性进行评级。不需要伦理批准。研究结果将发表在同行评审期刊上。结果:本研究记录并解决了PASC患者中新冠肺炎的病因、危险因素和长期症状。它专注于新冠肺炎临床管理和流行病相关疾病新证据综合的一个关键优先领域。它将包括有PASC病史的非住院和住院患者的证据。结论:研究之间的巨大异质性可能会限制进行荟萃分析的能力。研究结果将为疾病预防、决策、医疗保健政策和临床研究提供信息(由P#PeerRef社区计划审查)。试验注册:PROSPERO CRD42022308737;https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=308737.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信