Lower dose of plant substance more effective in repelling Rhyzopertha dominica F . (Coleoptera, Bostrichidae) and Sitophilus granarius L. (Coleoptera, Dryophthoridae).

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Aleksandra Maria Izdebska, Małgorzata Kłyś, Magdalena Nowak-Chmura, Sylwia Koczanowicz
{"title":"Lower dose of plant substance more effective in repelling <i>Rhyzopertha dominica</i> F . (Coleoptera, Bostrichidae) and <i>Sitophilus granarius</i> L. (Coleoptera, Dryophthoridae).","authors":"Aleksandra Maria Izdebska,&nbsp;Małgorzata Kłyś,&nbsp;Magdalena Nowak-Chmura,&nbsp;Sylwia Koczanowicz","doi":"10.26444/aaem/163326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction and objective: </strong>The study compares the effect of two concentrations (0.1% and 1%) of plant material on repelling two dangerous stored pests - <i>Rhyzopertha dominica</i> F. and <i>Sitophilus granarius</i> L. Both species were treated with the essential oils of <i>Foeniculum vulgare</i> Mill., <i>Carum carvi</i> L., <i>Mentha pulegium</i> L., and <i>Cananga odorata</i> (Lam.) Hook.f. & Thomson, as well as the chemicals contained in these oils: anethole, L-carvone, pulegone and thymoquinone.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Laboratory tests were carried out at 29±1 °C with 60±5% relative humidity (RH). Repellence of insects were noted after 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 24 and 48 h.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A lower dose of essential oils and some of the tested compounds caused a stronger repellence in the specified species of beetles. In the case of R. <i>dominica</i>, the concentration of 0.1% pulegone and L-carvone had the greatest repellent effect. Differences in the repellence of R.<i> dominica</i> were found between the concentrations of 0.1%-1% among all the tested substances in each time interval. This difference ranged from 5.0%-52.92%. All substances used in the tests had a strong repellent effect on S. <i>granarius</i> (30%-100%). There were differences in the repellency of S. <i>granarius</i> between 0.1%-1% concentration in most of the tested substances in each time interval, but they were not as large as for R. <i>dominica.</i>.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The most interesting results were obtained concerning the relationship: the lower tested substance concentration caused a much stronger repellent effect of R. <i>dominica</i> and S. <i>granarius.</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":50970,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26444/aaem/163326","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction and objective: The study compares the effect of two concentrations (0.1% and 1%) of plant material on repelling two dangerous stored pests - Rhyzopertha dominica F. and Sitophilus granarius L. Both species were treated with the essential oils of Foeniculum vulgare Mill., Carum carvi L., Mentha pulegium L., and Cananga odorata (Lam.) Hook.f. & Thomson, as well as the chemicals contained in these oils: anethole, L-carvone, pulegone and thymoquinone.

Material and methods: Laboratory tests were carried out at 29±1 °C with 60±5% relative humidity (RH). Repellence of insects were noted after 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 24 and 48 h.

Results: A lower dose of essential oils and some of the tested compounds caused a stronger repellence in the specified species of beetles. In the case of R. dominica, the concentration of 0.1% pulegone and L-carvone had the greatest repellent effect. Differences in the repellence of R. dominica were found between the concentrations of 0.1%-1% among all the tested substances in each time interval. This difference ranged from 5.0%-52.92%. All substances used in the tests had a strong repellent effect on S. granarius (30%-100%). There were differences in the repellency of S. granarius between 0.1%-1% concentration in most of the tested substances in each time interval, but they were not as large as for R. dominica..

Conclusions: The most interesting results were obtained concerning the relationship: the lower tested substance concentration caused a much stronger repellent effect of R. dominica and S. granarius..

较低剂量的植物物质更能有效地驱除水稻。(鞘翅目,Bostrichidae)和石榴实蝇(鞘翅目的,鳞毛科)。
前言与目的:本研究比较了0.1%和1%两种浓度的植物材料对两种危险的贮藏害虫——大花夜蛾(Rhyzopertha dominica F.)和石榴夜蛾(Sitophilus granarius L.)的驱避效果。,Carum carvi L.、Mentha pulegium L.和Cananga odorata(Lam.)Hook.f.&Thomson,以及这些油中所含的化学物质:茴香脑、L-香芹酮、普勒酮和百里香醌。材料和方法:实验室试验在29±1°C和60±5%相对湿度(RH)下进行。在1、2、3、4、5、24和48小时后观察到昆虫的排斥作用。在多米尼加共和国的情况下,0.1%的普列酮和L-香芹酮的浓度具有最大的驱避作用。在每个时间间隔内,在所有测试物质中,在0.1%-1%的浓度之间发现了多明尼加的排斥性差异。该差异在5.0%-52.92%之间。试验中使用的所有物质都对石榴子有很强的驱避作用(30%-100%)。在每个时间间隔内,大多数受试物质在0.1%-1%的浓度范围内,格拉纳里乌斯的排斥性存在差异,但没有多明尼加大。。结论:关于这种关系,得到了最有趣的结果:较低的受试物质浓度引起了多米尼加和石榴的更强的驱避作用。。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine
Annals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
58
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: All papers within the scope indicated by the following sections of the journal may be submitted: Biological agents posing occupational risk in agriculture, forestry, food industry and wood industry and diseases caused by these agents (zoonoses, allergic and immunotoxic diseases). Health effects of chemical pollutants in agricultural areas , including occupational and non-occupational effects of agricultural chemicals (pesticides, fertilizers) and effects of industrial disposal (heavy metals, sulphur, etc.) contaminating the atmosphere, soil and water. Exposure to physical hazards associated with the use of machinery in agriculture and forestry: noise, vibration, dust. Prevention of occupational diseases in agriculture, forestry, food industry and wood industry. Work-related accidents and injuries in agriculture, forestry, food industry and wood industry: incidence, causes, social aspects and prevention. State of the health of rural communities depending on various factors: social factors, accessibility of medical care, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信