[Influence of work engagement and self-efficacy of nurses on clinical practice ability in burn intensive care unit].

Q3 Medicine
H X Chen, W J Liu, B Liu, Z F Huang, Q P Zhang, X L Xiao, W Lai, S Y Zheng
{"title":"[Influence of work engagement and self-efficacy of nurses on clinical practice ability in burn intensive care unit].","authors":"H X Chen, W J Liu, B Liu, Z F Huang, Q P Zhang, X L Xiao, W Lai, S Y Zheng","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20220905-00379","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To analyze the influence of work engagement and self-efficacy of nurses on clinical practice ability in burn intensive care unit (BICU), and to explore its potential pathways of action. <b>Methods:</b> A cross-sectional survey was conducted. From May to October 2020, a total of 30 hospitals with BICU in China were selected by stratified sampling method. Among BICU nurses who met the inclusion criteria, their clinical practice ability, work engagement, and self-efficacy were evaluated by self-evaluation scale of oriented problem-solving behavior in nursing practice (OPSN), Utrecht work engagement scale (UWES), and general self-efficacy scale (GSES), respectively. The total scale scores of each index and the average item scores were recorded. The self-designed general data questionnaire was used to investigate the nurses' gender, age, marital status, education background, working years, professional title, and the economic region of the hospital that they belonged to. The total scale scores of the above-mentioned three evaluation indexes were compared after the classification of nurses according to general data, and the data were statistically analyzed with independent sample <i>t</i> test or one-way analysis of variance. Pearson correlation analysis was used to analyze the correlation between the total scale scores of the three evaluation indexes. Based on the total scale scores of the above-mentioned three evaluation indexes, a structural equation model was established, the mediation analysis of the relationship among the three evaluation indexes and the pathway analysis of the structural model were conducted, and the Bootstrap method was used to verify the pathways of action. <b>Results:</b> A total of 401 questionnaires were distributed, and 337 valid questionnaires were returned, with a valid return rate of 84.04%. The total scale scores of clinical practice ability, work engagement, and self-efficacy of 337 nurses were 98.2±11.7, 67.7±18.6, and 26.6±5.6, respectively, and the average item scores were 3.9±0.5, 4.5±1.2, and 2.7±0.6, respectively. Among the 337 nurses, the majority were female, aged 40 or below, married, and had a bachelor's degree with work experience of ≤10 years; both nurses with professional nurse title and nurses from the Southeast region accounted for about 50%. There were statistically significant differences in the total scale score of clinical practice ability among nurses with different ages, education backgrounds, working years, and professional titles (with <i>F</i> values of 3.26, 4.36, 3.12, and 2.80, respectively, <i>P</i><0.05). There was statistically significant difference in the total scale score of work engagement among nurses with different working years (<i>F</i>=4.50, <i>P</i><0.05). There were statistically significant differences in the total scale score of self-efficacy among nurses with different ages, working years, and professional titles (with <i>F</i> values of 4.91, 4.50, and 2.91, respectively, <i>P</i><0.05). The total scale score of nurses' work engagement was significantly positively correlated with the total scale score of clinical practice ability and the total scale score of self-efficacy (with <i>r</i> values of 0.30 and 0.51, respectively, <i>P</i><0.05). The total scale score of nurses' self-efficacy was significantly positively correlated with the total scale score of clinical practice ability (<i>r</i>=0.37, <i>P</i><0.05). The model had good adaptability, and the intermediary model was established. Nurses' work engagement had a significantly positive effect on both self-efficacy and clinical practice ability (with <i>β</i> values of 0.54 and 0.16, respectively, <i>P</i><0.05), and nurses' self-efficacy had a significantly positive effect on clinical practice ability (<i>β</i>=0.29, <i>P</i><0.05). Work engagement had a direct effect on self-efficacy and clinical practice ability, and self-efficacy had a direct effect on clinical practice ability and played a mediating role between work engagement and clinical practice ability. Bootstrap validation showed that self-efficacy played a significantly mediating role in the influence of work engagement on clinical practice ability (with effect size of 0.16, with 95% confidence interval of 0.08-0.24, <i>P</i><0.05), accounting for half of the total effect of work engagement on clinical practice ability (with effect size of 0.32). <b>Conclusions:</b> BICU nurses have an above-average level of clinical practice ability, a medium level of self-efficacy, and a high level of work engagement. Work engagement and self-efficacy are positively correlated with clinical practice ability. Work engagement can directly affect clinical practice ability or indirectly affect clinical practice ability through the mediating role of self-efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":24004,"journal":{"name":"Zhonghua shao shang za zhi = Zhonghua shaoshang zazhi = Chinese journal of burns","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zhonghua shao shang za zhi = Zhonghua shaoshang zazhi = Chinese journal of burns","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20220905-00379","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To analyze the influence of work engagement and self-efficacy of nurses on clinical practice ability in burn intensive care unit (BICU), and to explore its potential pathways of action. