[Epidemiological characteristics and risk factors of sepsis development and death in patients with extremely severe burns].

Q3 Medicine
X L Pan, Z K Zhu, T Shen, F Jin, X G Wang, J Yin, C M Han
{"title":"[Epidemiological characteristics and risk factors of sepsis development and death in patients with extremely severe burns].","authors":"X L Pan, Z K Zhu, T Shen, F Jin, X G Wang, J Yin, C M Han","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20220806-00336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To explore the epidemiological characteristics and risk factors of sepsis development and death in patients with extremely severe burns. <b>Methods:</b> A retrospective case series study was conducted. From January 2017 to December 2021, 135 patients with extremely severe burns who met the inclusion criteria were admitted to the Department of Burn and Wound Repair of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, including 100 males and 35 females, aged 18-84 years. The incidence and diagnosis time of sepsis, the rate of positive microbial culture of blood samples (hereinafter referred to as positive blood culture), and the mortality rate of all patients, as well as the incidence of sepsis and the pathogen of infection in patients with positive blood culture were recorded (statistically analyzed with chi-square test or Fisher's exact probability test). According to the occurrence of sepsis, all patients were divided into sepsis group (58 cases) and non-sepsis group (77 cases), and the gender, age, body mass index, history of hypertension, history of diabetes, combination of inhalation injury, burn site, burn type, total burn area, and combined injury of patients were compared between the two groups. According to the outcome, all patients were divided into death group (37 cases) and survival group (98 cases), and the aforementioned data grouped according to sepsis as well as the stability of shock period and the combination of sepsis of patients were compared between the two groups. The aforementioned data between two groups were statistically analyzed with univariate analysis of independent sample <i>t</i> test, Wilcoxon rank-sum test, Mann-Whitney <i>U</i> test, chi-square test, or Fisher's exact probability test. Factors with <i>P</i><0.1 were selected for multivariate logistic regression analysis to screen independent risk factors of sepsis and death in patients with extremely severe burns. <b>Results:</b> Among all patients, the incidence of sepsis was 42.96% (58/135), the diagnosis time of sepsis was 14 (7, 24) d after injury, the positive blood culture rate was 62.22% (84/135), and the mortality rate was 27.41% (37/135). The incidence of sepsis of patients with positive blood culture was 69.05% (58/84). The top 5 pathogenic bacteria in the detection rate of septic patients with positive blood culture were <i>Acinetobacter baumannii</i>, <i>Klebsiella pneumoniae</i>, <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i>, <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i>, and <i>Enterobacter cloacae</i>, ranking from high to low, and the proportion of <i>Acinetobacter baumannii</i> infected was significantly higher than that of non-septic patients with positive blood culture (<i>χ</i><sup>2</sup>=7.49, <i>P</i><0.05). Compared with those in non-sepsis group, the proportion of combination of inhalation injury, the proportion of perineal burns, and the total burn area of patients in sepsis group increased significantly (with <i>χ</i><sup>2</sup> values of 11.08 and 17.47, respectively, <i>Z</i>=5.68, <i>P</i><0.05), while the other indicators did not change significantly (<i>P</i>>0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that combination of inhalation injury, total burn area ≥80% total body surface area (TBSA), and perineal burns were independent risk factors for patients with extremely severe burns developing sepsis (with odds ratios of 3.15, 7.24, and 3.24, respectively, with 95% confidence intervals of 1.07 to 9.29, 1.79 to 29.34, and 1.21 to 8.68, respectively, <i>P</i><0.05). Compared with those in survival group, the proportion of combination of inhalation injury, the proportion of perineal burns, and the proportion of combination of sepsis (with <i>χ</i><sup>2</sup> values of 6.55, 11.64, and 22.26, respectively, <i>P</i> values all <0.05), total burn area (<i>Z</i>=4.25, <i>P</i><0.05), and proportion of instability of shock period (<i>P</i><0.05) of patients in death group all increased significantly, while the other indicators did not change significantly (<i>P</i>>0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the instability of shock period and combination of sepsis were independent risk factors for death of patients with extremely severe burns (with odds ratios of 4.87 and 3.45, respectively, with 95% confidence intervals of 1.21 to 19.57 and 1.28 to 9.33, respectively, <i>P</i><0.05). <b>Conclusions:</b> Patients with extremely severe burns have a high incidence of sepsis and a high mortality rate. The peak period of sepsis onset is 2 weeks after injury, with <i>Acinetobacter baumannii</i> as the most prominent infectious pathogen. Combination of inhalation injury, total burn area ≥80% TBSA, and perineal burns are independent risk factors for extremely severe burn patients complicated with sepsis, and combination of sepsis and instability of shock period are independent risk factors for death of patients with extremely severe burns.