Minimally invasive recipient procedure in kidney transplantation.

Q4 Medicine
Yoshifumi Miura, Yuki Nakafusa, Naoko Yokota-Ikeda, Mitsue Ota, Naoki Otomo
{"title":"Minimally invasive recipient procedure in kidney transplantation.","authors":"Yoshifumi Miura,&nbsp;Yuki Nakafusa,&nbsp;Naoko Yokota-Ikeda,&nbsp;Mitsue Ota,&nbsp;Naoki Otomo","doi":"10.4285/kjt.23.0022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There are several procedural variations for kidney transplant donors, including open, laparoscopic, hand-assisted, and robotic methods, with either an intra- abdominal or retroperitoneal approach. Conversely, fewer options are available for the recipient procedure. We introduce a method that involves a small incision, with the goal of being less invasive for recipients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our current method was introduced in April 2022. As of July 2023, we have completed 27 cases. We analyzed several factors in these 27 cases, including the size of the incision, rewarming time, anastomosis time, graft function, analgesic use, and complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average incision size was 73 mm. The time taken for anastomosis was 24. 1 minutes, while the rewarming time averaged 43.1 minutes. There were no instances of primary nonfunction. One case necessitated postoperative dialysis three times due to heart failure. Following stent removal, one patient developed grade 1 hydronephrosis. There was one instance of bleeding from the drain insertion site. Another case involved a clamp injury to the external iliac artery, which necessitated stent insertion on the fourth postoperative day. Compared to procedures performed using conventional methods, the use of analgesics was less in these cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our minimally invasive technique, which involves a small incision, is a feasible alternative that could potentially be less invasive than traditional methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":33357,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Transplantation","volume":"37 3","pages":"165-169"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/3e/a5/kjt-37-3-165.PMC10583972.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4285/kjt.23.0022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There are several procedural variations for kidney transplant donors, including open, laparoscopic, hand-assisted, and robotic methods, with either an intra- abdominal or retroperitoneal approach. Conversely, fewer options are available for the recipient procedure. We introduce a method that involves a small incision, with the goal of being less invasive for recipients.

Methods: Our current method was introduced in April 2022. As of July 2023, we have completed 27 cases. We analyzed several factors in these 27 cases, including the size of the incision, rewarming time, anastomosis time, graft function, analgesic use, and complications.

Results: The average incision size was 73 mm. The time taken for anastomosis was 24. 1 minutes, while the rewarming time averaged 43.1 minutes. There were no instances of primary nonfunction. One case necessitated postoperative dialysis three times due to heart failure. Following stent removal, one patient developed grade 1 hydronephrosis. There was one instance of bleeding from the drain insertion site. Another case involved a clamp injury to the external iliac artery, which necessitated stent insertion on the fourth postoperative day. Compared to procedures performed using conventional methods, the use of analgesics was less in these cases.

Conclusions: Our minimally invasive technique, which involves a small incision, is a feasible alternative that could potentially be less invasive than traditional methods.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

肾移植中的微创受体程序。
背景:肾移植供体有几种不同的手术方法,包括开放式、腹腔镜、手辅助和机器人方法,可采用腹腔内或腹膜后方法。相反,可用于接受者程序的选项较少。我们介绍了一种小切口的方法,目的是减少接受者的侵入性。方法:我们目前的方法于2022年4月引入。截至2023年7月,我们已经完成了27起案件。我们分析了这27例病例的几个因素,包括切口大小、复温时间、吻合时间、移植物功能、镇痛作用和并发症。结果:平均切口尺寸为73 mm,吻合时间为24小时。复温时间平均为43.1分钟。没有出现原发性功能不全的情况。一例因心力衰竭需要术后透析三次。支架移除后,一名患者出现1级肾积水。有一例引流管插入部位出血。另一个病例涉及髂外动脉夹伤,需要在术后第四天插入支架。与使用传统方法进行的手术相比,在这些病例中镇痛药的使用较少。结论:我们的微创技术涉及小切口,是一种可行的替代方法,可能比传统方法的微创性更小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Korean Journal of Transplantation
Korean Journal of Transplantation Medicine-Transplantation
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信