The impact of bacterial superinfections on the outcome of critically ill patients with COVID-19 associated acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) - a single-centre, observational cohort study.

IF 1.6 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Justyna Sysiak-Sławecka, Oksana Wichowska, Paweł Piwowarczyk, Michał Borys
{"title":"The impact of bacterial superinfections on the outcome of critically ill patients with COVID-19 associated acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) - a single-centre, observational cohort study.","authors":"Justyna Sysiak-Sławecka,&nbsp;Oksana Wichowska,&nbsp;Paweł Piwowarczyk,&nbsp;Michał Borys","doi":"10.5114/ait.2023.130833","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Bacterial superinfections are common in severely ill COVID-19 patients and could be associated with a significant increase in morbidity and mortality.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>We assessed 29 critically ill patients treated in a university hospital's intensive care unit (ICU). Each patient required mechanical ventilation due to COVID-19-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Fifteen patients who required venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) support (ECMO group) were compared to a control group (CON group) of 14 individuals without ECMO. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of superinfection in both studied groups. Moreover, we evaluated mortality, length of stay in the ICU, positive culture results, antibiotics used during treatment, and the impact of immunomodulatory drugs on secondary infections.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We did not find a difference in the number of superinfections between the ECMO and CON groups (11 vs. 10, P = 1.0). The mortality rate was 67% in the ECMO group and 64% in the CON group ( P = 1.0). The patients in both groups had similar numbers of positive culture results and days in the ICU prior to the detection of a positive culture. Antibiotics were administered to ten patients in the ECMO and eight patients in the CON group. The mortality rate was 81% in patients with superinfection versus 25% in those without co-infection ( P = 0.009). We found a negative impact of urea concentration on mortality in our cohort, with an odds ratio of 0.942 (0.891-0.996, P = 0.034).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results suggest that bacterial superinfection in COVID-19 patients negatively impacted survival in the ICU. VV-ECMO support in COVID-19 patients does not seem to improve the outcomes of patients with severe ARDS.</p>","PeriodicalId":7750,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesiology intensive therapy","volume":"55 3","pages":"163-167"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/f6/b6/AIT-55-51320.PMC10496093.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesiology intensive therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/ait.2023.130833","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Bacterial superinfections are common in severely ill COVID-19 patients and could be associated with a significant increase in morbidity and mortality.

Material and methods: We assessed 29 critically ill patients treated in a university hospital's intensive care unit (ICU). Each patient required mechanical ventilation due to COVID-19-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Fifteen patients who required venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) support (ECMO group) were compared to a control group (CON group) of 14 individuals without ECMO. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of superinfection in both studied groups. Moreover, we evaluated mortality, length of stay in the ICU, positive culture results, antibiotics used during treatment, and the impact of immunomodulatory drugs on secondary infections.

Results: We did not find a difference in the number of superinfections between the ECMO and CON groups (11 vs. 10, P = 1.0). The mortality rate was 67% in the ECMO group and 64% in the CON group ( P = 1.0). The patients in both groups had similar numbers of positive culture results and days in the ICU prior to the detection of a positive culture. Antibiotics were administered to ten patients in the ECMO and eight patients in the CON group. The mortality rate was 81% in patients with superinfection versus 25% in those without co-infection ( P = 0.009). We found a negative impact of urea concentration on mortality in our cohort, with an odds ratio of 0.942 (0.891-0.996, P = 0.034).

Conclusions: Our results suggest that bacterial superinfection in COVID-19 patients negatively impacted survival in the ICU. VV-ECMO support in COVID-19 patients does not seem to improve the outcomes of patients with severe ARDS.

细菌重叠感染对新冠肺炎相关急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)危重患者结局的影响——一项单中心观察性队列研究。
简介:细菌重叠感染在重症新冠肺炎患者中很常见,可能与发病率和死亡率的显著增加有关。材料和方法:我们评估了在大学医院重症监护室(ICU)接受治疗的29名危重患者。由于COVID-19诱导的急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS),每位患者都需要机械通气。将15名需要静脉-静脉体外膜肺氧合(VV-ECMO)支持的患者(ECMO组)与14名未使用ECMO的患者的对照组(CON组)进行比较。本研究旨在评估两个研究组中重叠感染的患病率。此外,我们评估了死亡率、ICU住院时间、阳性培养结果、治疗期间使用的抗生素以及免疫调节药物对继发感染的影响。结果:我们没有发现ECMO组和CON组之间的重叠感染数量有差异(11对10,P=1.0)。ECMO组的死亡率为67%,CON组为64%(P=0.0)。两组患者在检测到阳性培养物之前的阳性培养结果和ICU天数相似。ECMO组的10名患者和CON组的8名患者服用了抗生素。重叠感染患者的死亡率为81%,而无合并感染患者的病死率为25%(P=0.009)。我们发现尿素浓度对我们队列的死亡率有负面影响,比值比为0.942(0.891-0.996,P=0.034)。结论:我们的结果表明,新冠肺炎患者的细菌重叠感染对ICU的存活率有负面影响。对新冠肺炎患者的VV-ECMO支持似乎并不能改善严重ARDS患者的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
48
审稿时长
25 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信