Response surface analyses of antihypertensive effects of angiotensin receptor blockers and amlodipine or hydrochlorothiazide combination therapy in patients with essential hypertension.

IF 1.1 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Translational and Clinical Pharmacology Pub Date : 2023-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-19 DOI:10.12793/tcp.2023.31.e15
Minhee Cho, Eunsook Oh, Byungjin Ahn, MoonTae Yoon
{"title":"Response surface analyses of antihypertensive effects of angiotensin receptor blockers and amlodipine or hydrochlorothiazide combination therapy in patients with essential hypertension.","authors":"Minhee Cho,&nbsp;Eunsook Oh,&nbsp;Byungjin Ahn,&nbsp;MoonTae Yoon","doi":"10.12793/tcp.2023.31.e15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While previous studies have examined the dose-response characteristics of certain antihypertensive drugs alone or in combination, response surface analysis for combination therapies involving angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) and either amlodipine (AML) or hydrochlorothiazide (HCT) has not been explored, particularly in the context of low-dose combinations. The objectives of present study were to generate useful dose-response information for the combination of ARB/AML or ARB/HCT and to predict the blood pressure lowering effects of combination therapies compared to monotherapies. We reviewed the New Drug Application data of combination drugs of ARB/AML and ARB/HCT. Data on systolic blood pressure (SBP), from studies conducted using a factorial dose-response design over a period of 8-12 weeks, were used. The placebo-subtracted SBP change was used for analysis. Response surface analyses of the collected data were conducted using a polynomial regression model. For ARB/AML combination, the quadratic polynomial regression model containing two linear terms, two quadratic terms, and one interaction term was best fitted to the naïve pooled data. Meanwhile, for ARB/HCT combination, the best-fitted model was a quadratic model that included two linear terms and two quadratic terms. The 1/2-dose combination of these medications, compared to each monotherapy, resulted in predicted SBP reductions that were 8-30% greater. The ratio of the estimated antihypertensive effects of the combination to the expected additive effects of each component ranged from 82% to 100% of the expected effect. These results can provide a rationale for developing lower-dose combinations of ARB/AML or ARB/HCT and assist in designing clinical trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":23288,"journal":{"name":"Translational and Clinical Pharmacology","volume":"31 3","pages":"154-166"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e5/9d/tcp-31-154.PMC10551747.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational and Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12793/tcp.2023.31.e15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While previous studies have examined the dose-response characteristics of certain antihypertensive drugs alone or in combination, response surface analysis for combination therapies involving angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) and either amlodipine (AML) or hydrochlorothiazide (HCT) has not been explored, particularly in the context of low-dose combinations. The objectives of present study were to generate useful dose-response information for the combination of ARB/AML or ARB/HCT and to predict the blood pressure lowering effects of combination therapies compared to monotherapies. We reviewed the New Drug Application data of combination drugs of ARB/AML and ARB/HCT. Data on systolic blood pressure (SBP), from studies conducted using a factorial dose-response design over a period of 8-12 weeks, were used. The placebo-subtracted SBP change was used for analysis. Response surface analyses of the collected data were conducted using a polynomial regression model. For ARB/AML combination, the quadratic polynomial regression model containing two linear terms, two quadratic terms, and one interaction term was best fitted to the naïve pooled data. Meanwhile, for ARB/HCT combination, the best-fitted model was a quadratic model that included two linear terms and two quadratic terms. The 1/2-dose combination of these medications, compared to each monotherapy, resulted in predicted SBP reductions that were 8-30% greater. The ratio of the estimated antihypertensive effects of the combination to the expected additive effects of each component ranged from 82% to 100% of the expected effect. These results can provide a rationale for developing lower-dose combinations of ARB/AML or ARB/HCT and assist in designing clinical trials.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

血管紧张素受体阻滞剂与氨氯地平或氢氯噻嗪联合治疗原发性高血压患者降压作用的响应面分析。
虽然先前的研究已经检查了某些降压药物单独或联合使用的剂量-反应特性,但尚未对涉及血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARBs)和氨氯地平(AML)或氢氯噻嗪(HCT)的联合治疗的反应面分析进行探索,特别是在低剂量联合使用的情况下。本研究的目的是为ARB/AML或ARB/HCT的组合产生有用的剂量反应信息,并预测与单一疗法相比联合疗法的降压效果。我们回顾了ARB/AML和ARB/HCT联合用药的新药申请数据。使用了8-12周内使用因子剂量反应设计进行的研究的收缩压(SBP)数据。使用安慰剂减去SBP的变化进行分析。使用多项式回归模型对收集的数据进行响应面分析。对于ARB/AML组合,包含两个线性项、两个二次项和一个相互作用项的二次多项式回归模型最适合天真的汇总数据。同时,对于ARB/HCT组合,最佳拟合模型是包含两个线性项和两个二次项的二次模型。与每种单一疗法相比,这些药物的1/2剂量组合导致SBP的预测降低高出8-30%。联合用药的估计降压效果与各成分的预期相加效果之比为预期效果的82%至100%。这些结果可以为开发ARB/AML或ARB/HCT的低剂量组合提供基本原理,并有助于设计临床试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Translational and Clinical Pharmacology
Translational and Clinical Pharmacology Medicine-Pharmacology (medical)
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
11.10%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: Translational and Clinical Pharmacology (Transl Clin Pharmacol, TCP) is the official journal of the Korean Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics (KSCPT). TCP is an interdisciplinary journal devoted to the dissemination of knowledge relating to all aspects of translational and clinical pharmacology. The categories for publication include pharmacokinetics (PK) and drug disposition, drug metabolism, pharmacodynamics (PD), clinical trials and design issues, pharmacogenomics and pharmacogenetics, pharmacometrics, pharmacoepidemiology, pharmacovigilence, and human pharmacology. Studies involving animal models, pharmacological characterization, and clinical trials are appropriate for consideration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信