Stigma and self-stigma in borderline personality disorder: A narrative review.

Neuro endocrinology letters Pub Date : 2023-07-05
Marie Ociskova, Jan Prasko, Jakub Vanek, Vlastimil Nesnidal, Tomas Sollar, Milos Slepecky
{"title":"Stigma and self-stigma in borderline personality disorder: A narrative review.","authors":"Marie Ociskova,&nbsp;Jan Prasko,&nbsp;Jakub Vanek,&nbsp;Vlastimil Nesnidal,&nbsp;Tomas Sollar,&nbsp;Milos Slepecky","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Borderline personality disorder (BPD) presents a highly stigmatised condition. Individuals with BPD may experience stigmatising attitudes and remarks from the general population and mental health professionals. Significant self-stigma also seems common. The paper reviews the current knowledge regarding the stigma connected to BPD.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The Web of Science, Medline, and Scopus databases identified studies published from January 1990 to January 2023. Additional references were found using analyses of the primary articles. The search terms included \"borderline\", \"stigma\", and \"self-stigma\".</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Public knowledge of BPD is scarce. The general population may interpret the BPD symptoms as \"purposeful misbehaviour\" rather than signs of a mental disorder. Mental health professionals commonly distance themselves from patients with BPD and may prematurely give up their treatment efforts. This stance often comes from believing BPD is difficult or impossible to treat. Therefore, treating patients with a personality disorder should be consulted with a supervisor, especially when the psychotherapist shows a negative attitude towards the patient. Generally, few BPD-specific destigmatisation interventions have been verified by research. Limited evidence suggests that targeted training of the healthcare providers can reduce stigmatising attitudes and that interventions combining positive messages of the recovery potential with biological aetiology of the disorder are most impactful in reducing the stigma.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>BPD is commonly stigmatised by the general population and mental health professionals. Destigmatising efforts need to tackle the stigma's primary sources, namely the general population's lack of understanding and the pessimistic beliefs in the healthcare providers. More BPD-specific research on stigma is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":94154,"journal":{"name":"Neuro endocrinology letters","volume":"44 4","pages":"206-215"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuro endocrinology letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Borderline personality disorder (BPD) presents a highly stigmatised condition. Individuals with BPD may experience stigmatising attitudes and remarks from the general population and mental health professionals. Significant self-stigma also seems common. The paper reviews the current knowledge regarding the stigma connected to BPD.

Method: The Web of Science, Medline, and Scopus databases identified studies published from January 1990 to January 2023. Additional references were found using analyses of the primary articles. The search terms included "borderline", "stigma", and "self-stigma".

Results: Public knowledge of BPD is scarce. The general population may interpret the BPD symptoms as "purposeful misbehaviour" rather than signs of a mental disorder. Mental health professionals commonly distance themselves from patients with BPD and may prematurely give up their treatment efforts. This stance often comes from believing BPD is difficult or impossible to treat. Therefore, treating patients with a personality disorder should be consulted with a supervisor, especially when the psychotherapist shows a negative attitude towards the patient. Generally, few BPD-specific destigmatisation interventions have been verified by research. Limited evidence suggests that targeted training of the healthcare providers can reduce stigmatising attitudes and that interventions combining positive messages of the recovery potential with biological aetiology of the disorder are most impactful in reducing the stigma.

Conclusion: BPD is commonly stigmatised by the general population and mental health professionals. Destigmatising efforts need to tackle the stigma's primary sources, namely the general population's lack of understanding and the pessimistic beliefs in the healthcare providers. More BPD-specific research on stigma is needed.

边缘型人格障碍中的污名和自我污名:叙事综述。
简介:边缘型人格障碍(BPD)是一种高度污名化的疾病。患有BPD的个人可能会经历来自普通人群和心理健康专业人员的污名化态度和言论。严重的自我羞辱似乎也很常见。本文综述了目前有关BPD污名的知识。方法:科学网、Medline和Scopus数据库确定了1990年1月至2023年1月发表的研究。通过对主要文章的分析发现了其他参考文献。搜索词包括“边界”、“污名”和“自我污名”。结果:公众对BPD的了解很少。一般人群可能会将BPD症状解释为“有目的的不当行为”,而不是精神障碍的迹象。心理健康专业人员通常与BPD患者保持距离,并可能过早放弃治疗努力。这种立场通常来自于认为BPD很难或不可能治疗。因此,治疗人格障碍患者应咨询主管,尤其是当心理治疗师对患者表现出消极态度时。一般来说,很少有针对BPD的去污名化干预措施经过研究验证。有限的证据表明,对医疗保健提供者进行有针对性的培训可以减少污名化态度,将康复潜力的积极信息与疾病的生物学病因相结合的干预措施在减少污名方面最具影响力。结论:BPD通常被普通人群和心理健康专业人员污名化。消除耻辱的努力需要解决耻辱的主要来源,即普通民众缺乏理解和对医疗保健提供者的悲观信念。需要对污名进行更多针对BPD的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信