Cholecystectomy following endoscopic clearance of common bile duct during the same admission.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Canadian Journal of Surgery Pub Date : 2023-09-21 Print Date: 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1503/cjs.008322
Eric Bergeron, Théo Doyon, Thibaut Manière, Étienne Désilets
{"title":"Cholecystectomy following endoscopic clearance of common bile duct during the same admission.","authors":"Eric Bergeron,&nbsp;Théo Doyon,&nbsp;Thibaut Manière,&nbsp;Étienne Désilets","doi":"10.1503/cjs.008322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The recurrence of common bile duct stones and other biliary events after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is frequent. Despite recommendations for early cholecystectomy, intervention during the same admission is carried out inconsistently.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed the records of patients who underwent ERCP for gallstone disease and common bile duct clearance followed by cholecystectomy between July 2012 and June 2022. Patients were divided into 2 groups: the index group underwent cholecystectomy during the same admission and the delayed group was discharged and had their cholecystectomy postponed. Data on demographics and prognosis factors were collected and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study population was composed of 268 patients, with 71 (26.6%) having undergone cholecystectomy during the same admission after common bile duct clearance with ERCP. A greater proportion of patients aged 80 years and older were in the index group than in the delayed group. The American Society of Anesthesiologists score was significantly higher in the index group. There was no significant difference between groups regarding surgical complications, open cholecystectomy and death. The operative time was significantly longer in the delayed group. Among patients with delayed cholecystectomy, 18.3% had at least 1 recurrence of common bile duct stones (CBDS) and 38.6% had recurrence of any gallstone-related events before cholecystectomy. None of these events occurred in the the index group. There was no difference in the recurrence of CBDS and other biliary events after initial diagnosis associated with stone disease.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Cholecystectomy during the same admission after common bile duct clearance is safe, even in older adults with comorbidities. Compared with delayed cholecystectomy, it was not associated with adverse outcomes and may have prevented recurrence of biliary events.</p>","PeriodicalId":9573,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Surgery","volume":"66 5","pages":"E477-E484"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/c1/ef/066E477.PMC10521812.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1503/cjs.008322","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The recurrence of common bile duct stones and other biliary events after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is frequent. Despite recommendations for early cholecystectomy, intervention during the same admission is carried out inconsistently.

Methods: We reviewed the records of patients who underwent ERCP for gallstone disease and common bile duct clearance followed by cholecystectomy between July 2012 and June 2022. Patients were divided into 2 groups: the index group underwent cholecystectomy during the same admission and the delayed group was discharged and had their cholecystectomy postponed. Data on demographics and prognosis factors were collected and analyzed.

Results: The study population was composed of 268 patients, with 71 (26.6%) having undergone cholecystectomy during the same admission after common bile duct clearance with ERCP. A greater proportion of patients aged 80 years and older were in the index group than in the delayed group. The American Society of Anesthesiologists score was significantly higher in the index group. There was no significant difference between groups regarding surgical complications, open cholecystectomy and death. The operative time was significantly longer in the delayed group. Among patients with delayed cholecystectomy, 18.3% had at least 1 recurrence of common bile duct stones (CBDS) and 38.6% had recurrence of any gallstone-related events before cholecystectomy. None of these events occurred in the the index group. There was no difference in the recurrence of CBDS and other biliary events after initial diagnosis associated with stone disease.

Conclusion: Cholecystectomy during the same admission after common bile duct clearance is safe, even in older adults with comorbidities. Compared with delayed cholecystectomy, it was not associated with adverse outcomes and may have prevented recurrence of biliary events.

Abstract Image

在同一次入院期间,内镜下清除总胆管后进行胆囊切除术。
背景:内镜下逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)后胆总管结石和其他胆道事件的复发是常见的。尽管有早期胆囊切除术的建议,但在同一次入院期间进行的干预并不一致。方法:我们回顾了2012年7月至2022年6月期间因胆囊结石和胆总管清除术而接受ERCP的胆囊切除术患者的记录。患者被分为2组:指标组在同一入院期间接受胆囊切除术,延迟组出院并推迟胆囊切除术。收集并分析人口统计数据和预后因素。结果:研究人群包括268名患者,其中71人(26.6%)在ERCP清除胆总管后的同一入院期间接受了胆囊切除术。指数组中80岁及以上患者的比例高于延迟组。美国麻醉师协会的评分在该指数组中明显较高。两组在手术并发症、胆囊切除术和死亡方面没有显著差异。延迟组的手术时间明显延长。在延迟胆囊切除术的患者中,18.3%的患者至少有1次胆总管结石(CBDS)复发,38.6%的患者在胆囊切除术前有任何胆囊结石相关事件复发。这些事件均未发生在索引组中。首次诊断为结石性疾病后,CBDS和其他胆道事件的复发率没有差异。结论:胆总管清除术后同一时间行胆囊切除术是安全的,即使对患有合并症的老年人也是如此。与延迟胆囊切除术相比,它与不良结果无关,并可能预防了胆道事件的复发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
8.00%
发文量
120
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The mission of CJS is to contribute to the meaningful continuing medical education of Canadian surgical specialists, and to provide surgeons with an effective vehicle for the dissemination of observations in the areas of clinical and basic science research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信