Myths and facts about functional neurological disorders: a cross-sectional study of knowledge and awareness among medical students and healthcare professionals in Iraq.

IF 2.1 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
BMJ Neurology Open Pub Date : 2023-09-30 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjno-2023-000470
Essam M Al-Sibahee, Ahmed Hashim, Sajjad Al-Badri, Nabeel Al-Fatlawi
{"title":"Myths and facts about functional neurological disorders: a cross-sectional study of knowledge and awareness among medical students and healthcare professionals in Iraq.","authors":"Essam M Al-Sibahee,&nbsp;Ahmed Hashim,&nbsp;Sajjad Al-Badri,&nbsp;Nabeel Al-Fatlawi","doi":"10.1136/bmjno-2023-000470","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Functional neurological disorder (FND) is a complex condition with neurological symptoms but no clear structural or biochemical explanation. Myths and misconceptions about FND can lead to misdiagnosis and inappropriate treatment. This study aimed to assess knowledge and common myths about FND among medical students and practitioners.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were collected from 324 participants using a structured questionnaire. The questionnaire included demographics, general information about FND and myths about FND. Data were analysed using non-parametric tests and Spearman's r for correlations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The majority of participants were clinical-years medical students (65.1%) and female (59.6%). Overall, knowledge about FND was limited, with a mean score of 42.3% of correct answers. Common myths included the belief that FND is a psychological disorder and that patients feign symptoms. Knowledge scores differed significantly among different grades/experience levels, with postgraduate practitioners having the highest scores. There was a positive correlation between knowledge scores and confidence in managing FND.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights the prevalence of myths and misconceptions about FND among medical students and practitioners, emphasising the need for accurate education to improve diagnosis and management. Healthcare professionals should take a biopsychosocial approach to FND, considering the complex interplay between biological, psychological and social factors. Efforts to increase awareness and reduce stigma associated with FND are crucial for promoting better care. Targeted educational interventions may be beneficial to improve the understanding and management of FND among medical professionals.</p>","PeriodicalId":52754,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Neurology Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/24/80/bmjno-2023-000470.PMC10546105.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Neurology Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjno-2023-000470","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Functional neurological disorder (FND) is a complex condition with neurological symptoms but no clear structural or biochemical explanation. Myths and misconceptions about FND can lead to misdiagnosis and inappropriate treatment. This study aimed to assess knowledge and common myths about FND among medical students and practitioners.

Methods: Data were collected from 324 participants using a structured questionnaire. The questionnaire included demographics, general information about FND and myths about FND. Data were analysed using non-parametric tests and Spearman's r for correlations.

Results: The majority of participants were clinical-years medical students (65.1%) and female (59.6%). Overall, knowledge about FND was limited, with a mean score of 42.3% of correct answers. Common myths included the belief that FND is a psychological disorder and that patients feign symptoms. Knowledge scores differed significantly among different grades/experience levels, with postgraduate practitioners having the highest scores. There was a positive correlation between knowledge scores and confidence in managing FND.

Conclusion: This study highlights the prevalence of myths and misconceptions about FND among medical students and practitioners, emphasising the need for accurate education to improve diagnosis and management. Healthcare professionals should take a biopsychosocial approach to FND, considering the complex interplay between biological, psychological and social factors. Efforts to increase awareness and reduce stigma associated with FND are crucial for promoting better care. Targeted educational interventions may be beneficial to improve the understanding and management of FND among medical professionals.

关于功能性神经疾病的神话和事实:伊拉克医学生和医疗保健专业人员知识和意识的横断面研究。
背景:功能性神经障碍(FND)是一种复杂的疾病,有神经系统症状,但没有明确的结构或生化解释。关于FND的神话和误解可能导致误诊和治疗不当。本研究旨在评估医学生和从业者对FND的了解和常见误解。方法:使用结构化问卷从324名参与者中收集数据。调查问卷包括人口统计、关于FND的一般信息和关于FND神话。使用非参数检验和Spearman r相关性分析数据。结果:大多数参与者是临床医学专业的学生(65.1%)和女性(59.6%)。总体而言,对FND的了解有限,平均正确答案得分为42.3%。常见的误解包括认为FND是一种心理障碍,患者会假装症状。不同年级/经验水平的知识得分差异显著,研究生从业者得分最高。知识得分与管理FND的信心呈正相关。结论:本研究强调了医学生和从业者对FND的误解和误解的普遍性,强调了准确教育以改善诊断和管理的必要性。医疗保健专业人员应对FND采取生物-心理-社会方法,考虑到生物、心理和社会因素之间的复杂相互作用。努力提高认识和减少与FND相关的耻辱感对于促进更好的护理至关重要。有针对性的教育干预可能有助于提高医学专业人员对FND的理解和管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Neurology Open
BMJ Neurology Open Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
46
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信