Performance of a deep learning enhancement method applied to PET images acquired with a reduced acquisition time.

IF 0.6 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Krzysztof Ciborowski, Anna Gramek-Jedwabna, Monika Gołąb, Izabela Miechowicz, Jolanta Szczurek, Marek Ruchała, Rafał Czepczyński
{"title":"Performance of a deep learning enhancement method applied to PET images acquired with a reduced acquisition time.","authors":"Krzysztof Ciborowski,&nbsp;Anna Gramek-Jedwabna,&nbsp;Monika Gołąb,&nbsp;Izabela Miechowicz,&nbsp;Jolanta Szczurek,&nbsp;Marek Ruchała,&nbsp;Rafał Czepczyński","doi":"10.5603/nmr.94482","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the performance of a deep learning enhancement method in PET images reconstructed with a shorter acquisition time, and different reconstruction algorithms. The impact of the enhancement on clinical decisions was also assessed.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Thirty-seven subjects underwent clinical whole-body [18F]FDG PET/CT exams with an acquisition time of 1.5 min per bed position. PET images were reconstructed with the OSEM algorithm using 66% counts (imitating 1 min/bed acquisition time) and 100% counts (1.5 min/bed). Images reconstructed from 66% counts were subsequently enhanced using the SubtlePET™ (SP) deep-learning-based software, (Subtle Medical, USA) - with two different software versions (SP1 and SP2). Additionally, images obtained with 66% counts were reconstructed with QClear™ (GE, USA) algorithm and enhanced with SP2. Volumes of interest (VOI) of the lesions and reference VOIs in the liver, brain, bladder, and mediastinum were drawn on OSEM images and copied on SP images. Quantitative SUVmax values per VOI of OSEM or QClear™ and AI-enhanced 'shortened' acquisitions were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two hundred and fifty-two VOIs were identified (37 for each reference region, and 104 for the lesions) for OSEM, SP1, SP2, and QClear™ images AI-enhanced with SP2. SUVmax values on SP1 images were lower than standard OSEM, but on SP2 differences were smaller (average difference for SP1 11.6%, for SP2 -4.5%). For images reconstructed with QClear™, SUVmax values were higher (average +8.9%, median 6.1%, SD 18.9%). For small lesions with SUVmax values range 2.0 to 4.0 decrease of measured SUVmax was much less significant with SP2 (for liver average -6.5%, median -5.6% for lesions average -5.6%, median - 6.0, SD 5.2%) and showed the best correlation with original OSEM. While no artifacts and good general diagnostic confidence were found in AI-enhanced images, SP1, the images were not equal to the original OSEM - some lesions were hard to spot. SP2 produced images with almost the same quality as the original 1.5 min/bed OSEM reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The studied deep learning enhancement method can be used to accelerate PET acquisitions without compromising quantitative SUVmax values. AI-based algorithms can enhance the image quality of accelerated PET acquisitions, enabling the dose reduction to the patients and improving the cost-effectiveness of PET/CT imaging.</p>","PeriodicalId":44718,"journal":{"name":"NUCLEAR MEDICINE REVIEW","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NUCLEAR MEDICINE REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5603/nmr.94482","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aims to evaluate the performance of a deep learning enhancement method in PET images reconstructed with a shorter acquisition time, and different reconstruction algorithms. The impact of the enhancement on clinical decisions was also assessed.

Material and methods: Thirty-seven subjects underwent clinical whole-body [18F]FDG PET/CT exams with an acquisition time of 1.5 min per bed position. PET images were reconstructed with the OSEM algorithm using 66% counts (imitating 1 min/bed acquisition time) and 100% counts (1.5 min/bed). Images reconstructed from 66% counts were subsequently enhanced using the SubtlePET™ (SP) deep-learning-based software, (Subtle Medical, USA) - with two different software versions (SP1 and SP2). Additionally, images obtained with 66% counts were reconstructed with QClear™ (GE, USA) algorithm and enhanced with SP2. Volumes of interest (VOI) of the lesions and reference VOIs in the liver, brain, bladder, and mediastinum were drawn on OSEM images and copied on SP images. Quantitative SUVmax values per VOI of OSEM or QClear™ and AI-enhanced 'shortened' acquisitions were compared.

