Improving community-based COPD care in general practice in Poland - a cluster randomized controlled trial.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Anna Kowalczyk, Izabela Zakowska, Ewa Andrzejewska, Jacek Grabowski, Maciek Godycki-Cwirko, Katarzyna Kosiek
{"title":"Improving community-based COPD care in general practice in Poland - a cluster randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Anna Kowalczyk,&nbsp;Izabela Zakowska,&nbsp;Ewa Andrzejewska,&nbsp;Jacek Grabowski,&nbsp;Maciek Godycki-Cwirko,&nbsp;Katarzyna Kosiek","doi":"10.26444/aaem/163200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction and objective: </strong>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is the third leading cause of death worldwide. The aim of the study was to evaluate the impact of intervention on exacerbations of COPD in elderly patients compared to those receiving usual care.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A 12 month, multicentre, three-arm, pragmatic, cluster randomized controlled trial was performed (CRCT). The 97 largest PHC clinics with at least 46 COPD registered patients in the Łódż Province, in central Poland. In total, 27,534 COPD patients aged 65 and over were identified from the National Health Fund (NFZ) electronic health records. A checklist of selected, recommended COPD interventions sent to GPs once or twice by post and shown on their desk in their clinics, in the intervention arms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A primary outcome was the difference in exacerbations or deaths between the 3 arms at 12 months. The amounts of specific short- and long-acting drugs purchased by patients were also assessed as secondary outcomes. Only 0.44% (122 of 27 534) COPD patients demonstrated exacerbations after the one-year study period. No statistically significant associations were found between interventions and exacerbations (p=0.1568, Chi-Square) or deaths (p=0.8128, Chi-Square) at 12 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>As this study coincided with the pandemic period, the results should be interpreted with care. The intervention had no association with exacerbations. Future research on interventions aimed at improving chronic illness care are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":50970,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine","volume":"30 3","pages":"399-406"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26444/aaem/163200","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction and objective: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is the third leading cause of death worldwide. The aim of the study was to evaluate the impact of intervention on exacerbations of COPD in elderly patients compared to those receiving usual care.

Material and methods: A 12 month, multicentre, three-arm, pragmatic, cluster randomized controlled trial was performed (CRCT). The 97 largest PHC clinics with at least 46 COPD registered patients in the Łódż Province, in central Poland. In total, 27,534 COPD patients aged 65 and over were identified from the National Health Fund (NFZ) electronic health records. A checklist of selected, recommended COPD interventions sent to GPs once or twice by post and shown on their desk in their clinics, in the intervention arms.

Results: A primary outcome was the difference in exacerbations or deaths between the 3 arms at 12 months. The amounts of specific short- and long-acting drugs purchased by patients were also assessed as secondary outcomes. Only 0.44% (122 of 27 534) COPD patients demonstrated exacerbations after the one-year study period. No statistically significant associations were found between interventions and exacerbations (p=0.1568, Chi-Square) or deaths (p=0.8128, Chi-Square) at 12 months.

Conclusions: As this study coincided with the pandemic period, the results should be interpreted with care. The intervention had no association with exacerbations. Future research on interventions aimed at improving chronic illness care are needed.

波兰全科医学中改善社区COPD护理——一项集群随机对照试验。
引言和目的:慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)是全球第三大死亡原因。该研究的目的是评估与接受常规护理的老年患者相比,干预对COPD恶化的影响。材料和方法:进行了一项为期12个月的多中心、三组、实用性、整群随机对照试验(CRCT)。波兰中部的Łódż省有97家最大的初级保健诊所,至少有46名COPD患者登记在册。从国家卫生基金(NFZ)的电子健康记录中,总共确认了27534名65岁及以上的COPD患者。一份选定的、推荐的COPD干预措施清单通过邮寄一到两次发送给全科医生,并显示在他们诊所的桌子上。结果:主要结果是3组患者在12个月时病情恶化或死亡的差异。患者购买的特定短期和长期药物的数量也被评估为次要结果。在一年的研究期后,只有0.44%(27534名患者中的122名)的COPD患者表现出病情恶化。干预措施与12个月时的病情恶化(p=0.1568,卡方)或死亡(p=0.8128,卡方)之间没有发现统计学上显著的相关性。结论:由于这项研究恰逢疫情期间,应谨慎解读结果。干预措施与病情恶化无关。未来需要对旨在改善慢性病护理的干预措施进行研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine
Annals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
58
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: All papers within the scope indicated by the following sections of the journal may be submitted: Biological agents posing occupational risk in agriculture, forestry, food industry and wood industry and diseases caused by these agents (zoonoses, allergic and immunotoxic diseases). Health effects of chemical pollutants in agricultural areas , including occupational and non-occupational effects of agricultural chemicals (pesticides, fertilizers) and effects of industrial disposal (heavy metals, sulphur, etc.) contaminating the atmosphere, soil and water. Exposure to physical hazards associated with the use of machinery in agriculture and forestry: noise, vibration, dust. Prevention of occupational diseases in agriculture, forestry, food industry and wood industry. Work-related accidents and injuries in agriculture, forestry, food industry and wood industry: incidence, causes, social aspects and prevention. State of the health of rural communities depending on various factors: social factors, accessibility of medical care, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信