The External Jugular Vein Cut-Down Method for Chemoport Insertion from a Tertiary Cancer Treatment Center in Central India: A Prospective Study.

Abstract

Introduction: In the realm of oncology, the development of TIVAD (chemoport) has been a blessing for cancer patients, freeing them from having to undergo numerous recurrent venepunctures throughout their treatment. The External Jugular Vein cut-down has been the standard procedure for administering chemotherapy to cancer patients at our institution. Here, we discuss our experience with the External Jugular Vein cut-down Chemoport Insertion Technique and the outcomes it produced.

Materials and methods: We performed a prospective observational study and included all patients who underwent the open External Jugular Vein cut-down technique of Chemoport Insertion from January 2019 to January 2022 in the Department of Surgical Oncology at our hospital.

Results: Out of 136 patients, 3 (2.2%) had failed external jugular vein (EJV) cannulation, and alternative access (Internal Jugular Vein) was chosen for cannulation. The most common indication for chemoport insertion in our study was carcinoma of the breast, around 72.93% (97/133), and hence the majority of patients were females, about 84.21% (112/133). Only 18.04% (24/133) were male patients. The age distribution ranged from 2 years to 84 years. Out of 133 patients, complications were observed in 14 patients (10.52%). Around 6 patients (4.5%) had problems with catheter blockage after one cycle of chemotherapy. 4 patients (3%) had port infections at the chamber region (pectoral region). 3 patients (2.2%) had catheter tip displacement into the brachiocephalic vein. 1 patient (0.75%) had extravasation of chemotherapy.

Conclusion: In conclusion, our study demonstrates that the External Jugular Vein cut-down technique offers several advantages in the realm of oncology, as it is a safe, efficient, and straightforward technique for chemoport insertion. With its minimal learning curve and simplicity, this technique represents a favorable initial option for successfully implanting chemoports in cancer patients. Further research and comparative studies are needed to validate and further explore the benefits of this technique in diverse patient populations and healthcare settings.