Comparison of the Arterial PaCO 2 Values and ETCO 2 Values Measured with Sidestream Capnography in Patients with a Prediagnosis of COPD Exacerbation.

Avicenna Journal of Medicine Pub Date : 2023-07-13 eCollection Date: 2023-07-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0043-1771179
Gökhan İşat, Tuba Cimilli Öztürk, Özge Ecmel Onur, Serdar Özdemir, Ebru Ünal Akoğlu, Fatma Tokgöz Akyıl, Hacer Kuzu Okur
{"title":"Comparison of the Arterial PaCO <sub>2</sub> Values and ETCO <sub>2</sub> Values Measured with Sidestream Capnography in Patients with a Prediagnosis of COPD Exacerbation.","authors":"Gökhan İşat,&nbsp;Tuba Cimilli Öztürk,&nbsp;Özge Ecmel Onur,&nbsp;Serdar Özdemir,&nbsp;Ebru Ünal Akoğlu,&nbsp;Fatma Tokgöz Akyıl,&nbsp;Hacer Kuzu Okur","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1771179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>  Aim of this study is to investigate whether end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO <sub>2</sub> ) values can be used instead of partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO <sub>2</sub> ) values in guiding treatment, and determining treatment benefits in patients that received a pre-diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbation at the emergency department. <b>Methods</b>  This observational prospective study was conducted with patients who presented to the emergency department with the complaint of shortness of breath and were diagnosed with COPD exacerbation. ETCO <sub>2</sub> was measured with the sidestream method during blood gas analysis in patients with indications for this analysis. Measurements were repeated at hour 1 after treatment. <b>Results</b>  The study included a total of 121 cases. There was a positive correlation between the PaCO <sub>2</sub> and ETCO <sub>2</sub> values measured before and after treatment ( <i>r</i>  = 0.736, <i>p</i>  < 0.01 and <i>r</i>  = 0.883, <i>p</i>  < 0.01, respectively). High ETCO <sub>2</sub> values were accompanied by high PaCO <sub>2</sub> values. When the measurements before and after treatment were evaluated using the Bland-Altman method, most of the result were within the limits of agreement (-4.9 and +31.4/- 2.6 and +9.4), with mean differences being calculated as 13.2 and 8.4, respectively. <b>Conclusions</b>  Although ETCO <sub>2</sub> and PaCO <sub>2</sub> were statistically consistent according to the results of our study, due to the high averages of differences between these two parameters, the ETCO <sub>2</sub> value has limited clinical use in COPD cases compared to PaCO <sub>2</sub> . However, high ETCO <sub>2</sub> values may indicate that noninvasive mechanical ventilation should be included in the treatment of COPD cases without waiting for the results of blood gas analysis, and they can also be when needed for inpatient treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":32889,"journal":{"name":"Avicenna Journal of Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10550360/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Avicenna Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1771179","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background  Aim of this study is to investigate whether end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO 2 ) values can be used instead of partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO 2 ) values in guiding treatment, and determining treatment benefits in patients that received a pre-diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbation at the emergency department. Methods  This observational prospective study was conducted with patients who presented to the emergency department with the complaint of shortness of breath and were diagnosed with COPD exacerbation. ETCO 2 was measured with the sidestream method during blood gas analysis in patients with indications for this analysis. Measurements were repeated at hour 1 after treatment. Results  The study included a total of 121 cases. There was a positive correlation between the PaCO 2 and ETCO 2 values measured before and after treatment ( r  = 0.736, p  < 0.01 and r  = 0.883, p  < 0.01, respectively). High ETCO 2 values were accompanied by high PaCO 2 values. When the measurements before and after treatment were evaluated using the Bland-Altman method, most of the result were within the limits of agreement (-4.9 and +31.4/- 2.6 and +9.4), with mean differences being calculated as 13.2 and 8.4, respectively. Conclusions  Although ETCO 2 and PaCO 2 were statistically consistent according to the results of our study, due to the high averages of differences between these two parameters, the ETCO 2 value has limited clinical use in COPD cases compared to PaCO 2 . However, high ETCO 2 values may indicate that noninvasive mechanical ventilation should be included in the treatment of COPD cases without waiting for the results of blood gas analysis, and they can also be when needed for inpatient treatment.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

侧流式二氧化碳描记术测定COPD患者动脉PaCO2值和ETCO2值的比较。
背景 本研究的目的是研究是否可以使用呼气末二氧化碳(ETCO 2)值代替二氧化碳分压(PaCO 2)来指导治疗,并确定在急诊科接受慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)恶化预诊断的患者的治疗益处。方法 这项观察性前瞻性研究是对因呼吸急促而到急诊科就诊并被诊断为COPD恶化的患者进行的。在有分析指征的患者的血气分析过程中,用侧流法测量ETCO 2。在治疗后第1小时重复测量。后果 该研究共包括121例病例。治疗前后PaCO2和ETCO2值呈正相关(r = 0.736,p r = 0.883,p 2值伴随着较高的PaCO2值。当使用Bland-Altman方法评估治疗前后的测量结果时,大多数结果都在一致性范围内(-4.9和+31.4/- 2.6和+9.4),平均差异分别计算为13.2和8.4。结论 尽管根据我们的研究结果,ETCO 2和PaCO 2在统计学上是一致的,但由于这两个参数之间的差异平均值很高,与PaCO 2相比,ETCO值在COPD病例中的临床应用有限。然而,高ETCO 2值可能表明,无创机械通气应纳入COPD病例的治疗,而无需等待血气分析结果,也可以在需要住院治疗时纳入。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
26 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信