Atrial Fibrillation and Reperfusion Therapy in Acute Ischaemic Stroke Patients: Prevalence and Outcomes-A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 3.2 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Jay Patel, Sonu M M Bhaskar
{"title":"Atrial Fibrillation and Reperfusion Therapy in Acute Ischaemic Stroke Patients: Prevalence and Outcomes-A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Jay Patel,&nbsp;Sonu M M Bhaskar","doi":"10.3390/neurolint15030065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Atrial fibrillation (AF) significantly contributes to acute ischaemic stroke (AIS), yet its precise influence on clinical outcomes post-intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and post-endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) has remained elusive. Furthermore, the overall prevalence of AF in AIS patients undergoing reperfusion therapy has not been clearly determined. Employing random-effects meta-analyses, this research aimed to estimate the pooled prevalence of AF among AIS patients undergoing reperfusion therapy, while also examining the association between AF and clinical outcomes such as functional outcomes, symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage (sICH) and mortality. Studies comparing AF and non-AF patient groups undergoing reperfusion therapy were identified and included following an extensive database search. Forty-nine studies (n = 66,887) were included. Among IVT patients, the prevalence of AF was 31% (Effect Size [ES] 0.31 [95%CI 0.28-0.35], <i>p</i> < 0.01), while in EVT patients, it reached 42% (ES 0.42 [95%CI 0.38-0.46], <i>p</i> < 0.01), and in bridging therapy (BT) patients, it stood at 36% (ES 0.36 [95%CI 0.28-0.43], <i>p</i> < 0.01). AF was associated with significantly lower odds of favourable 90-day functional outcomes post IVT (Odds Ratio [OR] 0.512 [95%CI 0.376-0.696], <i>p</i> < 0.001), but not post EVT (OR 0.826 [95%CI 0.651-1.049], <i>p</i> = 0.117). Our comprehensive meta-analysis highlights the varying prevalence of AF among different reperfusion therapies and its differential impact on patient outcomes. The highest pooled prevalence of AF was observed in EVT patients, followed by BT and IVT patients. Interestingly, our analysis revealed that AF was significantly associated with poorer clinical outcomes following IVT. Such an association was not observed following EVT.</p>","PeriodicalId":19130,"journal":{"name":"Neurology International","volume":"15 3","pages":"1014-1043"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10537209/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/neurolint15030065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Atrial fibrillation (AF) significantly contributes to acute ischaemic stroke (AIS), yet its precise influence on clinical outcomes post-intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and post-endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) has remained elusive. Furthermore, the overall prevalence of AF in AIS patients undergoing reperfusion therapy has not been clearly determined. Employing random-effects meta-analyses, this research aimed to estimate the pooled prevalence of AF among AIS patients undergoing reperfusion therapy, while also examining the association between AF and clinical outcomes such as functional outcomes, symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage (sICH) and mortality. Studies comparing AF and non-AF patient groups undergoing reperfusion therapy were identified and included following an extensive database search. Forty-nine studies (n = 66,887) were included. Among IVT patients, the prevalence of AF was 31% (Effect Size [ES] 0.31 [95%CI 0.28-0.35], p < 0.01), while in EVT patients, it reached 42% (ES 0.42 [95%CI 0.38-0.46], p < 0.01), and in bridging therapy (BT) patients, it stood at 36% (ES 0.36 [95%CI 0.28-0.43], p < 0.01). AF was associated with significantly lower odds of favourable 90-day functional outcomes post IVT (Odds Ratio [OR] 0.512 [95%CI 0.376-0.696], p < 0.001), but not post EVT (OR 0.826 [95%CI 0.651-1.049], p = 0.117). Our comprehensive meta-analysis highlights the varying prevalence of AF among different reperfusion therapies and its differential impact on patient outcomes. The highest pooled prevalence of AF was observed in EVT patients, followed by BT and IVT patients. Interestingly, our analysis revealed that AF was significantly associated with poorer clinical outcomes following IVT. Such an association was not observed following EVT.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

急性缺血性卒中患者的心房颤动和再灌注治疗:患病率和结果——一项综合系统综述和荟萃分析。
心房颤动(AF)是急性缺血性卒中(AIS)的重要原因,但其对静脉溶栓(IVT)和血管内血栓切除术(EVT)后临床结果的确切影响仍然难以捉摸。此外,接受再灌注治疗的AIS患者中AF的总体患病率尚未明确确定。本研究采用随机效应荟萃分析,旨在估计接受再灌注治疗的AIS患者中AF的合并患病率,同时检查AF与临床结果(如功能结果、症状性脑出血(sICH)和死亡率)之间的关系。在广泛的数据库搜索后,确定并纳入了比较接受再灌注治疗的AF和非AF患者组的研究。纳入了49项研究(n=66887)。在IVT患者中,房颤的患病率为31%(效应大小[ES]0.31[95%CI 0.28-0.35],p<0.01),而在EVT患者中达到42%(ES 0.42[95%CI 0.38-0.46],p<0.01),在桥接治疗(BT)患者中,为36%(ES 0.36[95%CI 0.28-0.43],p<0.01)。房颤与IVT后90天功能结果良好的几率显著降低相关(比值比[OR]0.512[95%CI 0.376-0.696],p<0.001),而不是EVT后(OR 0.826[95%CI 0.651-1.049],p=0.117)。我们的综合荟萃分析强调了不同再灌注疗法中AF的不同患病率及其对患者预后的不同影响。房颤合并患病率最高的是EVT患者,其次是BT和IVT患者。有趣的是,我们的分析显示,房颤与IVT后较差的临床结果显著相关。EVT后未观察到这种关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurology International
Neurology International CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
69
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信