Efficacy and safety of self-expanding metal stents in patients with inoperable esophageal cancer: a real-life study.

IF 3 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Therapeutic Advances in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Pub Date : 2023-09-26 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1177/26317745231200975
José Miguel Jiménez-Gutiérrez, Juan Octavio Alonso-Lárraga, Angélica I Hernández-Guerrero, Leonardo Saul Lino-Silva, Antonio Olivas-Martinez
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of self-expanding metal stents in patients with inoperable esophageal cancer: a real-life study.","authors":"José Miguel Jiménez-Gutiérrez,&nbsp;Juan Octavio Alonso-Lárraga,&nbsp;Angélica I Hernández-Guerrero,&nbsp;Leonardo Saul Lino-Silva,&nbsp;Antonio Olivas-Martinez","doi":"10.1177/26317745231200975","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dysphagia is the most frequent symptom in patients diagnosed with esophageal cancer. Self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) are the current palliative treatment of choice for dysphagia in patients with non-curable esophageal cancer. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and adverse events (AEs) of different types of SEMS for palliation of dysphagia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients with advanced esophageal cancer and SEMS placement for dysphagia palliation in a tertiary care center. The primary outcome was the clinical success defined as an improvement in dysphagia (reduction of at least 2 points in the Mellow-Pinkas scoring system for dysphagia) after SEMS placement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between January 1999 and May 2020, 295 patients with esophageal cancer were identified. Among them, 75 had a SEMS placement for dysphagia palliation. The mean age of the patients was 61.3 years (standard deviation: 13.4), 69 patients (92%) were men, and the mean Mellow-Pinkas scoring for dysphagia pre- and post-SEMS placement were 3.1 and 1.4 (change from baseline -1.7), respectively. Technical success and clinical success were achieved in 98.6% and 58.9%, respectively. AEs were identified in 35/75 patients (46.7%), and SEMS migration was the most frequent AE in 22/75 patients (29.3%). There were no significant differences in improvement in dysphagia (<i>p</i> = 0.054), weight changes (<i>p</i> = 0.78), and AE (<i>p</i> = 0.73) among fully covered SEMS (fc-SEMS) and partially covered SEMS (pc-SEMS). The median follow-up was 89 days (interquartile range: 29-221).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SEMS placement was associated with a rapid improvement in dysphagia, high technical success, and a modest improvement in dysphagia with no major AE among fc-SEMS and pc-SEMS.</p>","PeriodicalId":40947,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy","volume":"16 ","pages":"26317745231200975"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e2/f9/10.1177_26317745231200975.PMC10524049.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26317745231200975","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Dysphagia is the most frequent symptom in patients diagnosed with esophageal cancer. Self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) are the current palliative treatment of choice for dysphagia in patients with non-curable esophageal cancer. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and adverse events (AEs) of different types of SEMS for palliation of dysphagia.

Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients with advanced esophageal cancer and SEMS placement for dysphagia palliation in a tertiary care center. The primary outcome was the clinical success defined as an improvement in dysphagia (reduction of at least 2 points in the Mellow-Pinkas scoring system for dysphagia) after SEMS placement.

Results: Between January 1999 and May 2020, 295 patients with esophageal cancer were identified. Among them, 75 had a SEMS placement for dysphagia palliation. The mean age of the patients was 61.3 years (standard deviation: 13.4), 69 patients (92%) were men, and the mean Mellow-Pinkas scoring for dysphagia pre- and post-SEMS placement were 3.1 and 1.4 (change from baseline -1.7), respectively. Technical success and clinical success were achieved in 98.6% and 58.9%, respectively. AEs were identified in 35/75 patients (46.7%), and SEMS migration was the most frequent AE in 22/75 patients (29.3%). There were no significant differences in improvement in dysphagia (p = 0.054), weight changes (p = 0.78), and AE (p = 0.73) among fully covered SEMS (fc-SEMS) and partially covered SEMS (pc-SEMS). The median follow-up was 89 days (interquartile range: 29-221).

Conclusion: SEMS placement was associated with a rapid improvement in dysphagia, high technical success, and a modest improvement in dysphagia with no major AE among fc-SEMS and pc-SEMS.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

自扩金属支架治疗无法手术的食管癌症患者的疗效和安全性:一项现实研究。
背景:吞咽困难是癌症食管癌患者最常见的症状。自扩式金属支架(SEMS)是目前治疗癌症患者吞咽困难的姑息治疗方法。本研究旨在评估不同类型SEMS缓解吞咽困难的疗效和不良事件(AE)。方法:我们对癌症晚期食管癌患者进行了回顾性队列研究,并在三级护理中心放置SEMS缓解吞咽困难。主要结果是临床成功,定义为吞咽困难的改善(至少减少2 Mellow Pinkas吞咽困难评分系统中的分数)。结果:1999年1月至2020年5月,共发现295例癌症食管癌患者。其中,75例因吞咽困难缓解而进行了SEMS置入术。患者的平均年龄为61.3岁 年(标准差:13.4),69名患者(92%)为男性,SEMS植入前和植入后吞咽困难的平均Mellow-Pinkas评分分别为3.1和1.4(与基线相比变化为1.7)。技术成功率和临床成功率分别为98.6%和58.9%。在35/75例患者中发现AE(46.7%),SEMS迁移是22/75例患者最常见的AE(29.3%)。在吞咽困难的改善方面没有显著差异(p = 0.054),重量变化(p = 0.78)和AE(p = 0.73)在完全覆盖的SEMS(fc SEMS)和部分覆盖的SEMS(pc SEMS)中。中位随访时间为89 天(四分位间距:29-221)。结论:在fc SEMS和pc SEMS中,放置SEMS与吞咽困难的快速改善、高技术成功率和吞咽困难的适度改善有关,且无主要AE。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信