Associations and Predictive Pathways Between Shared Governance, Autonomy, Magnet Status, Nurse-Sensitive Indicators, and Nurse Satisfaction: A Multisite Study.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING
Journal of nursing care quality Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-08 DOI:10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000739
Juli McGinnis, Vivien Dee, June Rondinelli, Hong Li
{"title":"Associations and Predictive Pathways Between Shared Governance, Autonomy, Magnet Status, Nurse-Sensitive Indicators, and Nurse Satisfaction: A Multisite Study.","authors":"Juli McGinnis, Vivien Dee, June Rondinelli, Hong Li","doi":"10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000739","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evidence is limited to the effects of shared governance (SG) and autonomy on nurse-sensitive indicators (NSIs).</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To explore the effects of SG, autonomy, and Magnet status on nurse and patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey study was conducted using a convenience sample of 404 nurses from 4 hospitals. Descriptive analyses of variance (ANOVAs), and path analysis were conducted to identify hypothesized associations and predictive pathways among study variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nurse managers reported higher perceptions of SG, autonomy, and satisfaction than staff nurses. SG and autonomy were significant predictors of patient falls and hospital-acquired pressure injuries. Nurses' autonomy, SG, and Magnet accreditation were significant predictors of nurse satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Leadership support of SG and autonomous practice are key strategies to improve nurse satisfaction and NSI outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":16931,"journal":{"name":"Journal of nursing care quality","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of nursing care quality","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000739","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Evidence is limited to the effects of shared governance (SG) and autonomy on nurse-sensitive indicators (NSIs).

Purpose: To explore the effects of SG, autonomy, and Magnet status on nurse and patient outcomes.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey study was conducted using a convenience sample of 404 nurses from 4 hospitals. Descriptive analyses of variance (ANOVAs), and path analysis were conducted to identify hypothesized associations and predictive pathways among study variables.

Results: Nurse managers reported higher perceptions of SG, autonomy, and satisfaction than staff nurses. SG and autonomy were significant predictors of patient falls and hospital-acquired pressure injuries. Nurses' autonomy, SG, and Magnet accreditation were significant predictors of nurse satisfaction.

Conclusions: Leadership support of SG and autonomous practice are key strategies to improve nurse satisfaction and NSI outcomes.

共享治理、自主性、磁铁地位、护士敏感指标和护士满意度之间的关联和预测路径:一项多站点研究。
背景:证据仅限于共享治理(SG)和自主性对护士敏感指标(NSI)的影响。目的:探讨SG、自主性和磁铁状态对护士和患者结局的影响。方法:采用横断面调查方法,抽取4所医院的404名护士作为调查对象。方差描述分析(ANOVA)和路径分析用于确定研究变量之间的假设关联和预测路径。结果:护士管理者对SG、自主性和满意度的认知高于护士。SG和自主性是患者跌倒和医院获得性压力损伤的重要预测因素。护士的自主权、SG和Magnet认证是护士满意度的重要预测因素。结论:SG的领导支持和自主实践是提高护士满意度和NSI结果的关键策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
90
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Nursing Care Quality (JNCQ) is a peer-reviewed journal that provides practicing nurses as well as nurses who have leadership roles in nursing care quality programs with useful information regarding the application of quality principles and concepts in the practice setting. The journal offers a forum for the scholarly discussion of “real world” implementation of quality activities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信