Detection of Bacterial Colonization in Lung Transplant Recipients Using an Electronic Nose.

IF 1.9 Q3 TRANSPLANTATION
Transplantation Direct Pub Date : 2023-09-20 eCollection Date: 2023-10-01 DOI:10.1097/TXD.0000000000001533
Nynke Wijbenga, Nadine L A de Jong, Rogier A S Hoek, Bas J Mathot, Leonard Seghers, Joachim G J V Aerts, Daniel Bos, Olivier C Manintveld, Merel E Hellemons
{"title":"Detection of Bacterial Colonization in Lung Transplant Recipients Using an Electronic Nose.","authors":"Nynke Wijbenga,&nbsp;Nadine L A de Jong,&nbsp;Rogier A S Hoek,&nbsp;Bas J Mathot,&nbsp;Leonard Seghers,&nbsp;Joachim G J V Aerts,&nbsp;Daniel Bos,&nbsp;Olivier C Manintveld,&nbsp;Merel E Hellemons","doi":"10.1097/TXD.0000000000001533","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bacterial colonization (BC) of the lower airways is common in lung transplant recipients (LTRs) and increases the risk of chronic lung allograft dysfunction. Diagnosis often requires bronchoscopy. Exhaled breath analysis using electronic nose (eNose) technology may noninvasively detect BC in LTRs. Therefore, we aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of an eNose to detect BC in LTRs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a cross-sectional analysis within a prospective, single-center cohort study assessing the diagnostic accuracy of detecting BC using eNose technology in LTRs. In the outpatient clinic, consecutive LTR eNose measurements were collected. We assessed and classified the eNose measurements for the presence of BC. Using supervised machine learning, the diagnostic accuracy of eNose for BC was assessed in a random training and validation set. Model performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 161 LTRs were included with 80 exclusions because of various reasons. Of the remaining 81 patients, 16 (20%) were classified as BC and 65 (80%) as non-BC. eNose-based classification of patients with and without BC provided an area under the curve of 0.82 in the training set and 0.97 in the validation set.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Exhaled breath analysis using eNose technology has the potential to noninvasively detect BC.</p>","PeriodicalId":23225,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation Direct","volume":"9 10","pages":"e1533"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a0/37/txd-9-e1533.PMC10513211.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation Direct","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/TXD.0000000000001533","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TRANSPLANTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Bacterial colonization (BC) of the lower airways is common in lung transplant recipients (LTRs) and increases the risk of chronic lung allograft dysfunction. Diagnosis often requires bronchoscopy. Exhaled breath analysis using electronic nose (eNose) technology may noninvasively detect BC in LTRs. Therefore, we aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of an eNose to detect BC in LTRs.

Methods: We performed a cross-sectional analysis within a prospective, single-center cohort study assessing the diagnostic accuracy of detecting BC using eNose technology in LTRs. In the outpatient clinic, consecutive LTR eNose measurements were collected. We assessed and classified the eNose measurements for the presence of BC. Using supervised machine learning, the diagnostic accuracy of eNose for BC was assessed in a random training and validation set. Model performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic analysis.

Results: In total, 161 LTRs were included with 80 exclusions because of various reasons. Of the remaining 81 patients, 16 (20%) were classified as BC and 65 (80%) as non-BC. eNose-based classification of patients with and without BC provided an area under the curve of 0.82 in the training set and 0.97 in the validation set.

Conclusions: Exhaled breath analysis using eNose technology has the potential to noninvasively detect BC.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

用电子鼻检测肺移植受者的细菌定植。
背景:下呼吸道细菌定植(BC)在肺移植受者中很常见,并增加了慢性肺移植功能障碍的风险。诊断通常需要支气管镜检查。使用电子鼻(eNose)技术的呼气分析可以无创地检测LTR中的BC。因此,我们旨在评估eNose在LTR中检测BC的诊断准确性。方法:我们在一项前瞻性单中心队列研究中进行了横断面分析,评估使用eNose技术在LTR检测BC的准确性。在门诊部,收集连续的LTR eNose测量值。我们评估并分类了eNose测量的BC的存在。使用监督机器学习,在随机训练和验证集中评估eNose对BC的诊断准确性。使用接收器操作特性分析来评估模型性能。结果:由于各种原因,共有161份LTR被纳入,其中80份被排除在外。在剩下的81名患者中,16名(20%)被归类为BC,65名(80%)为非BC。对患有和不患有BC的患者进行基于eNose的分类,在训练集中提供了0.82的曲线下面积,在验证集中提供了0.97的曲线下区域。结论:使用eNose技术进行呼气分析具有无创检测BC的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transplantation Direct
Transplantation Direct TRANSPLANTATION-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.30%
发文量
193
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信