Results: Two hundred and fifty-two VOIs were identified (37 for each reference region, and 104 for the lesions) for OSEM, SP1, SP2, and QClear™ images AI-enhanced with SP2. SUVmax values on SP1 images were lower than standard OSEM, but on SP2 differences were smaller (average difference for SP1 11.6%, for SP2 -4.5%). For images reconstructed with QClear™, SUVmax values were higher (average +8.9%, median 6.1%, SD 18.9%). For small lesions with SUVmax values range 2.0 to 4.0 decrease of measured SUVmax was much less significant with SP2 (for liver average -6.5%, median -5.6% for lesions average -5.6%, median - 6.0, SD 5.2%) and showed the best correlation with original OSEM. While no artifacts and good general diagnostic confidence were found in AI-enhanced images, SP1, the images were not equal to the original OSEM - some lesions were hard to spot. SP2 produced images with almost the same quality as the original 1.5 min/bed OSEM reconstruction.

Conclusions: The studied deep learning enhancement method can be used to accelerate PET acquisitions without compromising quantitative SUVmax values. AI-based algorithms can enhance the image quality of accelerated PET acquisitions, enabling the dose reduction to the patients and improving the cost-effectiveness of PET/CT imaging.

深度学习增强方法的性能应用于以减少的采集时间采集的PET图像。
背景:本研究旨在评估深度学习增强方法在用较短的采集时间和不同的重建算法重建PET图像中的性能。还评估了增强对临床决策的影响。材料和方法:37名受试者接受了临床全身[18F]FDG PET/CT检查,每个体位的采集时间为1.5分钟。PET图像用OSEM算法重建,使用66%计数(模拟1分钟/床的采集时间)和100%计数(1.5分钟/床)。根据66%计数重建的图像随后使用SubtlePET增强™ (SP)基于深度学习的软件,(美国Subtle Medical)-具有两个不同的软件版本(SP1和SP2)。此外,使用QClear重建了66%计数的图像™ (GE,USA)算法,并用SP2进行了增强。在OSEM图像上绘制肝脏、大脑、膀胱和纵隔中病变和参考VOI的感兴趣体积(VOI),并在SP图像上复制。OSEM或QClear的每个VOI的定量SUVmax值™ 并对人工智能增强的“缩短”采集进行了比较。结果:OSEM、SP1、SP2和QClear共识别出252个VOI(每个参考区域37个,病变104个)™ 图像AI用SP2增强。SP1图像的SUVmax值低于标准OSEM,但SP2的差异较小(SP1的平均差异11.6%,SP2的平均差异-4.5%)™, SUVmax值更高(平均值+8.9%,中位数6.1%,SD 18.9%)。对于SUVmax在2.0至4.0范围内的小病变,测量的SUVmax与SP2的下降不太显著(肝脏平均值-6.5%,病变平均值-5.6%,中位数-6.0,SD 5.2%),并且显示出与原始OSEM的最佳相关性。虽然在AI增强图像SP1中没有发现伪影和良好的总体诊断置信度,但这些图像与原始OSEM不相等——一些病变很难发现。SP2产生的图像具有与原始1.5分钟/床OSEM重建几乎相同的质量。结论:所研究的深度学习增强方法可用于加速PET采集,而不会影响定量SUVmax值。基于AI的算法可以提高加速PET采集的图像质量,减少患者的剂量,提高PET/CT成像的成本效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
NUCLEAR MEDICINE REVIEW
NUCLEAR MEDICINE REVIEW RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: Written in English, NMR is a biannual international periodical of scientific and educational profile. It is a journal of Bulgarian, Czech, Hungarian, Macedonian, Polish, Romanian, Russian, Slovak, Ukrainian and Yugoslav Societies of Nuclear Medicine. The periodical focuses on all nuclear medicine topics (diagnostics as well as therapy), and presents original experimental scientific papers, reviews, case studies, letters also news about symposia and congresses. NMR is indexed at Index Copernicus (7.41), Scopus, EMBASE, Index Medicus/Medline, Ministry of Education 2007 (4 pts.).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信