Implementation of a Multidisciplinary Medication Refill Protocol.

PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.) Pub Date : 2023-09-11 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.22454/PRiMER.2023.418724
Samia Khan, Jessica J F Kram, Dennis J Baumgardner, Amanda G Sessions, Patrick Foss, Carl Bellinger, Fabiana Kotovicz
{"title":"Implementation of a Multidisciplinary Medication Refill Protocol.","authors":"Samia Khan,&nbsp;Jessica J F Kram,&nbsp;Dennis J Baumgardner,&nbsp;Amanda G Sessions,&nbsp;Patrick Foss,&nbsp;Carl Bellinger,&nbsp;Fabiana Kotovicz","doi":"10.22454/PRiMER.2023.418724","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Primary care clinicians spend significant time managing nonvisit activities, including processing of requests for prescription renewal. Delays in processing refills may lead to patient dissatisfaction and impact provider productivity. Having nonclinicians process refills can be more efficient and time-saving. We aimed to evaluate the use of a multidisciplinary medication refill protocol to decrease the time to complete refill requests.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We implemented nursing<b>-</b>driven management of refill requests within two family medicine residency clinics in Milwaukee, Wisconsin (Phase 1: single clinic implementation [March 2017-June 2019]; Phase 2: added second clinic prepandemic [June 2019-March 2020] and postpandemic [April 2020-December 2020]). The multidisciplinary refill protocol was created by faculty, residents, pharmacy, and nursing. Data were collected using electronic health record time stamps to determine when refill requests were initiated and filled by faculty, residents, and nurses. We used Mood's median test to compare the median time for medication refill completion. We used Levene's test to test for equal variance surrounding the median of each caregiver group. We used Fisher's exact test or χ<sup>2</sup> test with Yates' correction for 2×2 contingency tables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In both phases, we identified a significant reduction in median time to refill completion ( <i>P</i><.001) and variability of time to refill completion ( <i>P</i><.001). Notably, in Phase 1, reduction in median refill time was most apparent among residents (383 vs 79 min postimplementation); and in Phase 2, the percentage of refills completed within 48 hours significantly increased between the pre-COVID-19 and COVID-19 pandemic among faculty and nursing in Clinic 1 and residents and faculty in Clinic 2 (all <i>P</i>'s<.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Implementation of a multidisciplinary refill protocol significantly improved time and predictability of refill completion in both phases.</p>","PeriodicalId":74494,"journal":{"name":"PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.)","volume":"7 ","pages":"31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10544644/pdf/primer-7-31.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22454/PRiMER.2023.418724","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Primary care clinicians spend significant time managing nonvisit activities, including processing of requests for prescription renewal. Delays in processing refills may lead to patient dissatisfaction and impact provider productivity. Having nonclinicians process refills can be more efficient and time-saving. We aimed to evaluate the use of a multidisciplinary medication refill protocol to decrease the time to complete refill requests.

Methods: We implemented nursing-driven management of refill requests within two family medicine residency clinics in Milwaukee, Wisconsin (Phase 1: single clinic implementation [March 2017-June 2019]; Phase 2: added second clinic prepandemic [June 2019-March 2020] and postpandemic [April 2020-December 2020]). The multidisciplinary refill protocol was created by faculty, residents, pharmacy, and nursing. Data were collected using electronic health record time stamps to determine when refill requests were initiated and filled by faculty, residents, and nurses. We used Mood's median test to compare the median time for medication refill completion. We used Levene's test to test for equal variance surrounding the median of each caregiver group. We used Fisher's exact test or χ2 test with Yates' correction for 2×2 contingency tables.

Results: In both phases, we identified a significant reduction in median time to refill completion ( P<.001) and variability of time to refill completion ( P<.001). Notably, in Phase 1, reduction in median refill time was most apparent among residents (383 vs 79 min postimplementation); and in Phase 2, the percentage of refills completed within 48 hours significantly increased between the pre-COVID-19 and COVID-19 pandemic among faculty and nursing in Clinic 1 and residents and faculty in Clinic 2 (all P's<.001).

Conclusions: Implementation of a multidisciplinary refill protocol significantly improved time and predictability of refill completion in both phases.

多学科药物补充方案的实施。
引言:初级保健临床医生花费大量时间管理非就诊活动,包括处理处方续期请求。重新灌装处理的延迟可能会导致患者不满,并影响供应商的生产力。让非临床医生进行再填充可以更高效、更省时。我们旨在评估多学科药物补充方案的使用,以减少完成补充请求的时间。方法:我们在威斯康星州密尔沃基的两个家庭医学住院诊所内实施了护理驱动的补充请求管理(第一阶段:单诊所实施【2017年3月至2019年6月】;第二阶段:增加第二诊所,即疫情前【2019年6日至2020年3月】和疫情后【2020年4月至2020年12月】)。多学科补充方案由教员、住院医师、药房和护理人员创建。使用电子健康记录时间戳收集数据,以确定教员、住院医师和护士何时发起并填写补充请求。我们使用Mood的中位数测试来比较药物补充完成的中位数时间。我们使用Levene检验来检验每个护理者组的中位数是否存在相等的方差。我们对2×2列联表使用Fisher精确检验或χ2检验和Yates校正。结果:在这两个阶段,我们都发现中位再填充完成时间显著缩短(PPP的结论:多学科再填充方案的实施显著改善了两个阶段再填充完成的时间和可预测性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信