Enabling primary healthcare service development with patient participation: a qualitative study of the internal facilitator role in Norway.

Ann Britt Sandvin Olsson, Una Stenberg, Mette Haaland-Øverby, Tor Slettebø, Anita Strøm
{"title":"Enabling primary healthcare service development with patient participation: a qualitative study of the internal facilitator role in Norway.","authors":"Ann Britt Sandvin Olsson,&nbsp;Una Stenberg,&nbsp;Mette Haaland-Øverby,&nbsp;Tor Slettebø,&nbsp;Anita Strøm","doi":"10.1017/S1463423623000488","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore how primary healthcare professionals (HCPs) tasked with facilitating primary healthcare service development with patient participation perceived their role.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Patient participation in health service development is a recognized means of ensuring that health services fit the public's needs. However, HCPs are often uncertain about how to involve patient representatives (PRs), and patient participation is poorly implemented. Inspired by the Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services framework, we address the innovation (patient participation), its recipients (PRs, HCPs, supervisors, and senior managers), and its context (primary healthcare at a local and organizational level).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted semi-structured individual interviews with six HCPs working as internal facilitators in primary healthcare in four Norwegian municipalities. The data were analyzed by applying Braun and Clarke's reflexive thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The themes show that to develop primary healthcare services with patient participation, facilitators must establish a network of PRs with relevant skills, promote involvement within their organization, engage HCPs favorable toward patient participation, and demonstrate to supervisors and senior managers its usefulness to win their support. Implementing patient participation must be a shared, collective responsibility of facilitators, supervisors, and senior management. However, supervisors and senior management appear not to fully understand the potential of involvement or how to support the facilitators. The facilitator role requires continuous and systematic work on multiple organizational levels to enable the development of health services with patient participation. It entails maintaining a network of persons with experiential knowledge, engaging HCPs, and having senior management's understanding and support.</p>","PeriodicalId":74493,"journal":{"name":"Primary health care research & development","volume":"24 ","pages":"e57"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10539736/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Primary health care research & development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1463423623000488","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To explore how primary healthcare professionals (HCPs) tasked with facilitating primary healthcare service development with patient participation perceived their role.

Introduction: Patient participation in health service development is a recognized means of ensuring that health services fit the public's needs. However, HCPs are often uncertain about how to involve patient representatives (PRs), and patient participation is poorly implemented. Inspired by the Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services framework, we address the innovation (patient participation), its recipients (PRs, HCPs, supervisors, and senior managers), and its context (primary healthcare at a local and organizational level).

Methods: We conducted semi-structured individual interviews with six HCPs working as internal facilitators in primary healthcare in four Norwegian municipalities. The data were analyzed by applying Braun and Clarke's reflexive thematic analysis.

Findings: The themes show that to develop primary healthcare services with patient participation, facilitators must establish a network of PRs with relevant skills, promote involvement within their organization, engage HCPs favorable toward patient participation, and demonstrate to supervisors and senior managers its usefulness to win their support. Implementing patient participation must be a shared, collective responsibility of facilitators, supervisors, and senior management. However, supervisors and senior management appear not to fully understand the potential of involvement or how to support the facilitators. The facilitator role requires continuous and systematic work on multiple organizational levels to enable the development of health services with patient participation. It entails maintaining a network of persons with experiential knowledge, engaging HCPs, and having senior management's understanding and support.

Abstract Image

在患者参与的情况下促进初级保健服务的发展:对挪威内部促进者作用的定性研究。
目的:探讨负责通过患者参与促进初级保健服务发展的初级保健专业人员(HCP)如何感知他们的角色。引言:患者参与卫生服务发展是确保卫生服务满足公众需求的公认手段。然而,HCP通常不确定如何让患者代表(PR)参与,并且患者参与实施不力。受健康服务研究实施促进行动框架的启发,我们解决了创新(患者参与)及其接受者(PR、HCP、主管和高级管理人员),及其背景(地方和组织层面的初级保健)。方法:我们对挪威四个城市的六名初级保健内部辅导员进行了半结构化的个人访谈。运用Braun和Clarke的反身主题分析法对数据进行分析。研究结果:主题表明,要发展有患者参与的初级医疗保健服务,促进者必须建立一个具有相关技能的公关网络,促进其组织内的参与,让有利于患者参与的HCP参与,并向主管和高级管理人员证明其有助于赢得他们的支持。实施患者参与必须是主持人、主管和高级管理层的共同集体责任。然而,主管和高级管理人员似乎并不完全了解参与的潜力,也不了解如何支持主持人。促进者的角色需要在多个组织层面上进行持续和系统的工作,以便在患者参与的情况下发展卫生服务。它需要维护一个具有经验知识的人员网络,吸引HCP,并得到高级管理层的理解和支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信