Leading medical laboratory professionals toward change readiness: a correlational study.

Taryn L Waraksa-Deutsch
{"title":"Leading medical laboratory professionals toward change readiness: a correlational study.","authors":"Taryn L Waraksa-Deutsch","doi":"10.1093/labmed/lmad091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To remain effective in the dynamic health care landscape, the laboratory must embrace the continuous improvement mindset to support a culture of change, and leadership must facilitate the change process, mitigating perceived barriers of change readiness in followers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This quantitative study was designed to determine whether there is an association between leadership style (Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire [MLQ]) and change readiness (3-component model [TCM] commitment to change/Employee Commitment Survey, and whether leadership style predicts change readiness. Laboratory professionals (n = 718) were recruited through national societies to complete a combined MLQ-TCM survey instrument. Multivariate analysis of variance, Pearson correlations, and multiple regression analyses were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A significant correlation between leadership style and change readiness (transformational leadership [TL] and affective commitment to change, r(716) = .12, P = .002; passive-avoidant behavior and continuance commitment to change, r(716) = .25, P < .001) and between leadership style and leadership outcomes (TL and effectiveness, r(716) = .90, P < .001) was identified. Transformational leadership was a significant predictor of change readiness (β = .17, P < .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It is recommended that laboratory leaders use transformational leadership or situational leadership to improve followers' affective commitment to change and reduce followers' continuance commitment to change, thus improving commitment to continuous improvement. Leaders should also limit passive-avoidant behavior.</p>","PeriodicalId":94124,"journal":{"name":"Laboratory medicine","volume":" ","pages":"255-266"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11064098/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laboratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/labmed/lmad091","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To remain effective in the dynamic health care landscape, the laboratory must embrace the continuous improvement mindset to support a culture of change, and leadership must facilitate the change process, mitigating perceived barriers of change readiness in followers.

Methods: This quantitative study was designed to determine whether there is an association between leadership style (Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire [MLQ]) and change readiness (3-component model [TCM] commitment to change/Employee Commitment Survey, and whether leadership style predicts change readiness. Laboratory professionals (n = 718) were recruited through national societies to complete a combined MLQ-TCM survey instrument. Multivariate analysis of variance, Pearson correlations, and multiple regression analyses were performed.

Results: A significant correlation between leadership style and change readiness (transformational leadership [TL] and affective commitment to change, r(716) = .12, P = .002; passive-avoidant behavior and continuance commitment to change, r(716) = .25, P < .001) and between leadership style and leadership outcomes (TL and effectiveness, r(716) = .90, P < .001) was identified. Transformational leadership was a significant predictor of change readiness (β = .17, P < .05).

Conclusion: It is recommended that laboratory leaders use transformational leadership or situational leadership to improve followers' affective commitment to change and reduce followers' continuance commitment to change, thus improving commitment to continuous improvement. Leaders should also limit passive-avoidant behavior.

引领医学实验室专业人员做好变革准备:一项相关研究。
背景:为了在动态的医疗保健环境中保持有效,实验室必须接受持续改进的心态,以支持变革文化,领导层必须促进变革过程,减轻追随者对变革准备的障碍。方法:这项定量研究旨在确定领导风格(多因素领导问卷[MLQ])和变革准备度(三成分模型[TMC]变革承诺/员工承诺调查)之间是否存在关联,以及领导风格是否预测变革准备度完成了MLQ-TCM组合测量仪。进行多变量方差分析、Pearson相关分析和多元回归分析。结果:领导风格与变革准备度之间存在显著相关性(变革型领导[TL]和对变革的情感承诺,r(716)=0.12,P=0.002;被动回避型行为和对改变的持续承诺,r(716)=0.25,P<.001)以及领导风格和领导结果之间的关系(TL和有效性,r(714)=0.90,P<0.001)。变革型领导是变革准备度的重要预测因子(β=.17,P<.05)。领导者也应该限制被动的回避型行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信