Real-World Analysis of Clinical and Demographic Characteristics, Treatment Patterns, and Outcomes in Predominantly Older Patients with HR+/HER2- Metastatic Breast Cancer Receiving Abemaciclib in Routine Clinical Practice.

IF 1.9 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Drugs - Real World Outcomes Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-29 DOI:10.1007/s40801-023-00391-1
Alistair Ring, Meghan Karuturi, Emily Nash Smyth, Tasneem Lokhandwala, Kristin M Sheffield, Joanne Willey, Orsolya Lunacsek, Francisco Sapunar, Zhanglin Lin Cui, Anna D Coutinho, Sarah Rybowski
{"title":"Real-World Analysis of Clinical and Demographic Characteristics, Treatment Patterns, and Outcomes in Predominantly Older Patients with HR+/HER2- Metastatic Breast Cancer Receiving Abemaciclib in Routine Clinical Practice.","authors":"Alistair Ring, Meghan Karuturi, Emily Nash Smyth, Tasneem Lokhandwala, Kristin M Sheffield, Joanne Willey, Orsolya Lunacsek, Francisco Sapunar, Zhanglin Lin Cui, Anna D Coutinho, Sarah Rybowski","doi":"10.1007/s40801-023-00391-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) is the most frequently diagnosed metastatic breast cancer (mBC) subtype. Combinations of endocrine therapy (ET) with cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4 & 6is) improve outcomes compared with ET alone. The efficacy and safety of abemaciclib among patients with HR+/HER2- mBC has been demonstrated in the MONARCH clinical trials; however, there is a paucity of real-world evidence, particularly in older patients.</p><p><strong>Methods and materials: </strong>This retrospective cohort study analyzed the electronic medical record data/charts of adult patients with HR+/HER2- mBC receiving abemaciclib in US-based community oncology settings (1 September 2017 to 30 September 2019). Patients with other primary malignancies, clinical trial enrollment, and incomplete charts were excluded. Patient characteristics, treatment attributes and patterns, and real-world outcomes (clinical benefit rate [CBR] and stable disease among patients with response data available, time to chemotherapy [TTC], time to treatment discontinuation [TTD], and progression-free survival [PFS]) were summarized. Multivariable models evaluated the association between demographic/clinical characteristics and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 448 final patients, 99% were female, with a median age of 67 years (25% were ≥ 75 years) and median follow-up of 11 months; most (60%) initiated abemaciclib within 2 years of mBC diagnosis. Patients received a median of 1 (P25 = 0, P75 = 3) prior line of therapy for mBC before abemaciclib, including other CDK4 & 6is (48%) and prior chemotherapy (31%); most (57%) had visceral disease. The CBR for the overall population was 53%, with 48% achieving stable disease. The median TTC was not reached; median TTD was 249 days (95% confidence interval [CI]: 202, 304). The median PFS was 329 days (95% CI 266, 386). The discontinuation rate of abemaciclib owing to adverse events (30%) trended higher with age (years) (P = 0.027): 18-49 (n = 42; 19%), 50-64 (n = 155; 25%), 65-74 (n = 138; 32%), 75-84 (n = 82; 37%), ≥ 85 (n = 31; 49%); only 23% of patients overall had a dose hold or reduction prior to discontinuation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These patients were older than those in the MONARCH studies with substantial visceral disease, and prior chemotherapy and CDK4 & 6i use. Discontinuation rates were higher than in previous real-world studies (11.9%), highlighting the need for proactive management to optimize outcomes, particularly in older patients with mBC.</p>","PeriodicalId":11282,"journal":{"name":"Drugs - Real World Outcomes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10730497/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drugs - Real World Outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40801-023-00391-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) is the most frequently diagnosed metastatic breast cancer (mBC) subtype. Combinations of endocrine therapy (ET) with cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4 & 6is) improve outcomes compared with ET alone. The efficacy and safety of abemaciclib among patients with HR+/HER2- mBC has been demonstrated in the MONARCH clinical trials; however, there is a paucity of real-world evidence, particularly in older patients.

Methods and materials: This retrospective cohort study analyzed the electronic medical record data/charts of adult patients with HR+/HER2- mBC receiving abemaciclib in US-based community oncology settings (1 September 2017 to 30 September 2019). Patients with other primary malignancies, clinical trial enrollment, and incomplete charts were excluded. Patient characteristics, treatment attributes and patterns, and real-world outcomes (clinical benefit rate [CBR] and stable disease among patients with response data available, time to chemotherapy [TTC], time to treatment discontinuation [TTD], and progression-free survival [PFS]) were summarized. Multivariable models evaluated the association between demographic/clinical characteristics and outcomes.

