Ligaments Laxity and Elongation at Injuryin Flexed knees during Lateral Impact Conditions.

Q2 Medicine
Sahar Benadi, Xavier Trosseille, Philippe Petit, Jérôme Uriot, Yoann Lafon, Philippe Beillas
{"title":"Ligaments Laxity and Elongation at Injuryin Flexed knees during Lateral Impact Conditions.","authors":"Sahar Benadi,&nbsp;Xavier Trosseille,&nbsp;Philippe Petit,&nbsp;Jérôme Uriot,&nbsp;Yoann Lafon,&nbsp;Philippe Beillas","doi":"10.4271/2022-22-0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The knee is one of the regions of interest for pedestrian safety assessment. Past testing to study knee ligament injuries for pedestrian impact only included knees in full extension and mostly focused on global responses. As the knee flexion angle and the initial ligament laxity may affect the elongation at which ligaments fail, the objectives of this study were (1) to design an experimental protocol to assess the laxity of knee ligaments before measuring their elongation at failure, (2) to apply it in paired knee tests at two flexion angles (10 and 45 degrees). The laxity tests combined strain gauges to measure bone strains near insertions that would result from ligament forces and a custom machine to exercise the knee in all directions. Failure was assessed using a four-point bending setup with additional degrees of freedom on the axial rotation and displacement of the femur. A template was designed to ensure that the two setups used the exact same starting position. The protocol was applied to six pairs of knees which were tested until the failure of all ligaments. In the laxity tests, a higher compliance of the knee was observed at 45 degrees compared to 10 degrees. Minimum lengths associated with the beginning of bone loading were also successfully identified for the collateral ligaments, but the process was less successful for the cruciate ligaments. The failure tests suggested increased elongation and length at failure for the ligaments and their bundles at 45°. This could be consistent with the higher compliance in static test, but the minimum lengths identified on the collaterals did not explain this difference during failure. The results highlight the possible relationship between position, laxity and elongation at failure in a lateral loading and provide a dataset including 3D coordinates of insertions to continue the investigation using a modelling approach. Perspectives are also outlined to improve upon the laxity determination protocol.</p>","PeriodicalId":35289,"journal":{"name":"Stapp car crash journal","volume":"66 ","pages":"69-97"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stapp car crash journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4271/2022-22-0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The knee is one of the regions of interest for pedestrian safety assessment. Past testing to study knee ligament injuries for pedestrian impact only included knees in full extension and mostly focused on global responses. As the knee flexion angle and the initial ligament laxity may affect the elongation at which ligaments fail, the objectives of this study were (1) to design an experimental protocol to assess the laxity of knee ligaments before measuring their elongation at failure, (2) to apply it in paired knee tests at two flexion angles (10 and 45 degrees). The laxity tests combined strain gauges to measure bone strains near insertions that would result from ligament forces and a custom machine to exercise the knee in all directions. Failure was assessed using a four-point bending setup with additional degrees of freedom on the axial rotation and displacement of the femur. A template was designed to ensure that the two setups used the exact same starting position. The protocol was applied to six pairs of knees which were tested until the failure of all ligaments. In the laxity tests, a higher compliance of the knee was observed at 45 degrees compared to 10 degrees. Minimum lengths associated with the beginning of bone loading were also successfully identified for the collateral ligaments, but the process was less successful for the cruciate ligaments. The failure tests suggested increased elongation and length at failure for the ligaments and their bundles at 45°. This could be consistent with the higher compliance in static test, but the minimum lengths identified on the collaterals did not explain this difference during failure. The results highlight the possible relationship between position, laxity and elongation at failure in a lateral loading and provide a dataset including 3D coordinates of insertions to continue the investigation using a modelling approach. Perspectives are also outlined to improve upon the laxity determination protocol.

侧面碰撞条件下弯曲膝盖受伤时韧带松弛和伸长率。
膝盖是行人安全评估的关注区域之一。过去研究行人撞击膝盖韧带损伤的测试只包括完全伸展的膝盖,主要关注全球反应。由于膝关节屈曲角度和初始韧带松弛度可能会影响韧带失效时的伸长率,本研究的目的是(1)设计一个实验方案,在测量其失效伸长率之前评估膝关节韧带松弛度,(2)将其应用于两个屈曲角度(10度和45度)的成对膝关节测试。松弛度测试结合了应变仪来测量插入处附近的骨骼应变,这将由韧带力和一台定制的机器来全方位锻炼膝盖。使用四点弯曲装置评估失效,股骨轴向旋转和位移具有额外的自由度。设计了一个模板,以确保两个设置使用完全相同的起始位置。该方案应用于六对膝盖,直到所有韧带失效。在松弛度测试中,与10度相比,在45度时观察到膝盖的顺应性更高。副韧带也成功地确定了与骨负荷开始相关的最小长度,但十字韧带的这一过程不太成功。失效测试表明,韧带及其束在45°时的断裂伸长率和长度增加。这可能与静态测试中较高的顺应性一致,但抵押品上确定的最小长度并不能解释失败期间的这种差异。研究结果强调了横向载荷中位置、松弛度和失效伸长率之间的可能关系,并提供了一个包括插入物三维坐标的数据集,以使用建模方法继续研究。还概述了改进松懈度确定方案的前景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Stapp car crash journal
Stapp car crash journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信