</p>","PeriodicalId":24004,"journal":{"name":"Zhonghua shao shang za zhi = Zhonghua shaoshang zazhi = Chinese journal of burns","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zhonghua shao shang za zhi = Zhonghua shaoshang zazhi = Chinese journal of burns","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20220806-00336","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To explore the epidemiological characteristics and risk factors of sepsis development and death in patients with extremely severe burns. Methods: A retrospective case series study was conducted. From January 2017 to December 2021, 135 patients with extremely severe burns who met the inclusion criteria were admitted to the Department of Burn and Wound Repair of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, including 100 males and 35 females, aged 18-84 years. The incidence and diagnosis time of sepsis, the rate of positive microbial culture of blood samples (hereinafter referred to as positive blood culture), and the mortality rate of all patients, as well as the incidence of sepsis and the pathogen of infection in patients with positive blood culture were recorded (statistically analyzed with chi-square test or Fisher's exact probability test). According to the occurrence of sepsis, all patients were divided into sepsis group (58 cases) and non-sepsis group (77 cases), and the gender, age, body mass index, history of hypertension, history of diabetes, combination of inhalation injury, burn site, burn type, total burn area, and combined injury of patients were compared between the two groups. According to the outcome, all patients were divided into death group (37 cases) and survival group (98 cases), and the aforementioned data grouped according to sepsis as well as the stability of shock period and the combination of sepsis of patients were compared between the two groups. The aforementioned data between two groups were statistically analyzed with univariate analysis of independent sample t test, Wilcoxon rank-sum test, Mann-Whitney U test, chi-square test, or Fisher's exact probability test. Factors with P<0.1 were selected for multivariate logistic regression analysis to screen independent risk factors of sepsis and death in patients with extremely severe burns. Results: Among all patients, the incidence of sepsis was 42.96% (58/135), the diagnosis time of sepsis was 14 (7, 24) d after injury, the positive blood culture rate was 62.22% (84/135), and the mortality rate was 27.41% (37/135). The incidence of sepsis of patients with positive blood culture was 69.05% (58/84). The top 5 pathogenic bacteria in the detection rate of septic patients with positive blood culture were Acinetobacter baumannii, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, and Enterobacter cloacae, ranking from high to low, and the proportion of Acinetobacter baumannii infected was significantly higher than that of non-septic patients with positive blood culture (χ2=7.49, P<0.05). Compared with those in non-sepsis group, the proportion of combination of inhalation injury, the proportion of perineal burns, and the total burn area of patients in sepsis group increased significantly (with χ2 values of 11.08 and 17.47, respectively, Z=5.68, P<0.05), while the other indicators did not change significantly (P>0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that combination of inhalation injury, total burn area ≥80% total body surface area (TBSA), and perineal burns were independent risk factors for patients with extremely severe burns developing sepsis (with odds ratios of 3.15, 7.24, and 3.24, respectively, with 95% confidence intervals of 1.07 to 9.29, 1.79 to 29.34, and 1.21 to 8.68, respectively, P<0.05). Compared with those in survival group, the proportion of combination of inhalation injury, the proportion of perineal burns, and the proportion of combination of sepsis (with χ2 values of 6.55, 11.64, and 22.26, respectively, P values all <0.05), total burn area (Z=4.25, P<0.05), and proportion of instability of shock period (P<0.05) of patients in death group all increased significantly, while the other indicators did not change significantly (P>0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the instability of shock period and combination of sepsis were independent risk factors for death of patients with extremely severe burns (with odds ratios of 4.87 and 3.45, respectively, with 95% confidence intervals of 1.21 to 19.57 and 1.28 to 9.33, respectively, P<0.05). Conclusions: Patients with extremely severe burns have a high incidence of sepsis and a high mortality rate. The peak period of sepsis onset is 2 weeks after injury, with Acinetobacter baumannii as the most prominent infectious pathogen. Combination of inhalation injury, total burn area ≥80% TBSA, and perineal burns are independent risk factors for extremely severe burn patients complicated with sepsis, and combination of sepsis and instability of shock period are independent risk factors for death of patients with extremely severe burns.

