Operating microscope-assisted reconstructive strategy for peri-implantitis: A case series report

IF 0.9 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Yi-Chen Chiang, Benyapha Sirinirund, Amanda Rodriguez, Diego Velasquez, Hsun-Liang Chan
{"title":"Operating microscope-assisted reconstructive strategy for peri-implantitis: A case series report","authors":"Yi-Chen Chiang,&nbsp;Benyapha Sirinirund,&nbsp;Amanda Rodriguez,&nbsp;Diego Velasquez,&nbsp;Hsun-Liang Chan","doi":"10.1002/cap.10265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Treating peri-implantitis with reconstructive means has been largely unpredictable due to access limitations for surface decontamination, unfavorable bony topography, difficulty in achieving wound stability, and inferior soft tissue qualities. A microsurgical approach with the use of the operating microscope (OM) that provides adjustable higher magnification (∼5–30 times) and coaxial illumination, coupled with the use of microsurgical instruments, may overcome, or alleviate some of the abovementioned obstacles, resulting in more predictable outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Three patients received reconstructive therapy for correcting peri-implant defects under OM in private practice settings. After precise incisions to preserve soft tissue volume, the flaps were dissected prudently from underlying granulomatous tissues, which were subsequently removed, followed by controlled flap releasing under ∼10–15x magnification. Surface decontamination was performed using a piezoelectric ultrasonic device, air polishing, and hand instruments at ∼30x magnification. The biomaterial selections were dehydrated human de-epithelialized amnion-chorion membrane with mineralized allograft particulates in two cases and xenografts in one case, based on the surgeons’ preference. Wound closure followed the non-submerged approach.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>These cases demonstrated uneventful soft tissue healing, favorable radiographic bone fill, and disease resolution with follow-ups ranging from 2 to 4 years.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Preliminary data suggest encouraging outcomes after the microsurgical approach following biological as well as biomechanical principles for peri-implant defect reconstruction.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55950,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Advances in Periodontics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Advances in Periodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cap.10265","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Treating peri-implantitis with reconstructive means has been largely unpredictable due to access limitations for surface decontamination, unfavorable bony topography, difficulty in achieving wound stability, and inferior soft tissue qualities. A microsurgical approach with the use of the operating microscope (OM) that provides adjustable higher magnification (∼5–30 times) and coaxial illumination, coupled with the use of microsurgical instruments, may overcome, or alleviate some of the abovementioned obstacles, resulting in more predictable outcomes.

Methods

Three patients received reconstructive therapy for correcting peri-implant defects under OM in private practice settings. After precise incisions to preserve soft tissue volume, the flaps were dissected prudently from underlying granulomatous tissues, which were subsequently removed, followed by controlled flap releasing under ∼10–15x magnification. Surface decontamination was performed using a piezoelectric ultrasonic device, air polishing, and hand instruments at ∼30x magnification. The biomaterial selections were dehydrated human de-epithelialized amnion-chorion membrane with mineralized allograft particulates in two cases and xenografts in one case, based on the surgeons’ preference. Wound closure followed the non-submerged approach.

Results

These cases demonstrated uneventful soft tissue healing, favorable radiographic bone fill, and disease resolution with follow-ups ranging from 2 to 4 years.

Conclusions

Preliminary data suggest encouraging outcomes after the microsurgical approach following biological as well as biomechanical principles for peri-implant defect reconstruction.

种植体周围炎的手术显微镜辅助重建策略:一例系列报告。
背景:由于表面去污的途径限制、不利的骨地形、难以实现伤口稳定性和较差的软组织质量,用重建方法治疗种植体周围炎在很大程度上是不可预测的。使用手术显微镜(OM)提供可调节的更高放大率(~5-30倍)和同轴照明的显微外科方法,再加上使用显微外科仪器,可以克服或减轻上述一些障碍,从而产生更可预测的结果。方法:三名患者在私人诊所接受OM下修复种植体周围缺陷的重建治疗。在精确切割以保持软组织体积后,从下方的肉芽肿组织中谨慎地解剖皮瓣,随后将其移除,然后在约10-15倍的放大倍数下控制皮瓣释放。表面去污使用压电超声波设备、空气抛光和手动仪器进行,放大倍数为~30倍。根据外科医生的偏好,生物材料的选择是两例带有矿化同种异体移植物颗粒的脱水人去上皮化羊膜绒毛膜和一例异种移植物。伤口闭合采用非水下入路。结果:这些病例表现出平稳的软组织愈合、良好的放射学骨填充和疾病的解决,随访时间为2-4年。结论:初步数据表明,根据生物学和生物力学原理,显微外科手术后植入物周围缺损重建的结果令人鼓舞。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Advances in Periodontics
Clinical Advances in Periodontics DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信