Risk Factors for Missed Appointments at a Multisite Academic Urban Urogynecology Practice.

IF 0.8 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.) Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-31 DOI:10.1097/SPV.0000000000001406
Jeannine M Miranne, Alexa Courtepatte, Stephanie Schatzman-Bone, Vatche A Minassian
{"title":"Risk Factors for Missed Appointments at a Multisite Academic Urban Urogynecology Practice.","authors":"Jeannine M Miranne, Alexa Courtepatte, Stephanie Schatzman-Bone, Vatche A Minassian","doi":"10.1097/SPV.0000000000001406","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Missed appointments lead to decreased clinical productivity and poor health outcomes.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objectives of this study were to describe sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of patients who miss urogynecology appointments and identify risk factors for missed appointments.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>We conducted an institutional review board-approved case-control study of women 18 years or older scheduled for a urogynecology appointment at 1 of 4 sites associated with an urban academic tertiary care center over 4 months. Patients were included in the missed appointment group if they canceled their appointments the same day or did not show up for them. For comparison, we included a control group consisting of patients immediately preceding or following the ones who missed their appointments with the same visit type. Logistic regression was used to identify risk factors for missed appointments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four hundred twenty-six women were included: 213 in the missed appointment group and 213 in the control group. Women who missed appointments were younger (60 years [interquartile range (IQR), 47-72 years] vs 69 years [IQR, 59-78 years], P < 0.0001). More women in the missed appointment group were Hispanic (24.4% vs 13.1%) and non-Hispanic Black (7.5% vs 3.8%, P = 0.009), had Medicaid (17.4% vs 6.57%, P = 0.0006), missed previous appointments (24.9% vs 11.7% P = 0.0005), waited longer for appointments (39 days [IQR, 23.5-55.5 days] vs 30.5 days [IQR, 12.8-47.0 days], P = 0.002), and made appointments for urinary incontinence (44.1% vs 26.8%, P = 0.0002). On multivariate logistic regression, women with Medicaid had significantly higher odds of missing appointments (adjusted OR, 2.11 [1.04-4.48], P = 0.044).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Women with Medicaid were more likely to miss urogynecology appointments. Further research is needed to address barriers this group faces when accessing care.</p>","PeriodicalId":75288,"journal":{"name":"Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000001406","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Missed appointments lead to decreased clinical productivity and poor health outcomes.

Objectives: The objectives of this study were to describe sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of patients who miss urogynecology appointments and identify risk factors for missed appointments.

Study design: We conducted an institutional review board-approved case-control study of women 18 years or older scheduled for a urogynecology appointment at 1 of 4 sites associated with an urban academic tertiary care center over 4 months. Patients were included in the missed appointment group if they canceled their appointments the same day or did not show up for them. For comparison, we included a control group consisting of patients immediately preceding or following the ones who missed their appointments with the same visit type. Logistic regression was used to identify risk factors for missed appointments.

Results: Four hundred twenty-six women were included: 213 in the missed appointment group and 213 in the control group. Women who missed appointments were younger (60 years [interquartile range (IQR), 47-72 years] vs 69 years [IQR, 59-78 years], P < 0.0001). More women in the missed appointment group were Hispanic (24.4% vs 13.1%) and non-Hispanic Black (7.5% vs 3.8%, P = 0.009), had Medicaid (17.4% vs 6.57%, P = 0.0006), missed previous appointments (24.9% vs 11.7% P = 0.0005), waited longer for appointments (39 days [IQR, 23.5-55.5 days] vs 30.5 days [IQR, 12.8-47.0 days], P = 0.002), and made appointments for urinary incontinence (44.1% vs 26.8%, P = 0.0002). On multivariate logistic regression, women with Medicaid had significantly higher odds of missing appointments (adjusted OR, 2.11 [1.04-4.48], P = 0.044).

Conclusions: Women with Medicaid were more likely to miss urogynecology appointments. Further research is needed to address barriers this group faces when accessing care.

多站点城市泌尿妇科学术实践中错过预约的风险因素。
重要性:错过预约会导致临床生产力下降和健康状况不佳。目的:本研究的目的是描述错过泌尿生殖系统预约的患者的社会人口学和临床特征,并确定错过预约的风险因素。研究设计:我们对18岁或18岁以上的女性进行了一项机构审查委员会批准的病例对照研究,该研究计划在4个月内在与城市学术三级护理中心相关的4个地点中的1个地点进行泌尿生殖科预约。如果患者在同一天取消了预约或没有出现,则将其纳入错过预约组。为了进行比较,我们纳入了一个对照组,该对照组由在错过同一就诊类型预约的患者之前或之后的患者组成。Logistic回归用于确定错过预约的风险因素。结果:426名女性被纳入:213名在错过预约组,213名在对照组。错过预约的女性更年轻(60岁[四分位间距(IQR),47-72岁]vs 69岁[IQR,59-78岁],P<0.0001)。错过预约组中更多的女性是西班牙裔(24.4%vs 13.1%)和非西班牙黑人(7.5%vs 3.8%,P=0.009),有医疗补助(17.4%vs 6.57%,P=0.0006),错过了以前的预约(24.9%vs 11.7%,P=0.0005),等待预约的时间更长(39天[ICR,23.5-55.5天]vs 30.5天[IQR,12.8-47.0天],P=0.002),并预约尿失禁(44.1%vs 26.8%,P=0.0002),接受医疗补助的女性错过预约的几率明显更高(调整OR,2.11[1.04-4.48],P=0.044)。需要进一步的研究来解决这一群体在获得护理时面临的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信