Could the IgA isotype provide additional information in systemic sclerosis patients? A retrospective study entailing IgA isotyping in a Mediterranean systemic sclerosis cohort.

IF 3.4 4区 医学 Q2 RHEUMATOLOGY
Albert Pérez-Isidro, Gema M Lledó-Ibáñez, Noemí de Moner, Maria Torradeflot, María José Martínez, Gerard Espinosa, Mercè Tena Campos, Maresa Grundhuber, Odette Viñas, Estíbaliz Ruiz-Ortiz
{"title":"Could the IgA isotype provide additional information in systemic sclerosis patients? A retrospective study entailing IgA isotyping in a Mediterranean systemic sclerosis cohort.","authors":"Albert Pérez-Isidro, Gema M Lledó-Ibáñez, Noemí de Moner, Maria Torradeflot, María José Martínez, Gerard Espinosa, Mercè Tena Campos, Maresa Grundhuber, Odette Viñas, Estíbaliz Ruiz-Ortiz","doi":"10.55563/clinexprheumatol/qijvcj","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Anti-CENP-B (ACA), anti-topoisomerase I (ATA) and anti-RNA polymerase III (RP3) autoantibodies are included in the 2013 SSc-ACR/EULAR classification criteria. The detection of additional autoantibodies is of interest when those are negative. Additionally, we wonder if the IgA isotype might play a role in SSc. The aims of the study were to assess the prevalence of ACA, ATA, RP3, and Ro52 autoantibodies of IgG and IgA isotype and to describe their association with clinical manifestations in a cohort of patients with SSc.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Samples from 97 patients with SSc fulfilling the 2013 ACR/EULAR classification criteria, and 50 blood donors were included and tested for IgA and IgG isotypes of ACA, ATA, RP3, and Ro52 by FEIA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prevalence of IgG+IgA isotypes for the same specificity was 62.5%, 82.6%, 80.0%, 36.8%, for ACA, ATA, RP3 and Ro52, respectively. Isolated IgG was present in 35.4%, 13.0%, 20.0% and 42.1% of patients for ACA, ATA, RP3 and Ro52, respectively. Only six patients were isolated IgA for a unique specificity. Clinically, ILD tended to be associated with ATA-IgG and ATA-IgG+IgA, telangiectasias with ACA-IgG+IgA and arthritis with ACA-IgA. Indeed, digital ulcers were more frequent in ATA-IgG patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most of the patients presented ACA, ATA, or RP3 autoantibodies of IgA isotype in addition to IgG. Regarding clinical relevance, Ro52-IgG+IgA and ACA-IgG had a tendency towards sineSSc phenotype, while ACA-IgG+IgA to lcSSc phenotype. Thus, if confirmed, the determination of ACA-IgA could provide a tool to stratify patients according to the cutaneous phenotype.</p>","PeriodicalId":10274,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and experimental rheumatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and experimental rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55563/clinexprheumatol/qijvcj","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Anti-CENP-B (ACA), anti-topoisomerase I (ATA) and anti-RNA polymerase III (RP3) autoantibodies are included in the 2013 SSc-ACR/EULAR classification criteria. The detection of additional autoantibodies is of interest when those are negative. Additionally, we wonder if the IgA isotype might play a role in SSc. The aims of the study were to assess the prevalence of ACA, ATA, RP3, and Ro52 autoantibodies of IgG and IgA isotype and to describe their association with clinical manifestations in a cohort of patients with SSc.

Methods: Samples from 97 patients with SSc fulfilling the 2013 ACR/EULAR classification criteria, and 50 blood donors were included and tested for IgA and IgG isotypes of ACA, ATA, RP3, and Ro52 by FEIA.

Results: The prevalence of IgG+IgA isotypes for the same specificity was 62.5%, 82.6%, 80.0%, 36.8%, for ACA, ATA, RP3 and Ro52, respectively. Isolated IgG was present in 35.4%, 13.0%, 20.0% and 42.1% of patients for ACA, ATA, RP3 and Ro52, respectively. Only six patients were isolated IgA for a unique specificity. Clinically, ILD tended to be associated with ATA-IgG and ATA-IgG+IgA, telangiectasias with ACA-IgG+IgA and arthritis with ACA-IgA. Indeed, digital ulcers were more frequent in ATA-IgG patients.

Conclusions: Most of the patients presented ACA, ATA, or RP3 autoantibodies of IgA isotype in addition to IgG. Regarding clinical relevance, Ro52-IgG+IgA and ACA-IgG had a tendency towards sineSSc phenotype, while ACA-IgG+IgA to lcSSc phenotype. Thus, if confirmed, the determination of ACA-IgA could provide a tool to stratify patients according to the cutaneous phenotype.

IgA同种型能为系统性硬化症患者提供更多信息吗?地中海系统性硬化症队列中IgA同种型的回顾性研究。
目的:抗-CENP-B(ACA)、抗拓扑异构酶I(ATA)和抗RNA聚合酶III(RP3)自身抗体被纳入2013年SSc-ACR/EULAR分类标准。当其他自身抗体为阴性时,检测这些抗体是令人感兴趣的。此外,我们想知道IgA同种型是否可能在SSc中发挥作用。本研究的目的是评估ACA、ATA、RP3和Ro52 IgG和IgA同种型自身抗体的患病率,并描述其与SSc患者队列临床表现的关系,结果:对于ACA、ATA、RP3和Ro52,相同特异性的IgG+IgA同种型的患病率分别为62.5%、82.6%、80.0%和36.8%。ACA、ATA、RP3和Ro52患者的分离IgG分别为35.4%、13.0%、20.0%和42.1%。只有6名患者因其独特的特异性而被分离出IgA。临床上,ILD倾向于与ATA IgG和ATA IgG+IgA相关,与ACA IgG+IgG相关的毛细血管扩张症和ACA IgA相关的关节炎。事实上,数字溃疡在ATA IgG患者中更为常见。结论:除IgG外,大多数患者还表现出ACA、ATA或RP3自身抗体。关于临床相关性,Ro52IgG+IgA和ACA-IgG有向sineSSc表型的趋势,而ACA-IgG+IgA-lcSSc表型。因此,如果得到证实,ACA-IgA的测定可以提供一种根据皮肤表型对患者进行分层的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
18.90%
发文量
377
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology is a bi-monthly international peer-reviewed journal which has been covering all clinical, experimental and translational aspects of musculoskeletal, arthritic and connective tissue diseases since 1983.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信