Values Assessment Tools in Advanced Cancer: A Clinical Literature Review.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING
Sarah Durbin Weaver, Shreeya Singh, Leslie M Sharpe, Daniel S Reuland, Lorinda A Coombs
{"title":"Values Assessment Tools in Advanced Cancer: A Clinical Literature Review.","authors":"Sarah Durbin Weaver,&nbsp;Shreeya Singh,&nbsp;Leslie M Sharpe,&nbsp;Daniel S Reuland,&nbsp;Lorinda A Coombs","doi":"10.1188/23.CJON.525-531","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with advanced cancer may receive cancer treatment that does not reflect their values because they may not be completely aware of what is important to them regarding treatment-related decisions when they are diagnosed.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The purpose of this review was to determine whether existing values assessment tools can improve awareness of treatment-related decisional values in patients with advanced cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed®, CINAHL®, and PsycINFO® databases were searched for original English-language articles evaluating values assessment tools that could be used to assess patients with advanced cancer. The quality of the identified tools was evaluated using selected International Patient Decision Aid Standards instrument, version 3.0, criteria.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>All tools identified are appropriate for use in patients with advanced cancer. Two scored at least 80% on the selected International Patient Decision Aid Standards criteria. The Short Graphic Values History Tool was developed with patient and clinician input and may be particularly useful for low-literacy patient populations with advanced cancer. No values assessment tools have been identified specifically for use in patients with advanced cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":10350,"journal":{"name":"Clinical journal of oncology nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical journal of oncology nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1188/23.CJON.525-531","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients with advanced cancer may receive cancer treatment that does not reflect their values because they may not be completely aware of what is important to them regarding treatment-related decisions when they are diagnosed.

Objectives: The purpose of this review was to determine whether existing values assessment tools can improve awareness of treatment-related decisional values in patients with advanced cancer.

Methods: PubMed®, CINAHL®, and PsycINFO® databases were searched for original English-language articles evaluating values assessment tools that could be used to assess patients with advanced cancer. The quality of the identified tools was evaluated using selected International Patient Decision Aid Standards instrument, version 3.0, criteria.

Findings: All tools identified are appropriate for use in patients with advanced cancer. Two scored at least 80% on the selected International Patient Decision Aid Standards criteria. The Short Graphic Values History Tool was developed with patient and clinician input and may be particularly useful for low-literacy patient populations with advanced cancer. No values assessment tools have been identified specifically for use in patients with advanced cancer.

晚期癌症的价值评估工具:临床文献综述。
背景:晚期癌症患者可能会接受不反映其价值观的癌症治疗,因为他们在被诊断时可能没有完全意识到与治疗相关的决策对他们来说很重要。目的:本综述的目的是确定现有的价值评估工具是否可以提高晚期癌症患者对治疗相关决策价值的认识。方法:检索PubMed®、CINAHL®和PsycINFO®数据库中的原始英文文章,评估可用于评估晚期癌症患者的价值评估工具。使用选定的国际患者决策辅助标准仪器3.0版标准对确定的工具的质量进行评估。研究结果:所有确定的工具都适用于晚期癌症患者。其中两人在选定的国际患者决策援助标准中得分至少为80%。Short Graphic Values History Tool是根据患者和临床医生的意见开发的,可能对患有晚期癌症的低识字患者群体特别有用。尚未确定专门用于晚期癌症患者的价值评估工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
127
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Clinical Journal of Oncology Nursing (CJON) is an official publication of the Oncology Nursing Society (ONS) and is directed to the practicing nurse specializing in the care of patients with an actual or potential diagnosis of cancer. CJON is a vehicle to promote the mission of ONS, which is to advance excellence in oncology nursing and quality cancer care. The CJON mission is twofold: to provide practical information necessary to care for patients and their families across the cancer continuum and to develop publication skills in oncology nurses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信