Prehospital Critical Care Blood Product Administration: Quantifying Clinical Benefit.

IF 1.4 Q3 NURSING
Randall Hough, Sylvan Charles Cox, Erica Chimelski, Fred G Mihm, Joshua M Tobin
{"title":"Prehospital Critical Care Blood Product Administration: Quantifying Clinical Benefit.","authors":"Randall Hough, Sylvan Charles Cox, Erica Chimelski, Fred G Mihm, Joshua M Tobin","doi":"10.1097/DCC.0000000000000608","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Prehospital blood transfusion has been widely practiced in the military and is drawing renewed scrutiny after many years of civilian use. Objective The objective of this article is to quantify the benefit derived from prehospital transfusion of blood products. Methods Deidentified data were extracted retrospectively from the flight records of a critical care transportation program between April 2018 and January 2020. Patients who were transported before a prehospital blood transfusion protocol were compared with patients after initiation of the blood transfusion protocol. Demographic data, vital signs, laboratory analytics, and other outcome measures were analyzed. Results Nine scene transport patients who met the transfusion criteria before a blood transfusion protocol were compared with 11 patients transported after initiation of the protocol. Identical outcome measures were analyzed. Patients who received prehospital blood transfusions had a statistically significantly longer hospital length of stay (16.5 vs 3.7 days, P = .03) and were more often taken directly to the operating room (80% vs 28%, P = .04). No statistically significant difference was identified when comparing mean arterial pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, hemoglobin, hematocrit, or survival to hospital discharge. Conclusions Trauma patients who received prehospital blood transfusion had a longer hospital length of stay and were more often taken directly to the operating room, but without improvement in survival.","PeriodicalId":46646,"journal":{"name":"Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/DCC.0000000000000608","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Prehospital blood transfusion has been widely practiced in the military and is drawing renewed scrutiny after many years of civilian use. Objective The objective of this article is to quantify the benefit derived from prehospital transfusion of blood products. Methods Deidentified data were extracted retrospectively from the flight records of a critical care transportation program between April 2018 and January 2020. Patients who were transported before a prehospital blood transfusion protocol were compared with patients after initiation of the blood transfusion protocol. Demographic data, vital signs, laboratory analytics, and other outcome measures were analyzed. Results Nine scene transport patients who met the transfusion criteria before a blood transfusion protocol were compared with 11 patients transported after initiation of the protocol. Identical outcome measures were analyzed. Patients who received prehospital blood transfusions had a statistically significantly longer hospital length of stay (16.5 vs 3.7 days, P = .03) and were more often taken directly to the operating room (80% vs 28%, P = .04). No statistically significant difference was identified when comparing mean arterial pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, hemoglobin, hematocrit, or survival to hospital discharge. Conclusions Trauma patients who received prehospital blood transfusion had a longer hospital length of stay and were more often taken directly to the operating room, but without improvement in survival.
院前重症监护血液制品管理:量化临床效益。
背景:院前输血在军队中得到了广泛的应用,在民用多年后再次受到关注。目的:本文的目的是量化院前输血血液制品的益处。方法:从2018年4月至2020年1月期间一个重症监护运输项目的飞行记录中回顾性提取未识别数据。将在院前输血方案之前运送的患者与输血方案开始后的患者进行比较。对人口统计学数据、生命体征、实验室分析和其他结果测量进行了分析。结果:将9名在输血方案前符合输血标准的现场转运患者与11名在方案启动后转运的患者进行比较。对相同的结果指标进行了分析。接受院前输血的患者住院时间在统计学上显著延长(16.5天vs 3.7天,P=0.03),并且更经常被直接带到手术室(80%vs 28%,P=0.04)。在比较平均动脉压、心率、呼吸频率、血红蛋白、红细胞压积,或存活到出院。结论:接受院前输血的创伤患者住院时间更长,更经常被直接带到手术室,但存活率没有提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
102
期刊介绍: The primary purpose of Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing™ is to provide nurses with accurate, current, and relevant information and services to excel in critical care practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信