No Visitors: Family Perceptions of Separation From Hospitalized Loved Ones.

IF 1.4 Q3 NURSING
Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing Pub Date : 2023-11-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-04 DOI:10.1097/DCC.0000000000000605
Stacey L Knight, Ruthie Robinson, Cynthia Stinson
{"title":"No Visitors: Family Perceptions of Separation From Hospitalized Loved Ones.","authors":"Stacey L Knight,&nbsp;Ruthie Robinson,&nbsp;Cynthia Stinson","doi":"10.1097/DCC.0000000000000605","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/introduction: </strong>Restrictions on visitors during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic had major implications for both patients and families, impacting health care outcomes. Policies included mandatory closures, masking, and visiting restrictions both in acute and long-term care. Despite visiting restrictions in health care systems, little is known about its effects.</p><p><strong>Objectives/aims: </strong>The objective of this study was to elicit perceptions of individuals who were separated from their loved ones during acute care hospitalization during the COVID pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Individuals who experienced separation from hospitalized family members because of the \"no-visitor policies\" during the COVID-19 pandemic were asked to participate in a study to elicit their perceptions. After institutional review board approval, interviews were completed for those who had loved ones admitted to acute care facilities only. Audiotaped and transcribed interviews were conducted in person, via telephone, or virtually using a primary investigator-developed interview guide. Using the Colaizzi method of analysis, themes were derived.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 11 completed interviews, 100% of participants were female, and all were residents of Texas. Themes derived from this pilot project were advocacy, communication, emotional upheaval, human factors, isolation, and abandonment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings from patient interviews support previous published studies. Ideas for improved patient and family experience discussed by the authors include personal protective equipment for significant others, consideration of visitation policies for those patients without decision-making capabilities, and increased accessibility to communication aids for both patients and families.</p>","PeriodicalId":46646,"journal":{"name":"Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/DCC.0000000000000605","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/introduction: Restrictions on visitors during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic had major implications for both patients and families, impacting health care outcomes. Policies included mandatory closures, masking, and visiting restrictions both in acute and long-term care. Despite visiting restrictions in health care systems, little is known about its effects.

Objectives/aims: The objective of this study was to elicit perceptions of individuals who were separated from their loved ones during acute care hospitalization during the COVID pandemic.

Methods: Individuals who experienced separation from hospitalized family members because of the "no-visitor policies" during the COVID-19 pandemic were asked to participate in a study to elicit their perceptions. After institutional review board approval, interviews were completed for those who had loved ones admitted to acute care facilities only. Audiotaped and transcribed interviews were conducted in person, via telephone, or virtually using a primary investigator-developed interview guide. Using the Colaizzi method of analysis, themes were derived.

Results: Of the 11 completed interviews, 100% of participants were female, and all were residents of Texas. Themes derived from this pilot project were advocacy, communication, emotional upheaval, human factors, isolation, and abandonment.

Conclusions: Findings from patient interviews support previous published studies. Ideas for improved patient and family experience discussed by the authors include personal protective equipment for significant others, consideration of visitation policies for those patients without decision-making capabilities, and increased accessibility to communication aids for both patients and families.

没有访客:家人对与住院亲人分离的看法。
背景/简介:2019冠状病毒病(新冠肺炎)大流行期间对访客的限制对患者和家庭都有重大影响,影响了医疗保健结果。政策包括在急性和长期护理中强制关闭、戴口罩和探视限制。尽管医疗保健系统中存在探视限制,但人们对其影响知之甚少。目的/目的:本研究的目的是引发人们对在新冠肺炎疫情期间急性护理住院期间与亲人分离的个人的看法。方法:在新冠肺炎大流行期间,因“禁止探访政策”而与住院家庭成员分离的个人被要求参与一项研究,以引出他们的看法。在机构审查委员会批准后,只对那些有亲人入住急性护理机构的人进行了面谈。录音和转录采访是亲自、通过电话或虚拟地使用主要调查员开发的采访指南进行的。使用Colaizzi分析方法,得出主题。结果:在完成的11次访谈中,100%的参与者是女性,并且都是德克萨斯州的居民。这个试点项目的主题是倡导、沟通、情感动荡、人为因素、孤立和遗弃。结论:患者访谈结果支持先前发表的研究。作者讨论的改善患者和家庭体验的想法包括为重要他人提供个人防护设备,考虑为那些没有决策能力的患者制定探视政策,以及增加患者和家庭获得通信辅助设备的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
102
期刊介绍: The primary purpose of Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing™ is to provide nurses with accurate, current, and relevant information and services to excel in critical care practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信