Defining chronic rejection in vascularized composite allografts - do we have reliable surrogates to look for?

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 TRANSPLANTATION
Jean Kanitakis
{"title":"Defining chronic rejection in vascularized composite allografts - do we have reliable surrogates to look for?","authors":"Jean Kanitakis","doi":"10.1097/MOT.0000000000001110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Chronic rejection (CR) is a major threat in the field of vascularized composite tissue allografts (VCAs) as it causes graft dysfunction and usually graft loss. Unfortunately, knowledge of CR in VCA is incomplete because of the limited number of VCA recipients, the heterogeneous nature of VCAs and the short follow-up.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>The diagnosis of CR in VCA has relied on clinical and pathological findings. Clinical changes include graft fibrosis, dyschromia and ischemic/necrotic ulcerations. Pathological changes primarily affect allograft vessels and manifest with graft vasculopathy (i.e. myo-intimal proliferation and luminal narrowing of allograft vessels, leading to graft ischemia). Attempts are made to diagnose CR with non- or minimally-invasive techniques, such as imaging studies (ultrasound biomicroscopy, functional magnetic resonance imaging) and serum biomarkers. These techniques provide interesting results and further insight into the mechanisms of CR in VCA.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>The diagnosis of CR in VCA still relies mainly on clinicopathological graft alterations; unfortunately, these become overt rather late during the rejection process, when reversal of CR is problematic. More recent, minimally- or non-invasive techniques have provided encouraging results, but their usefulness in the diagnosis of CR requires further studies. These data highlight the paramount importance of CR prevention.</p>","PeriodicalId":10900,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Organ Transplantation","volume":" ","pages":"440-445"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Organ Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MOT.0000000000001110","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TRANSPLANTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: Chronic rejection (CR) is a major threat in the field of vascularized composite tissue allografts (VCAs) as it causes graft dysfunction and usually graft loss. Unfortunately, knowledge of CR in VCA is incomplete because of the limited number of VCA recipients, the heterogeneous nature of VCAs and the short follow-up.

Recent findings: The diagnosis of CR in VCA has relied on clinical and pathological findings. Clinical changes include graft fibrosis, dyschromia and ischemic/necrotic ulcerations. Pathological changes primarily affect allograft vessels and manifest with graft vasculopathy (i.e. myo-intimal proliferation and luminal narrowing of allograft vessels, leading to graft ischemia). Attempts are made to diagnose CR with non- or minimally-invasive techniques, such as imaging studies (ultrasound biomicroscopy, functional magnetic resonance imaging) and serum biomarkers. These techniques provide interesting results and further insight into the mechanisms of CR in VCA.

Summary: The diagnosis of CR in VCA still relies mainly on clinicopathological graft alterations; unfortunately, these become overt rather late during the rejection process, when reversal of CR is problematic. More recent, minimally- or non-invasive techniques have provided encouraging results, but their usefulness in the diagnosis of CR requires further studies. These data highlight the paramount importance of CR prevention.

定义血管化复合同种异体移植物的慢性排斥反应——我们有可靠的替代品吗?
综述目的:慢性排斥反应(CR)是血管化复合组织同种异体移植物(VCAs)领域的主要威胁,因为它会导致移植物功能障碍,通常导致移植物丢失。不幸的是,由于VCA受体的数量有限、VCA的异质性和随访时间短,对VCA CR的了解并不完整。最近的研究结果:VCA中CR的诊断依赖于临床和病理结果。临床变化包括移植物纤维化、色度异常和缺血性/坏死性溃疡。病理变化主要影响移植物血管,表现为移植物血管病变(即肌内膜增生和移植物血管管腔狭窄,导致移植物缺血)。尝试用非侵入性或微创技术诊断CR,如成像研究(超声生物显微镜、功能性磁共振成像)和血清生物标志物。这些技术提供了有趣的结果,并进一步深入了解了VCA中CR的机制;不幸的是,在拒绝过程中,当CR的逆转有问题时,这些症状会在相当晚的时候变得明显。最近,微创或非侵入性技术提供了令人鼓舞的结果,但它们在CR诊断中的有用性需要进一步研究。这些数据突出了CR预防的极端重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.50%
发文量
124
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​Current Opinion in Organ Transplantation is an indispensable resource featuring key, up-to-date and important advances in the field from around the world. Led by renowned guest editors for each section, every bimonthly issue of Current Opinion in Organ Transplantation delivers a fresh insight into topics such as stem cell transplantation, immunosuppression, tolerance induction and organ preservation and procurement. With 18 sections in total, the journal provides a convenient and thorough review of the field and will be of interest to researchers, surgeons and other healthcare professionals alike.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信