The Prevalence and Payer Costs of Potentially Avoidable Emergent Care Visits for Suspected Amniotic Membrane Rupture in Pregnant Women.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
American Health and Drug Benefits Pub Date : 2018-07-01
Christine Ferro, Bruce S Pyenson, Jocelyn Lau, Mona Kelkar, Nancy Phillips, Chi-Wei Lu, Percy Yeung, Gloria Bachmann
{"title":"The Prevalence and Payer Costs of Potentially Avoidable Emergent Care Visits for Suspected Amniotic Membrane Rupture in Pregnant Women.","authors":"Christine Ferro,&nbsp;Bruce S Pyenson,&nbsp;Jocelyn Lau,&nbsp;Mona Kelkar,&nbsp;Nancy Phillips,&nbsp;Chi-Wei Lu,&nbsp;Percy Yeung,&nbsp;Gloria Bachmann","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Concern over amniotic fluid leakage is common among pregnant women. Uncertainty about prelabor rupture of amniotic membranes (PROM) can lead women to present to emergency departments or to labor and delivery units for medical evaluation. Many of such visits do not result in delivery, yet they carry significant, and potentially unnecessary, healthcare expenditures.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To estimate the prevalence and payer cost of potentially avoidable visits by pregnant women to an emergent care facility (including emergency departments, labor and delivery units, or observation units) for suspected PROM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 2 processes-an electronic medical records chart review and a commercial health insurance claims data analysis. The medical chart review included 843 scheduled and 1250 unscheduled pregnancy-related visits at Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital between January 4 and June 30, 2017, which was conducted to determine the rates of visits by pregnant women with suspected PROM and their results (ie, hospital admission or discharge). In addition, we performed a retrospective analysis of medical claims data from the Truven Health MarketScan Commercial Database to measure population-level incidence rates and the costs of pregnancy-related emergent care visits for suspected PROM.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 1250 unscheduled visits reviewed, 663 did not result in delivery; of these, 68 had a primary complaint of suspected PROM, and 55 (81%) of them were discharged with PROM ruled out. Of all scheduled and unscheduled nondelivery visits (N = 1069), 5.1% (N = 55) were associated with suspected PROM but were discharged home with PROM ruled out. In the commercial claims analysis, the average rate of emergent care visits by pregnant women was 436.69 per 1000 deliveries, with an estimated average cost of $1428 per visit (in 2018 dollars), or $0.58 per member per month. Applying the rates from our chart review to the claims data, we estimated that commercial insurers pay, on average, for approximately 22.47 facility visits per 1000 deliveries for suspected and ruled-out PROM.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest that for most PROM cases that do not result in delivery, PROM is ruled out and patients are sent home. Reducing the number of PROM-related visits to emergent care facilities that result in ruled-out PROM could reduce healthcare costs and help patients and providers avoid these inconvenient visits.</p>","PeriodicalId":48595,"journal":{"name":"American Health and Drug Benefits","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6207302/pdf/ahdb-11-241.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Health and Drug Benefits","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Concern over amniotic fluid leakage is common among pregnant women. Uncertainty about prelabor rupture of amniotic membranes (PROM) can lead women to present to emergency departments or to labor and delivery units for medical evaluation. Many of such visits do not result in delivery, yet they carry significant, and potentially unnecessary, healthcare expenditures.

Objective: To estimate the prevalence and payer cost of potentially avoidable visits by pregnant women to an emergent care facility (including emergency departments, labor and delivery units, or observation units) for suspected PROM.

Methods: This study included 2 processes-an electronic medical records chart review and a commercial health insurance claims data analysis. The medical chart review included 843 scheduled and 1250 unscheduled pregnancy-related visits at Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital between January 4 and June 30, 2017, which was conducted to determine the rates of visits by pregnant women with suspected PROM and their results (ie, hospital admission or discharge). In addition, we performed a retrospective analysis of medical claims data from the Truven Health MarketScan Commercial Database to measure population-level incidence rates and the costs of pregnancy-related emergent care visits for suspected PROM.

Results: Of the 1250 unscheduled visits reviewed, 663 did not result in delivery; of these, 68 had a primary complaint of suspected PROM, and 55 (81%) of them were discharged with PROM ruled out. Of all scheduled and unscheduled nondelivery visits (N = 1069), 5.1% (N = 55) were associated with suspected PROM but were discharged home with PROM ruled out. In the commercial claims analysis, the average rate of emergent care visits by pregnant women was 436.69 per 1000 deliveries, with an estimated average cost of $1428 per visit (in 2018 dollars), or $0.58 per member per month. Applying the rates from our chart review to the claims data, we estimated that commercial insurers pay, on average, for approximately 22.47 facility visits per 1000 deliveries for suspected and ruled-out PROM.

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that for most PROM cases that do not result in delivery, PROM is ruled out and patients are sent home. Reducing the number of PROM-related visits to emergent care facilities that result in ruled-out PROM could reduce healthcare costs and help patients and providers avoid these inconvenient visits.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

孕妇疑似羊膜破裂潜在可避免急诊就诊的患病率和支付费用。
背景:对羊水渗漏的担忧在孕妇中很常见。产前羊膜破裂(PROM)的不确定性可能导致妇女去急诊科或分娩和分娩单位进行医疗评估。许多这样的就诊并没有带来分娩,但它们带来了巨大的、潜在的不必要的医疗支出。目的:估计孕妇因疑似胎膜早破而前往紧急护理机构(包括急诊科、分娩和分娩单位或观察单位)进行可能避免的就诊的发生率和支付费用。方法:本研究包括两个过程——电子病历表审查和商业健康保险索赔数据分析。病历审查包括2017年1月4日至6月30日期间在罗伯特·伍德·约翰逊大学医院进行的843次计划外和1250次计划外妊娠相关就诊,旨在确定疑似胎膜早破孕妇的就诊率及其结果(即入院或出院)。此外,我们对Truven Health MarketScan商业数据库中的医疗索赔数据进行了回顾性分析,以衡量人群水平的发病率和疑似胎膜早破的妊娠相关紧急护理就诊的费用;其中,68人以疑似胎膜早破为主要主诉,其中55人(81%)因排除胎膜早闭而出院。在所有预定和非预定的未分娩访视(N=1069)中,5.1%(N=55)与疑似胎膜早破有关,但因排除胎膜早出而出院回家。在商业索赔分析中,孕妇的平均紧急护理就诊率为每1000次分娩436.69次,估计每次就诊的平均费用为1428美元(2018年美元),即每位会员每月0.58美元。将我们的图表审查中的费率应用于索赔数据,我们估计商业保险公司平均每1000次分娩中为疑似和排除的胎膜早破患者支付约22.47次就诊费用。减少因胎膜早破而被排除在外的急诊机构就诊次数,可以降低医疗成本,帮助患者和提供者避免这些不方便的就诊。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Health and Drug Benefits
American Health and Drug Benefits Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
期刊介绍: AHDB welcomes articles on clinical-, policy-, and business-related topics relevant to the integration of the forces in healthcare that affect the cost and quality of healthcare delivery, improve healthcare quality, and ultimately result in access to care, focusing on health organization structures and processes, health information, health policies, health and behavioral economics, as well as health technologies, products, and patient behaviors relevant to value-based quality of care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信