Global Odds Model with Proportional Odds and Trend Odds Applied to Gross and Microscopic Brain Infarcts.

Q3 Medicine
Biostatistics and Epidemiology Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2018-07-26 DOI:10.1080/24709360.2018.1500089
Ana W Capuano, Robert Wilson, Julie A Schneider, Sue E Leurgans, David A Bennett
{"title":"Global Odds Model with Proportional Odds and Trend Odds Applied to Gross and Microscopic Brain Infarcts.","authors":"Ana W Capuano, Robert Wilson, Julie A Schneider, Sue E Leurgans, David A Bennett","doi":"10.1080/24709360.2018.1500089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Medical and epidemiological researchers commonly study ordinal measures of symptoms or pathology. Some of these studies involve two correlated ordinal measures. There is often an interest in including both measures in the modeling. It is common to see analyses that consider one of the measures as a predictor in the model for the other measure as outcome. There are, however, issues with these analyses including biased estimate of the probabilities and a decreased power due to multicollinearity (since they share some predictors). These issues create a necessity to examine both variables as simultaneous outcomes, by assessing the marginal probabilities for each outcome (i.e. using a proportional odds model) and the association between the two outcomes (i.e. using a constant global odds model). In this work we extend this model using a parsimonious option when the constraints imposed by assumptions of proportional marginal odds and constant global odds do not hold. We compare approaches by using simulations and by analyzing data on brain infarcts in older adults. Age at death is a marginal predictor of gross infarcts and also a marginal predictor of microscopic infarcts, but does not modify the association between gross and microscopic infarcts.</p>","PeriodicalId":37240,"journal":{"name":"Biostatistics and Epidemiology","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10512893/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biostatistics and Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24709360.2018.1500089","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/7/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Medical and epidemiological researchers commonly study ordinal measures of symptoms or pathology. Some of these studies involve two correlated ordinal measures. There is often an interest in including both measures in the modeling. It is common to see analyses that consider one of the measures as a predictor in the model for the other measure as outcome. There are, however, issues with these analyses including biased estimate of the probabilities and a decreased power due to multicollinearity (since they share some predictors). These issues create a necessity to examine both variables as simultaneous outcomes, by assessing the marginal probabilities for each outcome (i.e. using a proportional odds model) and the association between the two outcomes (i.e. using a constant global odds model). In this work we extend this model using a parsimonious option when the constraints imposed by assumptions of proportional marginal odds and constant global odds do not hold. We compare approaches by using simulations and by analyzing data on brain infarcts in older adults. Age at death is a marginal predictor of gross infarcts and also a marginal predictor of microscopic infarcts, but does not modify the association between gross and microscopic infarcts.

具有比例赔率和趋势赔率的全局赔率模型应用于大体和微观脑梗塞。
医学和流行病学研究人员通常研究症状或病理的顺序测量。其中一些研究涉及两个相关的序数测度。在建模中包含这两个度量通常是一种兴趣。常见的分析是,将其中一项指标视为模型中的预测指标,将另一项指标作为结果。然而,这些分析存在一些问题,包括概率的偏差估计和由于多重共线性而导致的功率下降(因为它们共享一些预测因子)。这些问题产生了将两个变量作为同时结果进行检查的必要性,通过评估每个结果的边际概率(即使用比例优势模型)和两个结果之间的关联(即使用恒定全局优势模型)。在这项工作中,当比例边际赔率和恒定全局赔率的假设所施加的约束不成立时,我们使用简约选项来扩展该模型。我们通过模拟和分析老年人脑梗死的数据来比较方法。死亡年龄是大体梗死的边缘预测因子,也是微观梗死的边缘预报因子,但不能改变大体梗死和微观梗死之间的关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biostatistics and Epidemiology
Biostatistics and Epidemiology Medicine-Health Informatics
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信