Results: Of the 448 final patients, 99% were female, with a median age of 67 years (25% were ≥ 75 years) and median follow-up of 11 months; most (60%) initiated abemaciclib within 2 years of mBC diagnosis. Patients received a median of 1 (P25 = 0, P75 = 3) prior line of therapy for mBC before abemaciclib, including other CDK4 & 6is (48%) and prior chemotherapy (31%); most (57%) had visceral disease. The CBR for the overall population was 53%, with 48% achieving stable disease. The median TTC was not reached; median TTD was 249 days (95% confidence interval [CI]: 202, 304). The median PFS was 329 days (95% CI 266, 386). The discontinuation rate of abemaciclib owing to adverse events (30%) trended higher with age (years) (P = 0.027): 18-49 (n = 42; 19%), 50-64 (n = 155; 25%), 65-74 (n = 138; 32%), 75-84 (n = 82; 37%), ≥ 85 (n = 31; 49%); only 23% of patients overall had a dose hold or reduction prior to discontinuation.

Conclusions: These patients were older than those in the MONARCH studies with substantial visceral disease, and prior chemotherapy and CDK4 & 6i use. Discontinuation rates were higher than in previous real-world studies (11.9%), highlighting the need for proactive management to optimize outcomes, particularly in older patients with mBC.

在常规临床实践中接受阿匹昔单抗治疗的主要老年HR+/HER2-转移性癌症患者的临床和人口学特征、治疗模式和结果的现实世界分析。
简介:激素受体阳性(HR+)/人表皮生长因子受体2阴性(HER2-)是最常见的转移性癌症(mBC)亚型。与单独使用ET相比,内分泌治疗(ET)与细胞周期蛋白依赖性激酶4/6抑制剂(CDK4&6is)的组合可改善疗效。在MONARCH临床试验中已经证明了阿匹昔单抗在HR+/HER2-mBC患者中的疗效和安全性;然而,现实世界中的证据很少,尤其是在老年患者中。方法和材料:这项回顾性队列研究分析了在美国社区肿瘤学环境中(2017年9月1日至2019年9月30日)接受阿培昔单抗治疗的HR+/HER2-mBC成年患者的电子病历数据/图表。排除患有其他原发性恶性肿瘤、临床试验登记和不完整图表的患者。总结了患者特征、治疗属性和模式以及真实世界的结果(有反应数据的患者的临床获益率[CRB]和稳定疾病、化疗时间[TTC]、停药时间[TTD]和无进展生存期[PFS])。多变量模型评估了人口统计学/临床特征与结果之间的相关性。结果:448名最终患者中,99%为女性,中位年龄67岁(25%≥75岁),中位随访11个月;大多数(60%)患者在诊断为mBC后2年内开始使用阿贝单抗。患者在阿匹昔单抗前接受mBC治疗的中位数为1(P25=0,P75=3),包括其他CDK4&6is(48%)和既往化疗(31%);大多数(57%)患有内脏疾病。总人群的CBR为53%,48%的人病情稳定。未达到TTC中位数;中位TTD为249天(95%置信区间[CI]:202304)。中位PFS为329天(95%CI 266386)。由于不良事件导致的阿匹昔单抗停药率(30%)随年龄(年)呈上升趋势(P=0.027):18-49(n=42;19%),50-64(n=155;25%),65-74(n=138;32%),75-84(n=82;37%),≥85(n=31;49%);只有23%的患者在停药前保持或减少了剂量。结论:这些患者年龄比MONARCH研究中的患者大,有严重的内脏疾病,既往有化疗和CDK4&6i使用。停药率高于之前的真实世界研究(11.9%),这突出了积极管理以优化结果的必要性,尤其是在患有mBC的老年患者中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Drugs - Real World Outcomes
Drugs - Real World Outcomes PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
49
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Drugs - Real World Outcomes targets original research and definitive reviews regarding the use of real-world data to evaluate health outcomes and inform healthcare decision-making on drugs, devices and other interventions in clinical practice. The journal includes, but is not limited to, the following research areas: Using registries/databases/health records and other non-selected observational datasets to investigate: drug use and treatment outcomes prescription patterns drug safety signals adherence to treatment guidelines benefit : risk profiles comparative effectiveness economic analyses including cost-of-illness Data-driven research methodologies, including the capture, curation, search, sharing, analysis and interpretation of ‘big data’ Techniques and approaches to optimise real-world modelling.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信