Informing wobble-board training and assessment through an investigation of the effect of biological-sex, anthropometrics, footwear and dual-tasking in young adults.

IF 1.4 4区医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS

Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3233/BMR-230020

Madawi ALJawaee, Jonathan M Williams, Michael D Jones

{"title":"Informing wobble-board training and assessment through an investigation of the effect of biological-sex, anthropometrics, footwear and dual-tasking in young adults.","authors":"Madawi ALJawaee, Jonathan M Williams, Michael D Jones","doi":"10.3233/BMR-230020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Despite wobble board use being common in physiotherapy the effect of certain factors, essential to clinical reasoning, have not been investigated.Objective: To determine the effect of biological sex, anthropometrics, footwear and dual tasking (DT) on wobble board balance performance.Methods: Eighty-six healthy participants (44 females) had their wobble board performance measured during double-leg-stance (DLS) with eyes open (DLSEO), closed (DLSEC) and single-leg-stance (SLS) tasks, with and without footwear and a DT added. Anthropometrics were also measured.Results: Females outperformed males during most tasks, with some large effect sizes (ES). Performance was moderately related to weight and shoulder, waist and hip circumference. Overall, there were no differences between footwear and no footwear, except for males during SLS. DT made little difference, except during DLSEO and SLS, where single task was better than DT, though only females had a large ES.Conclusion: During wobble board tasks, biological sex differences were observed and a modest correlation between anthropometrics and performance noted. DT and footwear had minimal effect.","PeriodicalId":15129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/BMR-230020","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite wobble board use being common in physiotherapy the effect of certain factors, essential to clinical reasoning, have not been investigated.

Objective: To determine the effect of biological sex, anthropometrics, footwear and dual tasking (DT) on wobble board balance performance.

Methods: Eighty-six healthy participants (44 females) had their wobble board performance measured during double-leg-stance (DLS) with eyes open (DLSEO), closed (DLSEC) and single-leg-stance (SLS) tasks, with and without footwear and a DT added. Anthropometrics were also measured.

Results: Females outperformed males during most tasks, with some large effect sizes (ES). Performance was moderately related to weight and shoulder, waist and hip circumference. Overall, there were no differences between footwear and no footwear, except for males during SLS. DT made little difference, except during DLSEO and SLS, where single task was better than DT, though only females had a large ES.

Conclusion: During wobble board tasks, biological sex differences were observed and a modest correlation between anthropometrics and performance noted. DT and footwear had minimal effect.

查看原文本刊更多论文

通过调查年轻人的生理性别、人体测量、鞋类和双重任务的影响，为摇摆板训练和评估提供信息。

背景：尽管摇摆板在理疗中很常见，但对临床推理至关重要的某些因素的影响尚未得到研究。目的：确定生理性别、人体测量、鞋类和双重任务（DT）对摇摆板平衡性能的影响。方法：86名健康参与者（44名女性）在睁开眼睛（DLSEO）、闭上眼睛（DLSEC）和单腿站姿（SLS）的双腿站姿（DLS）任务中测量了他们的摇摆板表现，并添加了DT。还测量了人体测量学。结果：雌性在大多数任务中表现优于雄性，具有一些较大的效果大小（ES）。表现与体重、肩、腰和臀围适度相关。总体而言，除SLS期间的男性外，有鞋和无鞋之间没有差异。DT的差异很小，除了在DLSEO和SLS期间，在这两个期间，单任务比DT好，尽管只有女性有很大的ES。结论：在摇摆板任务期间，观察到生物性别差异，并注意到人体测量和表现之间的适度相关性。DT和鞋类的影响很小。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学

CiteScore

2.70

自引率

0.00%

发文量

194

审稿时长

6 months

期刊介绍： The Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation is a journal whose main focus is to present relevant information about the interdisciplinary approach to musculoskeletal rehabilitation for clinicians who treat patients with back and musculoskeletal pain complaints. It will provide readers with both 1) a general fund of knowledge on the assessment and management of specific problems and 2) new information considered to be state-of-the-art in the field. The intended audience is multidisciplinary as well as multi-specialty. In each issue clinicians can find information which they can use in their patient setting the very next day.