Standardized Protocol for Chest Tube Management for Trauma Patients Significantly Decreases Complications.

Surgery Research and Practice Pub Date : 2023-09-21 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2023/2615557
Christopher A Dai, Christopher J Fang, David Schwartz, Jessica Enderson, Ashley McMann, Russel Hyde, Nathan Smith, Jennifer Serfin
{"title":"Standardized Protocol for Chest Tube Management for Trauma Patients Significantly Decreases Complications.","authors":"Christopher A Dai,&nbsp;Christopher J Fang,&nbsp;David Schwartz,&nbsp;Jessica Enderson,&nbsp;Ashley McMann,&nbsp;Russel Hyde,&nbsp;Nathan Smith,&nbsp;Jennifer Serfin","doi":"10.1155/2023/2615557","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As health care shifts to a value-based model with a focus on patient outcomes per dollar spent, it is important to develop and evaluate standardized protocols that ultimately lead to improved patient outcomes and decreased hospital complications. Prior to our chest tube protocol, chest tube management at our Trauma Center was nonuniform and surgeon-specific. The aim of this study was to (1) develop an institutional standardized protocol for chest tube management at our Level II Trauma Center and (2) compare patient outcomes before and after the implementation of our protocol.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An institutional, standardized protocol was initiated at our Level II-Certified Trauma Center teaching hospital in 2014. An IRB-approved, single-institution retrospective chart review was performed between January 2011 and May 2017, in order to capture the 3 years prior and 3 years after protocol implementation. All patients with a diagnosis of hemothorax or pneumothorax (H/PTX) from blunt or penetrating trauma that resulted in a >24 French chest tube placement were included in the study. Patients were excluded if interventional radiology (IR) placed the chest tube, the mechanism was nontraumatic, or the patient expired at index hospitalization. Univariate analyses were performed to evaluate significant differences in patient outcomes before and after the implementation of the protocol.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 143 patients were analyzed for this study, with 43 preprotocol patients and 100 postprotocol patients. Hospital length of stay (LOS), persistent H/PTX, and the need for further surgical intervention all improved after the implementation of the standardized protocol (<i>p</i> < 0.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our standardized protocol for chest tube management at our Level II Trauma Center significantly improved patient outcomes and can serve as a model for similar institutions.</p>","PeriodicalId":30584,"journal":{"name":"Surgery Research and Practice","volume":"2023 ","pages":"2615557"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10539096/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/2615557","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: As health care shifts to a value-based model with a focus on patient outcomes per dollar spent, it is important to develop and evaluate standardized protocols that ultimately lead to improved patient outcomes and decreased hospital complications. Prior to our chest tube protocol, chest tube management at our Trauma Center was nonuniform and surgeon-specific. The aim of this study was to (1) develop an institutional standardized protocol for chest tube management at our Level II Trauma Center and (2) compare patient outcomes before and after the implementation of our protocol.

Methods: An institutional, standardized protocol was initiated at our Level II-Certified Trauma Center teaching hospital in 2014. An IRB-approved, single-institution retrospective chart review was performed between January 2011 and May 2017, in order to capture the 3 years prior and 3 years after protocol implementation. All patients with a diagnosis of hemothorax or pneumothorax (H/PTX) from blunt or penetrating trauma that resulted in a >24 French chest tube placement were included in the study. Patients were excluded if interventional radiology (IR) placed the chest tube, the mechanism was nontraumatic, or the patient expired at index hospitalization. Univariate analyses were performed to evaluate significant differences in patient outcomes before and after the implementation of the protocol.

Results: A total of 143 patients were analyzed for this study, with 43 preprotocol patients and 100 postprotocol patients. Hospital length of stay (LOS), persistent H/PTX, and the need for further surgical intervention all improved after the implementation of the standardized protocol (p < 0.04).

Conclusions: Our standardized protocol for chest tube management at our Level II Trauma Center significantly improved patient outcomes and can serve as a model for similar institutions.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

创伤患者胸管管理标准化方案显著降低并发症。
背景:随着医疗保健转向基于价值的模式,重点关注每花费一美元的患者结果,制定和评估最终改善患者结果和减少医院并发症的标准化方案非常重要。在我们的胸管方案之前,我们创伤中心的胸管管理是不统一的,并且是外科医生特有的。本研究的目的是(1)在我们的二级创伤中心制定一个胸管管理的机构标准化方案,以及(2)比较实施方案前后的患者结果。方法:2014年,我们的二级创伤中心教学医院启动了一项制度化、标准化的方案。2011年1月至2017年5月期间,IRB批准了一项单一机构回顾性图表审查,以记录方案实施前3年和实施后3年的情况。所有诊断为钝性或穿透性创伤导致24个以上法国胸管置入的血胸或胸腔积液(H/PTX)的患者均纳入研究。如果介入放射学(IR)放置了胸管,其机制是非创伤性的,或者患者在指数住院时过期,则将患者排除在外。进行单变量分析,以评估方案实施前后患者结果的显著差异。结果:本研究共分析了143例患者,其中43例为协议前患者,100例为协议后患者。标准化方案实施后,住院时间(LOS)、持续性H/PTX和进一步手术干预的需要都有所改善(p 结论:我们在二级创伤中心的胸管管理标准化方案显著改善了患者的预后,可以作为类似机构的典范。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊介绍: Surgery Research and Practice is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that provides a forum for surgeons and the surgical research community. The journal publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies focusing on clinical and laboratory research relevant to surgical practice and teaching, with an emphasis on findings directly affecting surgical management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信