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted. From May to October 2020, a total of 30 hospitals with BICU in China were selected by stratified sampling method. Among BICU nurses who met the inclusion criteria, their clinical practice ability, work engagement, and self-efficacy were evaluated by self-evaluation scale of oriented problem-solving behavior in nursing practice (OPSN), Utrecht work engagement scale (UWES), and general self-efficacy scale (GSES), respectively. The total scale scores of each index and the average item scores were recorded. The self-designed general data questionnaire was used to investigate the nurses' gender, age, marital status, education background, working years, professional title, and the economic region of the hospital that they belonged to. The total scale scores of the above-mentioned three evaluation indexes were compared after the classification of nurses according to general data, and the data were statistically analyzed with independent sample t test or one-way analysis of variance. Pearson correlation analysis was used to analyze the correlation between the total scale scores of the three evaluation indexes. Based on the total scale scores of the above-mentioned three evaluation indexes, a structural equation model was established, the mediation analysis of the relationship among the three evaluation indexes and the pathway analysis of the structural model were conducted, and the Bootstrap method was used to verify the pathways of action. Results: A total of 401 questionnaires were distributed, and 337 valid questionnaires were returned, with a valid return rate of 84.04%. The total scale scores of clinical practice ability, work engagement, and self-efficacy of 337 nurses were 98.2±11.7, 67.7±18.6, and 26.6±5.6, respectively, and the average item scores were 3.9±0.5, 4.5±1.2, and 2.7±0.6, respectively. Among the 337 nurses, the majority were female, aged 40 or below, married, and had a bachelor's degree with work experience of ≤10 years; both nurses with professional nurse title and nurses from the Southeast region accounted for about 50%. There were statistically significant differences in the total scale score of clinical practice ability among nurses with different ages, education backgrounds, working years, and professional titles (with F values of 3.26, 4.36, 3.12, and 2.80, respectively, P<0.05). There was statistically significant difference in the total scale score of work engagement among nurses with different working years (F=4.50, P<0.05). There were statistically significant differences in the total scale score of self-efficacy among nurses with different ages, working years, and professional titles (with F values of 4.91, 4.50, and 2.91, respectively, P<0.05). The total scale score of nurses' work engagement was significantly positively correlated with the total scale score of clinical practice ability and the total scale score of self-efficacy (with r values of 0.30 and 0.51, respectively, P<0.05). The total scale score of nurses' self-efficacy was significantly positively correlated with the total scale score of clinical practice ability (r=0.37, P<0.05). The model had good adaptability, and the intermediary model was established. Nurses' work engagement had a significantly positive effect on both self-efficacy and clinical practice ability (with β values of 0.54 and 0.16, respectively, P<0.05), and nurses' self-efficacy had a significantly positive effect on clinical practice ability (β=0.29, P<0.05). Work engagement had a direct effect on self-efficacy and clinical practice ability, and self-efficacy had a direct effect on clinical practice ability and played a mediating role between work engagement and clinical practice ability. Bootstrap validation showed that self-efficacy played a significantly mediating role in the influence of work engagement on clinical practice ability (with effect size of 0.16, with 95% confidence interval of 0.08-0.24, P<0.05), accounting for half of the total effect of work engagement on clinical practice ability (with effect size of 0.32). Conclusions: BICU nurses have an above-average level of clinical practice ability, a medium level of self-efficacy, and a high level of work engagement. Work engagement and self-efficacy are positively correlated with clinical practice ability. Work engagement can directly affect clinical practice ability or indirectly affect clinical practice ability through the mediating role of self-efficacy.

[护士工作投入和自我效能感对烧伤重症监护室临床实践能力的影响]。
目的:分析护士工作投入和自我效能感对烧伤重症监护室临床实践能力的影响,探讨其潜在的作用途径。方法:采用横断面调查。2020年5月至10月,采用分层抽样方法,共选取了中国30家设有BICU的医院。在符合纳入标准的BICU护士中,他们的临床实践能力、工作投入和自我效能分别采用护理实践中定向解决问题行为自评量表(OPSN)、乌得勒支工作投入量表(UWES)和一般自我效能量表(GSES)进行评估。记录各指标的量表总分和项目平均分。采用自行设计的通用数据调查表,对护士的性别、年龄、婚姻状况、教育背景、工作年限、职称以及所属医院的经济区域进行调查,采用独立样本t检验或单因素方差分析对数据进行统计学分析。采用Pearson相关分析法分析三个评价指标的量表总分之间的相关性。基于上述三个评价指标的量表总分,建立了结构方程模型,对三个评价指数之间的关系进行了中介分析,并对结构模型进行了路径分析,采用Bootstrap方法验证了作用路径。结果:共发放问卷401份,回收有效问卷337份,有效回收率84.04%。337名护士的临床实践能力、工作投入和自我效能感总分分别为98.2±11.7、67.7±18.6和26.6±5.6,平均项目得分分别为3.9±0.5、4.5±1.2和2.7±0.6。337名护士中,女性居多,年龄40岁及以下,已婚,本科学历,工作经验≤10年;具有护士职称的护士和来自东南地区的护士均占50%左右。不同年龄、不同学历、不同工作年限的护士临床实践能力总分差异有统计学意义,和职称(F值分别为3.26、4.36、3.12和2.80,PF=4.50,PF值分别为4.91、4.50和2.91,Pr值分别为0.30和0.51,Pr=0.37,Pβ值分别为0.54和0.16,Pβ=0.29,PPC)lf疗效与临床实践能力呈正相关。工作投入可以直接影响临床实践能力,也可以通过自我效能感的中介作用间接影响临床实践力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8511
期刊介绍: The Chinese Journal of Burns is the most authoritative one in academic circles of burn medicine in China. It adheres to the principle of combining theory with practice and integrating popularization with progress and reflects advancements in clinical and scientific research in the field of burn in China. The readers of the journal include burn and plastic clinicians, and researchers focusing on burn area. The burn refers to many correlative medicine including pathophysiology, pathology, immunology, microbiology, biochemistry, cell biology, molecular biology, and bioengineering, etc. Shock, infection, internal organ injury, electrolytes and acid-base, wound repair and reconstruction, rehabilitation, all of which are also the basic problems of surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信