Outcomes of Vacuum-Assisted Beast Biopsy for Management of Benign Breast Masses.

Q3 Medicine
The gulf journal of oncology Pub Date : 2023-09-01
Khalil Terro, Khalid ALhajri, Mariam ALshammari
{"title":"Outcomes of Vacuum-Assisted Beast Biopsy for Management of Benign Breast Masses.","authors":"Khalil Terro,&nbsp;Khalid ALhajri,&nbsp;Mariam ALshammari","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The triple assessment, which combines a clinical examination, radiological imaging, and pathology, is used to assess the breast mass. The open excision of the suspicious lesion is the gold standard for breast biopsy techniques. However, because an excisional biopsy always results in a scar, many surgeons are considering less invasive, alternative methods due to the cost and morbidity of this operation. Image-guided percutaneous core-needle biopsy has recently gained popularity in identifying palpable and non-palpable breast lesions. Vacuum- assisted breast biopsy (VABB) was created to address some of these limitations of core-needle biopsy.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>We performed a retrospective review of 38 patients who underwent VABB.To Report the recurrence one-year post-VABB for management of benign breast masses and To evaluate patient-reported cosmetic satisfaction using the cosmetic scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of the study participants was about 30.34 (±10.11) years. The average size of breast masses was 1.23 (±0.83) cm. The recurrence rate was 13.16%, confirmed by follow up ultrasound and all these patients underwent excisional biopsy. There were significant differences in breast mass recurrence rate by the side affected. Recurrence was more likely in right-sided breast masses (P=0.048).In our study, no significant relationships between the occurrence of complications following surgery and patients 'demographics and mass features and no infection were reported. The hematoma was reported in 2 patients 5.26 %, Mild induration at the site of surgery 2 patients 5.26 %, Small contusion at the site of surgery in one patient 2.63 % and no other complication was reported. The patient's cosmetic satisfaction using the cosmetic scale from 1-5,1: not satisfied,2:low satisfaction,3:mild satisfaction,4:moderate satisfaction,5; completely satisfied, The mean cosmetic score was 4.03.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study concluded that VABB is reliable for removing small benign breast masses with a satisfying cosmetic outcome &low recurrence rate, and fewer complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":53633,"journal":{"name":"The gulf journal of oncology","volume":"1 43","pages":"25-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The gulf journal of oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The triple assessment, which combines a clinical examination, radiological imaging, and pathology, is used to assess the breast mass. The open excision of the suspicious lesion is the gold standard for breast biopsy techniques. However, because an excisional biopsy always results in a scar, many surgeons are considering less invasive, alternative methods due to the cost and morbidity of this operation. Image-guided percutaneous core-needle biopsy has recently gained popularity in identifying palpable and non-palpable breast lesions. Vacuum- assisted breast biopsy (VABB) was created to address some of these limitations of core-needle biopsy.

Methodology: We performed a retrospective review of 38 patients who underwent VABB.To Report the recurrence one-year post-VABB for management of benign breast masses and To evaluate patient-reported cosmetic satisfaction using the cosmetic scale.

Results: The mean age of the study participants was about 30.34 (±10.11) years. The average size of breast masses was 1.23 (±0.83) cm. The recurrence rate was 13.16%, confirmed by follow up ultrasound and all these patients underwent excisional biopsy. There were significant differences in breast mass recurrence rate by the side affected. Recurrence was more likely in right-sided breast masses (P=0.048).In our study, no significant relationships between the occurrence of complications following surgery and patients 'demographics and mass features and no infection were reported. The hematoma was reported in 2 patients 5.26 %, Mild induration at the site of surgery 2 patients 5.26 %, Small contusion at the site of surgery in one patient 2.63 % and no other complication was reported. The patient's cosmetic satisfaction using the cosmetic scale from 1-5,1: not satisfied,2:low satisfaction,3:mild satisfaction,4:moderate satisfaction,5; completely satisfied, The mean cosmetic score was 4.03.

Conclusion: Our study concluded that VABB is reliable for removing small benign breast masses with a satisfying cosmetic outcome &low recurrence rate, and fewer complications.

良性乳腺肿块的真空辅助Beast活检结果。
引言:三重评估结合了临床检查、放射学成像和病理学,用于评估乳腺肿块。可疑病变的开放切除是乳腺活检技术的黄金标准。然而,由于切除活组织检查总是会导致疤痕,由于这种手术的成本和发病率,许多外科医生正在考虑微创的替代方法。图像引导的经皮核心针活检术最近在识别可触摸和不可触摸的乳腺病变方面越来越受欢迎。真空辅助乳腺活检(VABB)是为了解决核心针活检的一些局限性而创建的。方法:我们对38例接受VABB的患者进行了回顾性审查。报告VABB后一年良性乳腺肿块的复发情况,并使用美容量表评估患者报告的美容满意度。结果:研究参与者的平均年龄约为30.34(±10.11)岁。乳腺肿块的平均大小为1.23(±0.83)cm。随访超声证实,复发率为13.16%,所有患者均接受了切除活检。受影响侧乳腺肿块复发率存在显著差异。右侧乳腺肿块复发的可能性更大(P=0.048)。在我们的研究中,手术后并发症的发生与患者的人口统计学和肿块特征之间没有显著关系,也没有感染报告。血肿2例5.26%,手术部位轻度硬结2例5.26%,手术部位小挫伤1例2.63%,无其他并发症报告。患者使用美容量表的美容满意度为1-5,1:不满意,2:低满意度,3:轻度满意度,4:中度满意度,5;完全满意,平均美容评分为4.03。结论:我们的研究得出结论,VABB是去除小型良性乳腺肿块的可靠方法,美容效果令人满意,复发率低,并发症少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
The gulf journal of oncology
The gulf journal of oncology Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信