Critical care echocardiography: barriers, competencies and solutions. A survey of over 600 participants.

IF 1.6 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Mateusz Zawadka, Adrian Wong, Anna Janiszewska, Filippo Sanfilippo, Luigi La Via, Piotr Sobieraj, Igor Abramovich, Paweł Andruszkiewicz, Ib Jammer
{"title":"Critical care echocardiography: barriers, competencies and solutions. A survey of over 600 participants.","authors":"Mateusz Zawadka,&nbsp;Adrian Wong,&nbsp;Anna Janiszewska,&nbsp;Filippo Sanfilippo,&nbsp;Luigi La Via,&nbsp;Piotr Sobieraj,&nbsp;Igor Abramovich,&nbsp;Paweł Andruszkiewicz,&nbsp;Ib Jammer","doi":"10.5114/ait.2023.130294","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Critical care echocardiography (CCE) is at the core of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS), and although a list of the necessary competencies has been created, most European countries do not have established training programmes to allow intensivists to gain such competencies. To address barriers to the implementation of CCE, we conducted an online European survey, and analysed the current barriers to this with the aim of providing novel, modern solutions to them including environmental considerations.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A 23-item survey was distributed via email with support from the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine, national societies, and social media. Questions focused on bedside CCE prevalence, competencies, and barriers to its implementation. An additional questionnaire was sent to recognised experts in the field of CCE.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 644 responses were recorded. Most respondents were anaesthesia and intensive care physicians [79% ( n = 468)], and younger, with 56% in their first five years after specialization ( n = 358). Most respondents [92% ( n = 594)] had access to an ultrasound machine with a cardiac probe, and 97% ( n = 623) reported being able to acquire basic CCE windows. The most common barriers identified by respondents to the implementation of CCE in practice were a lack of sufficient experience/skill [64% ( n = 343)], absence of formal qualifications [46% ( n = 246)] and lack of a mentor [45% ( n = 243)]. Twenty-eight experts responded and identified a lack of allocated time for teaching as a main barrier [60% ( n = 17)].</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found that bedside CCE is perceived as a crucial skill for intensive care medicine, especially by younger physicians; however, there remain several obstacles to training and implementation. The most important impediments reported by respondents were inadequate training, absence of formal qualifications and difficulties in finding a suitable mentor.</p>","PeriodicalId":7750,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesiology intensive therapy","volume":"55 3","pages":"158-162"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/2a/d7/AIT-55-51197.PMC10496096.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesiology intensive therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/ait.2023.130294","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: Critical care echocardiography (CCE) is at the core of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS), and although a list of the necessary competencies has been created, most European countries do not have established training programmes to allow intensivists to gain such competencies. To address barriers to the implementation of CCE, we conducted an online European survey, and analysed the current barriers to this with the aim of providing novel, modern solutions to them including environmental considerations.

Material and methods: A 23-item survey was distributed via email with support from the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine, national societies, and social media. Questions focused on bedside CCE prevalence, competencies, and barriers to its implementation. An additional questionnaire was sent to recognised experts in the field of CCE.

Results: A total of 644 responses were recorded. Most respondents were anaesthesia and intensive care physicians [79% ( n = 468)], and younger, with 56% in their first five years after specialization ( n = 358). Most respondents [92% ( n = 594)] had access to an ultrasound machine with a cardiac probe, and 97% ( n = 623) reported being able to acquire basic CCE windows. The most common barriers identified by respondents to the implementation of CCE in practice were a lack of sufficient experience/skill [64% ( n = 343)], absence of formal qualifications [46% ( n = 246)] and lack of a mentor [45% ( n = 243)]. Twenty-eight experts responded and identified a lack of allocated time for teaching as a main barrier [60% ( n = 17)].

Conclusions: We found that bedside CCE is perceived as a crucial skill for intensive care medicine, especially by younger physicians; however, there remain several obstacles to training and implementation. The most important impediments reported by respondents were inadequate training, absence of formal qualifications and difficulties in finding a suitable mentor.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

重症监护超声心动图:障碍、能力和解决方案。一项针对600多名参与者的调查。
引言:重症监护超声心动图(CCE)是护理点超声(POCUS)的核心,尽管已经制定了必要的能力清单,但大多数欧洲国家还没有制定培训计划,让重症监护医生获得这些能力。为了解决实施CCE的障碍,我们进行了一项欧洲在线调查,并分析了目前的障碍,目的是为这些障碍提供新颖、现代的解决方案,包括环境因素。材料和方法:在欧洲重症监护医学学会、国家学会和社交媒体的支持下,通过电子邮件分发了一份23项调查。问题集中在床边CCE的流行率、能力和实施障碍方面。向CCE领域的知名专家发送了一份额外的问卷。结果:共记录了644份回复。大多数受访者是麻醉和重症监护医生[79%(n=468)],以及更年轻的医生,其中56%在专业化后的前五年(n=358)。大多数受访者[92%(n=594)]可以使用带有心脏探头的超声波机器,97%(n=623)报告能够获得基本的CCE窗口。受访者发现,在实践中实施CCE最常见的障碍是缺乏足够的经验/技能[64%(n=343)]、缺乏正式资格[46%(n=246)]和缺乏导师[45%(n=243)]。28位专家做出了回应,认为缺乏分配的教学时间是主要障碍[60%(n=17)]。结论:我们发现,床边CCE被认为是重症监护医学的一项关键技能,尤其是年轻医生;然而,在培训和实施方面仍然存在一些障碍。受访者报告的最重要障碍是培训不足、缺乏正式资格以及难以找到合适的导师。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
48
审稿时长
25 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信