Lower dose of plant substance more effective in repelling Rhyzopertha dominica F . (Coleoptera, Bostrichidae) and Sitophilus granarius L. (Coleoptera, Dryophthoridae).
Aleksandra Maria Izdebska, Małgorzata Kłyś, Magdalena Nowak-Chmura, Sylwia Koczanowicz
{"title":"Lower dose of plant substance more effective in repelling <i>Rhyzopertha dominica</i> F . (Coleoptera, Bostrichidae) and <i>Sitophilus granarius</i> L. (Coleoptera, Dryophthoridae).","authors":"Aleksandra Maria Izdebska, Małgorzata Kłyś, Magdalena Nowak-Chmura, Sylwia Koczanowicz","doi":"10.26444/aaem/163326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction and objective: </strong>The study compares the effect of two concentrations (0.1% and 1%) of plant material on repelling two dangerous stored pests - <i>Rhyzopertha dominica</i> F. and <i>Sitophilus granarius</i> L. Both species were treated with the essential oils of <i>Foeniculum vulgare</i> Mill., <i>Carum carvi</i> L., <i>Mentha pulegium</i> L., and <i>Cananga odorata</i> (Lam.) Hook.f. & Thomson, as well as the chemicals contained in these oils: anethole, L-carvone, pulegone and thymoquinone.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Laboratory tests were carried out at 29±1 °C with 60±5% relative humidity (RH). Repellence of insects were noted after 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 24 and 48 h.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A lower dose of essential oils and some of the tested compounds caused a stronger repellence in the specified species of beetles. In the case of R. <i>dominica</i>, the concentration of 0.1% pulegone and L-carvone had the greatest repellent effect. Differences in the repellence of R.<i> dominica</i> were found between the concentrations of 0.1%-1% among all the tested substances in each time interval. This difference ranged from 5.0%-52.92%. All substances used in the tests had a strong repellent effect on S. <i>granarius</i> (30%-100%). There were differences in the repellency of S. <i>granarius</i> between 0.1%-1% concentration in most of the tested substances in each time interval, but they were not as large as for R. <i>dominica.</i>.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The most interesting results were obtained concerning the relationship: the lower tested substance concentration caused a much stronger repellent effect of R. <i>dominica</i> and S. <i>granarius.</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":50970,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26444/aaem/163326","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction and objective: The study compares the effect of two concentrations (0.1% and 1%) of plant material on repelling two dangerous stored pests - Rhyzopertha dominica F. and Sitophilus granarius L. Both species were treated with the essential oils of Foeniculum vulgare Mill., Carum carvi L., Mentha pulegium L., and Cananga odorata (Lam.) Hook.f. & Thomson, as well as the chemicals contained in these oils: anethole, L-carvone, pulegone and thymoquinone.
Material and methods: Laboratory tests were carried out at 29±1 °C with 60±5% relative humidity (RH). Repellence of insects were noted after 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 24 and 48 h.
Results: A lower dose of essential oils and some of the tested compounds caused a stronger repellence in the specified species of beetles. In the case of R. dominica, the concentration of 0.1% pulegone and L-carvone had the greatest repellent effect. Differences in the repellence of R. dominica were found between the concentrations of 0.1%-1% among all the tested substances in each time interval. This difference ranged from 5.0%-52.92%. All substances used in the tests had a strong repellent effect on S. granarius (30%-100%). There were differences in the repellency of S. granarius between 0.1%-1% concentration in most of the tested substances in each time interval, but they were not as large as for R. dominica..
Conclusions: The most interesting results were obtained concerning the relationship: the lower tested substance concentration caused a much stronger repellent effect of R. dominica and S. granarius..
期刊介绍:
All papers within the scope indicated by the following sections of the journal may be submitted:
Biological agents posing occupational risk in agriculture, forestry, food industry and wood industry and diseases caused by these agents (zoonoses, allergic and immunotoxic diseases).
Health effects of chemical pollutants in agricultural areas , including occupational and non-occupational effects of agricultural chemicals (pesticides, fertilizers) and effects of industrial disposal (heavy metals, sulphur, etc.) contaminating the atmosphere, soil and water.
Exposure to physical hazards associated with the use of machinery in agriculture and forestry: noise, vibration, dust.
Prevention of occupational diseases in agriculture, forestry, food industry and wood industry.
Work-related accidents and injuries in agriculture, forestry, food industry and wood industry: incidence, causes, social aspects and prevention.
State of the health of rural communities depending on various factors: social factors, accessibility of medical care, etc.