An Integrative Review of Response Rates in Nursing Research Utilizing Online Surveys.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Nursing Research Pub Date : 2023-11-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-19 DOI:10.1097/NNR.0000000000000690
Kristine M L'Ecuyer, Divya S Subramaniam, Clarissa Swope, Helen W Lach
{"title":"An Integrative Review of Response Rates in Nursing Research Utilizing Online Surveys.","authors":"Kristine M L'Ecuyer,&nbsp;Divya S Subramaniam,&nbsp;Clarissa Swope,&nbsp;Helen W Lach","doi":"10.1097/NNR.0000000000000690","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Online surveys in nursing research have both advantages and disadvantages. Reaching a sample and attaining an appropriate response rate is an ongoing challenge and necessitates careful consideration when designing a nursing research study using an online survey approach.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>In this study, we aimed to explore response rates and survey characteristics of studies by nurse researchers that used online methodologies to survey nurses, nursing students, and nursing faculty.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an integrative review of research studies that used online surveys for data collection published from 2011 to 2021. We examined response rates and survey characteristics such as recruitment method, use of incentives, question type, length of survey, time to complete the survey, and use of reminders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our review included 51 studies published by nurses with target samples of nurses, nursing students, or nursing faculty. Study sample sizes ranged from 48 to 29,283, the number of respondents ranged from 29 to 3,607, and the response rates ranged from 3.4% to 98%, with an average of 42.46%. Few patterns emerged regarding recruitment or other factors to enhance response rates; only five studies used incentives.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Response rates to online surveys are unlikely to reach the rates seen in older mailed surveys. Researchers need to design online survey studies to be easily accessible, concise, and appealing to participants.</p>","PeriodicalId":49723,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Research","volume":" ","pages":"471-480"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NNR.0000000000000690","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Online surveys in nursing research have both advantages and disadvantages. Reaching a sample and attaining an appropriate response rate is an ongoing challenge and necessitates careful consideration when designing a nursing research study using an online survey approach.

Objective: In this study, we aimed to explore response rates and survey characteristics of studies by nurse researchers that used online methodologies to survey nurses, nursing students, and nursing faculty.

Methods: We conducted an integrative review of research studies that used online surveys for data collection published from 2011 to 2021. We examined response rates and survey characteristics such as recruitment method, use of incentives, question type, length of survey, time to complete the survey, and use of reminders.

Results: Our review included 51 studies published by nurses with target samples of nurses, nursing students, or nursing faculty. Study sample sizes ranged from 48 to 29,283, the number of respondents ranged from 29 to 3,607, and the response rates ranged from 3.4% to 98%, with an average of 42.46%. Few patterns emerged regarding recruitment or other factors to enhance response rates; only five studies used incentives.

Conclusion: Response rates to online surveys are unlikely to reach the rates seen in older mailed surveys. Researchers need to design online survey studies to be easily accessible, concise, and appealing to participants.

利用在线调查对护理研究应答率的综合评价。
背景:在线调查在护理研究中既有优点也有缺点。达到样本并获得适当的应答率是一项持续的挑战,在使用在线调查方法设计护理研究时需要仔细考虑。目的:在本研究中,我们旨在探索护士研究人员使用在线方法对护士、护理学生和护理教师进行调查的研究的响应率和调查特征。方法:我们对2011-2021年发表的使用在线调查进行数据收集的研究进行了综合回顾。我们检查了回复率和调查特征,如招聘方法、激励措施的使用、问题类型、调查时间、完成调查的时间和提醒的使用。结果:我们的综述包括51项由护士发表的研究,目标样本为护士、护理专业学生或护理系教师。研究样本量在48-29283人之间,受访者人数在29-3607人之间,应答率在3.4%-98%之间,平均为42.46%。很少出现关于招募或其他因素来提高应答率的模式;只有五项研究使用了激励措施。结论:在线调查的回复率不太可能达到旧的邮寄调查中的回复率。研究人员需要设计在线调查研究,使其易于访问、简洁并吸引参与者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nursing Research
Nursing Research 医学-护理
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.00%
发文量
102
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing Research is a peer-reviewed journal celebrating over 60 years as the most sought-after nursing resource; it offers more depth, more detail, and more of what today''s nurses demand. Nursing Research covers key issues, including health promotion, human responses to illness, acute care nursing research, symptom management, cost-effectiveness, vulnerable populations, health services, and community-based nursing studies. Each issue highlights the latest research techniques, quantitative and qualitative studies, and new state-of-the-art methodological strategies, including information not yet found in textbooks. Expert commentaries and briefs are also included. In addition to 6 issues per year, Nursing Research from time to time publishes supplemental content not found anywhere else.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信