Algorithmically Reconstructed Molecular Pathways as the New Generation of Prognostic Molecular Biomarkers in Human Solid Cancers.

IF 4 Q2 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Marianna Zolotovskaia, Maks Kovalenko, Polina Pugacheva, Victor Tkachev, Alexander Simonov, Maxim Sorokin, Alexander Seryakov, Andrew Garazha, Nurshat Gaifullin, Marina Sekacheva, Galina Zakharova, Anton A Buzdin
{"title":"Algorithmically Reconstructed Molecular Pathways as the New Generation of Prognostic Molecular Biomarkers in Human Solid Cancers.","authors":"Marianna Zolotovskaia,&nbsp;Maks Kovalenko,&nbsp;Polina Pugacheva,&nbsp;Victor Tkachev,&nbsp;Alexander Simonov,&nbsp;Maxim Sorokin,&nbsp;Alexander Seryakov,&nbsp;Andrew Garazha,&nbsp;Nurshat Gaifullin,&nbsp;Marina Sekacheva,&nbsp;Galina Zakharova,&nbsp;Anton A Buzdin","doi":"10.3390/proteomes11030026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Individual gene expression and molecular pathway activation profiles were shown to be effective biomarkers in many cancers. Here, we used the human interactome model to algorithmically build 7470 molecular pathways centered around individual gene products. We assessed their associations with tumor type and survival in comparison with the previous generation of molecular pathway biomarkers (3022 \"classical\" pathways) and with the RNA transcripts or proteomic profiles of individual genes, for 8141 and 1117 samples, respectively. For all analytes in RNA and proteomic data, respectively, we found a total of 7441 and 7343 potential biomarker associations for gene-centric pathways, 3020 and 2950 for classical pathways, and 24,349 and 6742 for individual genes. Overall, the percentage of RNA biomarkers was statistically significantly higher for both types of pathways than for individual genes (<i>p</i> < 0.05). In turn, both types of pathways showed comparable performance. The percentage of cancer-type-specific biomarkers was comparable between proteomic and transcriptomic levels, but the proportion of survival biomarkers was dramatically lower for proteomic data. Thus, we conclude that pathway activation level is the advanced type of biomarker for RNA and proteomic data, and momentary algorithmic computer building of pathways is a new credible alternative to time-consuming hypothesis-driven manual pathway curation and reconstruction.</p>","PeriodicalId":20877,"journal":{"name":"Proteomes","volume":"11 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10535530/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proteomes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/proteomes11030026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Individual gene expression and molecular pathway activation profiles were shown to be effective biomarkers in many cancers. Here, we used the human interactome model to algorithmically build 7470 molecular pathways centered around individual gene products. We assessed their associations with tumor type and survival in comparison with the previous generation of molecular pathway biomarkers (3022 "classical" pathways) and with the RNA transcripts or proteomic profiles of individual genes, for 8141 and 1117 samples, respectively. For all analytes in RNA and proteomic data, respectively, we found a total of 7441 and 7343 potential biomarker associations for gene-centric pathways, 3020 and 2950 for classical pathways, and 24,349 and 6742 for individual genes. Overall, the percentage of RNA biomarkers was statistically significantly higher for both types of pathways than for individual genes (p < 0.05). In turn, both types of pathways showed comparable performance. The percentage of cancer-type-specific biomarkers was comparable between proteomic and transcriptomic levels, but the proportion of survival biomarkers was dramatically lower for proteomic data. Thus, we conclude that pathway activation level is the advanced type of biomarker for RNA and proteomic data, and momentary algorithmic computer building of pathways is a new credible alternative to time-consuming hypothesis-driven manual pathway curation and reconstruction.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

作为人类实体癌中新一代预测分子生物标志物的算法重建分子通路。
个体基因表达和分子通路激活谱被证明是许多癌症的有效生物标志物。在这里,我们使用人类相互作用模型以算法构建了7470个以单个基因产物为中心的分子通路。我们分别对8141和1117个样本,与上一代分子途径生物标志物(3022个“经典”途径)和单个基因的RNA转录物或蛋白质组学图谱进行了比较,评估了它们与肿瘤类型和生存率的关系。对于RNA和蛋白质组学数据中的所有分析物,我们分别发现基因中心途径共有7441和7343个潜在的生物标志物关联,经典途径分别有3020和2950个,单个基因分别有24349和6742个。总体而言,两种途径的RNA生物标志物百分比在统计学上均显著高于单个基因(p<0.05)。反过来,两种类型的途径表现出相当的性能。在蛋白质组和转录组水平之间,癌症类型特异性生物标志物的百分比是可比的,但在蛋白质组数据中,存活生物标记物的比例显著较低。因此,我们得出结论,通路激活水平是RNA和蛋白质组数据的高级生物标志物,通路的瞬时算法计算机构建是耗时的假设驱动的手动通路管理和重建的一种新的可信替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Proteomes
Proteomes Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Clinical Biochemistry
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
3.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Proteomes (ISSN 2227-7382) is an open access, peer reviewed journal on all aspects of proteome science. Proteomes covers the multi-disciplinary topics of structural and functional biology, protein chemistry, cell biology, methodology used for protein analysis, including mass spectrometry, protein arrays, bioinformatics, HTS assays, etc. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. Therefore, there is no restriction on the length of papers. Scope: -whole proteome analysis of any organism -disease/pharmaceutical studies -comparative proteomics -protein-ligand/protein interactions -structure/functional proteomics -gene expression -methodology -bioinformatics -applications of proteomics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信