A retrospective review of the rate of septic knee arthritis after retrograde femoral nailing for traumatic femoral fractures at a single academic institution.

Ryan S Bailey, Benjamin A Nwadike, Thomas Revak
{"title":"A retrospective review of the rate of septic knee arthritis after retrograde femoral nailing for traumatic femoral fractures at a single academic institution.","authors":"Ryan S Bailey,&nbsp;Benjamin A Nwadike,&nbsp;Thomas Revak","doi":"10.1097/OI9.0000000000000264","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Retrograde intramedullary nailing of the femur is a popular treatment option for femoral shaft fractures. However, this requires accessing the intramedullary canal through the knee, posing a risk of intra-articular infection. The purpose of this study was to examine the rate of intra-articular infection of the knee after retrograde nailing of femoral shaft fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patients who underwent retrograde intramedullary nailing for femoral shaft fractures between June 2004 and December 2017 at a level 1 trauma center were reviewed. Six months of follow-up or documented fracture union was required. Records were reviewed for documentation of septic arthritis of the ipsilateral knee during the follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 294 fractures, including 217 closed and 77 open injuries, were included. Eighteen had an associated ipsilateral traumatic arthrotomy; 188 cases had an associated ipsilateral lower extremity fracture. No cases of septic arthritis were identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There were no cases of septic arthritis in 294 fractures treated with retrograde intramedullary nailing. Retrograde nailing appears safe for risk of postoperative septic arthritis of the knee even in the face of open fractures and traumatic wounds.</p>","PeriodicalId":74381,"journal":{"name":"OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma","volume":"6 2","pages":"e264"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a8/d9/oi9-6-e264.PMC10538562.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/OI9.0000000000000264","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Retrograde intramedullary nailing of the femur is a popular treatment option for femoral shaft fractures. However, this requires accessing the intramedullary canal through the knee, posing a risk of intra-articular infection. The purpose of this study was to examine the rate of intra-articular infection of the knee after retrograde nailing of femoral shaft fractures.

Methods: All patients who underwent retrograde intramedullary nailing for femoral shaft fractures between June 2004 and December 2017 at a level 1 trauma center were reviewed. Six months of follow-up or documented fracture union was required. Records were reviewed for documentation of septic arthritis of the ipsilateral knee during the follow-up period.

Results: A total of 294 fractures, including 217 closed and 77 open injuries, were included. Eighteen had an associated ipsilateral traumatic arthrotomy; 188 cases had an associated ipsilateral lower extremity fracture. No cases of septic arthritis were identified.

Conclusion: There were no cases of septic arthritis in 294 fractures treated with retrograde intramedullary nailing. Retrograde nailing appears safe for risk of postoperative septic arthritis of the knee even in the face of open fractures and traumatic wounds.

Abstract Image

一项在单一学术机构对逆行股骨内钉治疗创伤性股骨骨折后感染性膝关节炎发生率的回顾性综述。
背景:股骨逆行髓内钉是治疗股骨干骨折的常用方法。然而,这需要通过膝盖进入髓内管,存在关节内感染的风险。本研究的目的是检查股骨干骨折逆行钉扎后膝关节内感染的发生率。方法:回顾2004年6月至2017年12月在一级创伤中心接受逆行髓内钉治疗股骨干骨折的所有患者。需要六个月的随访或记录骨折愈合情况。在随访期间,对同侧膝关节感染性关节炎的记录进行了审查。结果:共有294处骨折,包括217处闭合性和77处开放性损伤。18人接受了相关的同侧创伤性关节切开术;188例伴有同侧下肢骨折。未发现感染性关节炎病例。结论:应用逆行髓内钉治疗294例骨折,无感染性关节炎病例。即使在开放性骨折和创伤的情况下,逆行钉扎对术后膝关节感染性关节炎的风险也是安全的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信