Content validity of a patient-reported experience measure (CQRA-PREM) for patients with rheumatoid arthritis in Portugal.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 RHEUMATOLOGY
ARP Rheumatology Pub Date : 2023-07-15
Raquel Rainho, Daniela Oliveira, Miguel Bernardes, Lúcia Costa, Carlos Vaz, João Almeida Fonseca, Cristina Jácome
{"title":"Content validity of a patient-reported experience measure (CQRA-PREM) for patients with rheumatoid arthritis in Portugal.","authors":"Raquel Rainho,&nbsp;Daniela Oliveira,&nbsp;Miguel Bernardes,&nbsp;Lúcia Costa,&nbsp;Carlos Vaz,&nbsp;João Almeida Fonseca,&nbsp;Cristina Jácome","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>TBackground: The evaluation of perceptions of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has a positive influence in their health outcomes and overall experience of care. The Commissioning for Quality in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patient-Reported Experience Measure (CQRA-PREM) was developed to provide the perceptions and the feedback of the patients with RA to the health professionals team. This PREM is already validated and in use in the United Kingdom (UK) and Netherlands. In Portugal, there is no validated PREM to evaluate the experience of patients with RA.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To translate, cultural adapt and validate the content of the CQRA-PREM for the Portuguese population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative study using focus groups was conducted to evaluate CQRA-PREM content validity. The CQRA-PREM was first translated and cultural adapted to Portuguese by two researchers, and after back translation, a panel of experts agreed on the preliminary Portuguese version of CQRA-PREM. Patients with RA were recruited from a rheumatology center at a tertiary university hospital center to participate in focus group meetings. Before the focus group they filled in the preliminary version of CQRA-PREM, with its 7 domains and 24 items (Likert scale 1-5).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve participants (median 54 (45-58) years old; 92% female) were included in two focus groups. All domains of the questionnaire had medians of 3 or above. Seven major themes and six subthemes emerged. Participants considered the questionnaire as very clear and simple and with adequate questions. Patients pointed as extremely important being treated with dignity and respect and considered the awareness of the multidisciplinary team and the presentation of support programs and organizations as areas for improvement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Portuguese version of the CQRA-PREM is acceptable and its content is valid in the perspective of patients with RA to assess the quality of care provided by the healthcare services.</p>","PeriodicalId":29669,"journal":{"name":"ARP Rheumatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ARP Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

TBackground: The evaluation of perceptions of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has a positive influence in their health outcomes and overall experience of care. The Commissioning for Quality in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patient-Reported Experience Measure (CQRA-PREM) was developed to provide the perceptions and the feedback of the patients with RA to the health professionals team. This PREM is already validated and in use in the United Kingdom (UK) and Netherlands. In Portugal, there is no validated PREM to evaluate the experience of patients with RA.

Objective: To translate, cultural adapt and validate the content of the CQRA-PREM for the Portuguese population.

Methods: A qualitative study using focus groups was conducted to evaluate CQRA-PREM content validity. The CQRA-PREM was first translated and cultural adapted to Portuguese by two researchers, and after back translation, a panel of experts agreed on the preliminary Portuguese version of CQRA-PREM. Patients with RA were recruited from a rheumatology center at a tertiary university hospital center to participate in focus group meetings. Before the focus group they filled in the preliminary version of CQRA-PREM, with its 7 domains and 24 items (Likert scale 1-5).

Results: Twelve participants (median 54 (45-58) years old; 92% female) were included in two focus groups. All domains of the questionnaire had medians of 3 or above. Seven major themes and six subthemes emerged. Participants considered the questionnaire as very clear and simple and with adequate questions. Patients pointed as extremely important being treated with dignity and respect and considered the awareness of the multidisciplinary team and the presentation of support programs and organizations as areas for improvement.

Conclusion: The Portuguese version of the CQRA-PREM is acceptable and its content is valid in the perspective of patients with RA to assess the quality of care provided by the healthcare services.

葡萄牙类风湿性关节炎患者报告经验测量(CQRA-PREM)的内容有效性。
背景:评估类风湿性关节炎(RA)患者的认知对他们的健康结果和整体护理体验有积极影响。制定了《类风湿性关节炎患者报告经验测量质量调试》(CQRA-PREM),旨在向卫生专业团队提供RA患者的感知和反馈。该PREM已在英国和荷兰得到验证和使用。在葡萄牙,没有经过验证的PREM来评估RA患者的经验。目的:为葡萄牙人翻译、文化改编和验证CQRA-PEM的内容。方法:采用焦点小组进行定性研究,评价CQRA-PREM内容的有效性。两名研究人员首先将CQRA-PREM翻译成葡萄牙语,并对其进行文化改编,经过后译,一个专家小组就CQRA-Prum的葡萄牙语初步版本达成一致。RA患者是从三级大学医院中心的风湿病中心招募来参加焦点小组会议的。在焦点小组之前,他们填写了CQRA-PEM的初步版本,包括7个领域和24个项目(Likert量表1-5)。结果:12名参与者(中位54岁(45-58岁);92%的女性)被纳入两个焦点组。问卷的所有领域均具有3或以上的中位数。出现了七大主题和六个子主题。与会者认为调查表非常清楚和简单,并提出了充分的问题。患者指出,获得尊严和尊重的治疗极其重要,并认为多学科团队的意识以及支持计划和组织的介绍是需要改进的领域。结论:葡萄牙版的CQRA-PEM是可接受的,其内容从RA患者的角度来看是有效的,可以评估医疗服务提供的护理质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信