Comparison of the Overlap between Juvenile Justice Processing and Behavioral Health Screening, Assessment and Referral.

Diana Bowser, Brandy F Henry, Gail A Wasserman, Danica Knight, Sheena Gardner, Kate Krupka, Bill Grossi, Margaret Cawood, Tisha Wiley, Angela Robertson
{"title":"Comparison of the Overlap between Juvenile Justice Processing and Behavioral Health Screening, Assessment and Referral.","authors":"Diana Bowser,&nbsp;Brandy F Henry,&nbsp;Gail A Wasserman,&nbsp;Danica Knight,&nbsp;Sheena Gardner,&nbsp;Kate Krupka,&nbsp;Bill Grossi,&nbsp;Margaret Cawood,&nbsp;Tisha Wiley,&nbsp;Angela Robertson","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Given the large proportion of youth involved in the juvenile justice system who meet criteria for behavioral health disorders, the system is charged with delivering not only criminal justice programing, but also behavioral health services. Behavioral health service delivery is typically done through collaborative partnerships with behavioral health agencies. This study created process maps which describe the flows and boundaries of these partnerships with respect to screening, assessment and referral to treatment. Process maps of juvenile justice and behavioral health systems from six juvenile departments in different states (Mississippi, Kentucky, New York, Georgia, Texas, and Pennsylvania) are presented. Both the methodology of creating process maps and results from the analysis of the maps are presented. Results indicate that behavioral health screening, assessment, and referral to treatment were occurring at all sites, typically with standardized tools. Overall trends were that juveniles tended to have more screenings, assessments, and referrals to behavioral health services as they moved deeper into the juvenile justice system and were placed into more formal juvenile justice services. Within the analysis of interagency communication, these results were mirrored; settings that were more formal and located deeper into the juvenile justice system had more robust interagency communication.</p>","PeriodicalId":73606,"journal":{"name":"Journal of applied juvenile justice services","volume":"2018 ","pages":"97-125"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6342497/pdf/nihms-1002791.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of applied juvenile justice services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Given the large proportion of youth involved in the juvenile justice system who meet criteria for behavioral health disorders, the system is charged with delivering not only criminal justice programing, but also behavioral health services. Behavioral health service delivery is typically done through collaborative partnerships with behavioral health agencies. This study created process maps which describe the flows and boundaries of these partnerships with respect to screening, assessment and referral to treatment. Process maps of juvenile justice and behavioral health systems from six juvenile departments in different states (Mississippi, Kentucky, New York, Georgia, Texas, and Pennsylvania) are presented. Both the methodology of creating process maps and results from the analysis of the maps are presented. Results indicate that behavioral health screening, assessment, and referral to treatment were occurring at all sites, typically with standardized tools. Overall trends were that juveniles tended to have more screenings, assessments, and referrals to behavioral health services as they moved deeper into the juvenile justice system and were placed into more formal juvenile justice services. Within the analysis of interagency communication, these results were mirrored; settings that were more formal and located deeper into the juvenile justice system had more robust interagency communication.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

青少年司法处理与行为健康筛查、评估和转介之间重叠的比较。
鉴于参与少年司法系统的青少年中有很大一部分符合行为健康障碍标准,该系统不仅负责提供刑事司法计划,还负责提供行为健康服务。行为健康服务的提供通常是通过与行为健康机构的合作伙伴关系来完成的。这项研究创建了流程图,描述了这些伙伴关系在筛查、评估和转诊治疗方面的流程和边界。介绍了来自不同州(密西西比州、肯塔基州、纽约州、佐治亚州、得克萨斯州和宾夕法尼亚州)六个青少年部门的青少年司法和行为健康系统的流程图。介绍了创建流程图的方法和流程图分析的结果。结果表明,所有地点都进行了行为健康筛查、评估和转诊治疗,通常使用标准化工具。总体趋势是,随着青少年深入青少年司法系统并被纳入更正式的青少年司法服务,他们往往会接受更多的筛查、评估和转介到行为健康服务机构。在对机构间沟通的分析中,这些结果得到了反映;更正式、更深入青少年司法系统的环境有更强有力的跨部门沟通。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信