[极重度烧伤患者败血症发展和死亡的流行病学特征和危险因素]。
目的:探讨特重度烧伤并发败血症死亡的流行病学特征及危险因素。方法:采用回顾性病例系列研究。2017年1月至2021年12月,浙江大学医学院第二附属医院烧伤与创面修复科共收治135例符合入选标准的特重度烧伤患者,其中男性100例,女性35例,年龄18-84岁。记录败血症的发生率和诊断时间、血液样本微生物培养阳性率(以下简称血培养阳性)和所有患者的死亡率,以及血培养阳性患者的败血症发生率和感染病原体(用卡方检验或Fisher精确概率检验进行统计分析)。根据败血症的发生情况,将所有患者分为败血症组(58例)和非败血症组(77例),并比较两组患者的性别、年龄、体重指数、高血压史、糖尿病史、吸入性合并损伤、烧伤部位、烧伤类型、总烧伤面积和合并损伤情况。根据结果,将所有患者分为死亡组(37例)和存活组(98例),并比较两组患者根据败血症、休克期稳定性和败血症合并情况分组的上述数据。采用独立样本t检验、Wilcoxon秩和检验、Mann-Whitney U检验、卡方检验或Fisher精确概率检验的单变量分析对两组之间的上述数据进行统计分析。结果:在所有患者中,败血症的发生率为42.96%(58/135),败血症的诊断时间为损伤后14(7,24)d,血培养阳性率为62.22%(84/135),死亡率为27.41%(37/135)。血培养阳性患者败血症发生率为69.05%(58/84)。血培养阳性脓毒症患者检出率前5位的病原菌依次为鲍曼不动杆菌、肺炎克雷伯菌、铜绿假单胞菌、金黄色葡萄球菌和阴沟肠杆菌,从高到低依次排列,鲍曼不动杆菌感染率显著高于血培养阳性的非脓毒症患者(χ2=7.49,Pχ2值分别为11.08和17.47,Z=5.68,PP>0.05),和会阴烧伤是极重度烧伤患者发生败血症的独立危险因素(比值比分别为3.15、7.24和3.24,95%置信区间分别为1.07至9.29、1.79至29.34和1.21至8.68,Pχ2值分别为6.55、11.64和22.26,P值均为Z=4.25,PPP>0.05)休克期不稳定和合并败血症是严重烧伤患者死亡的独立危险因素(优势比分别为4.87和3.45,95%置信区间分别为1.21至19.57和1.28至9.33。结论:极重度烧伤患者败血症发病率高,死亡率高。败血症发病高峰期为损伤后2周,鲍曼不动杆菌是最突出的感染病原体y、 总烧伤面积≥80%TBSA,会阴烧伤是极重度烧伤并发败血症的独立危险因素,败血症合并休克期不稳定是极重度烫伤患者死亡的独立危险因子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8511
期刊介绍: The Chinese Journal of Burns is the most authoritative one in academic circles of burn medicine in China. It adheres to the principle of combining theory with practice and integrating popularization with progress and reflects advancements in clinical and scientific research in the field of burn in China. The readers of the journal include burn and plastic clinicians, and researchers focusing on burn area. The burn refers to many correlative medicine including pathophysiology, pathology, immunology, microbiology, biochemistry, cell biology, molecular biology, and bioengineering, etc. Shock, infection, internal organ injury, electrolytes and acid-base, wound repair and reconstruction, rehabilitation, all of which are also the basic problems of surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信