Tools and resources used to support implementation of workplace healthy food and drink policies: A scoping review of grey literature.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Nutrition & Dietetics Pub Date : 2023-11-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-24 DOI:10.1111/1747-0080.12844
Magda Rosin, Sally Mackay, Cliona Ni Mhurchu
{"title":"Tools and resources used to support implementation of workplace healthy food and drink policies: A scoping review of grey literature.","authors":"Magda Rosin, Sally Mackay, Cliona Ni Mhurchu","doi":"10.1111/1747-0080.12844","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aimed to identify and evaluate tools and resources used to support the implementation of workplace healthy food and drink policies, primarily in Australia and New Zealand.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping grey literature review included searches of government agencies and non-governmental organisations' websites in six English-speaking countries, public health nutrition intervention databases and Google search engine queries. Paper-based and digital tools were included if they were written in English, referred to within a policy or on a policy's website, and primarily targeting supply-side stakeholders. Tools were evaluated on two domains: 'Features' (summarised descriptively) and 'Usability and Quality' (with inter-rater reliability scores calculated using an intraclass correlation coefficient).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty paper-based tools were identified relating to Australian (n = 14) and New Zealand (n = 6) policies, and a further six digital tools were identified from Australia (n = 3) and Canada (n = 3). Target audiences included workplace managers, food providers and suppliers. The paper-based tools focused on general implementation guidance. In contrast, digital tools tended to support specific elements of policy implementation. 'Usability and Quality' scores ranged from 2.9 to 4.5 (out of 5.0) for paper-based tools, and 3.9 to 4.2 for digital tools, with a moderate agreement between reviewer scores (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.523, p = 0.010).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A range of tools have been developed to support the implementation of workplace healthy food and drink policies. Understanding the strengths and limitations of current tools will assist in developing improved aids to support policy implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":19368,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition & Dietetics","volume":" ","pages":"452-462"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition & Dietetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1747-0080.12844","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: This study aimed to identify and evaluate tools and resources used to support the implementation of workplace healthy food and drink policies, primarily in Australia and New Zealand.

Methods: A scoping grey literature review included searches of government agencies and non-governmental organisations' websites in six English-speaking countries, public health nutrition intervention databases and Google search engine queries. Paper-based and digital tools were included if they were written in English, referred to within a policy or on a policy's website, and primarily targeting supply-side stakeholders. Tools were evaluated on two domains: 'Features' (summarised descriptively) and 'Usability and Quality' (with inter-rater reliability scores calculated using an intraclass correlation coefficient).

Results: Twenty paper-based tools were identified relating to Australian (n = 14) and New Zealand (n = 6) policies, and a further six digital tools were identified from Australia (n = 3) and Canada (n = 3). Target audiences included workplace managers, food providers and suppliers. The paper-based tools focused on general implementation guidance. In contrast, digital tools tended to support specific elements of policy implementation. 'Usability and Quality' scores ranged from 2.9 to 4.5 (out of 5.0) for paper-based tools, and 3.9 to 4.2 for digital tools, with a moderate agreement between reviewer scores (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.523, p = 0.010).

Conclusions: A range of tools have been developed to support the implementation of workplace healthy food and drink policies. Understanding the strengths and limitations of current tools will assist in developing improved aids to support policy implementation.

用于支持工作场所健康食品和饮料政策实施的工具和资源:灰色文献的范围界定综述。
目的:本研究旨在确定和评估用于支持实施工作场所健康食品和饮料政策的工具和资源,主要在澳大利亚和新西兰。方法:一项范围界定的灰色文献综述包括对六个英语国家的政府机构和非政府组织网站的搜索、公共卫生营养干预数据库和谷歌搜索引擎查询。如果纸质工具和数字工具是用英语编写的,在政策中或政策网站上提及,并且主要针对供应方利益相关者,则将其包括在内。工具在两个领域进行了评估:“功能”(描述性总结)和“可用性和质量”(使用组内相关系数计算评分者间的可靠性得分)。结果:发现了20种与澳大利亚(n = 14) 和新西兰(n = 6) 政策,并从澳大利亚确定了另外六个数字工具(n = 3) 和加拿大(n = 3) 。目标受众包括工作场所管理人员、食品供应商和供应商。纸质工具侧重于一般实施指南。相比之下,数字工具往往支持政策实施的特定要素纸质工具的可用性和质量得分范围为2.9至4.5(满分5.0),数字工具的可用度和质量得分为3.9至4.2,评审员得分之间存在适度一致性(组内相关系数0.523,p = 0.010)。结论:已经开发了一系列工具来支持工作场所健康食品和饮料政策的实施。了解现有工具的优势和局限性将有助于开发改进的援助工具,以支持政策的实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nutrition & Dietetics
Nutrition & Dietetics 医学-营养学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
16.10%
发文量
69
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nutrition & Dietetics is the official journal of the Dietitians Association of Australia. Covering all aspects of food, nutrition and dietetics, the Journal provides a forum for the reporting, discussion and development of scientifically credible knowledge related to human nutrition and dietetics. Widely respected in Australia and around the world, Nutrition & Dietetics publishes original research, methodology analyses, research reviews and much more. The Journal aims to keep health professionals abreast of current knowledge on human nutrition and diet, and accepts contributions from around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信