An In Vitro Study of the Effects of Mechanical and Enzymatic Isolation of Stromal Vascular Fraction on Wound Healing.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Lien-Guo Dai, Nien-Chi Huang, Lan-Ya Kang, Keng-Yen Fu, Pai-Shan Hsieh, Niann-Tzyy Dai
{"title":"An In Vitro Study of the Effects of Mechanical and Enzymatic Isolation of Stromal Vascular Fraction on Wound Healing.","authors":"Lien-Guo Dai,&nbsp;Nien-Chi Huang,&nbsp;Lan-Ya Kang,&nbsp;Keng-Yen Fu,&nbsp;Pai-Shan Hsieh,&nbsp;Niann-Tzyy Dai","doi":"10.1097/SAP.0000000000003087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>The adipose-derived stromal vascular fraction (SVF) is considered to be an attractive source of stem cells in cell therapy. Besides stem cells, it also contains functional cells, such as macrophages, precursor cells, somatic stem cells, and pericytes. Collagenase digestion is the most frequently used method to isolate SVF, but it is time-consuming and costly and has some problems, such as infectious agents and immune reactions. In this research, we compared the yield, cell population ratios, and cell viability when isolating SVF by the ultrasonic physics (U-SVF) method and traditional enzymatic method (E-SVF). Then, we isolated exosomes from U-SVF and E-SVF, respectively, and cocultured them with fibroblasts to investigate the potential of applying this cell secretion in wound repair. The results showed that there was no significant difference between the ultrasonic method and enzymatic method in terms of cell viability, cell numbers, or the expression of CD markers of stem cells. However, exosome analysis identified a greater number and smaller size of exosome particles obtained by U-SVF. In terms of cell proliferation efficiency, although the proliferation efficiency of U-SVF was lower than that of E-SVF. Trilineage differentiation experiments revealed that both E-SVF and U-SVF had good differentiation ability, owing to high stem cell content. Finally, E-SVF and U-SVF exosomes were cocultured with fibroblasts. The efficiency of fibroblast migration increased in the SVF exosome treated groups, and the expression of related genes (integrin α5β1) was slightly upregulated; however, the expression of FAK, AKT, ERK, and RhoA was significantly upregulated at 24 hours. From the abovementioned experiments, we found that there was no significant difference in stem cell-related characteristics between SVF isolated by ultrasonic cavitation and SVF isolated by the enzymatic method. In addition, exosomes secreted by SVF may have excellent therapeutic effect on skin injuries, which provides a new viewpoint and therapeutic strategy for soft tissue repair.</p>","PeriodicalId":8060,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","volume":"88 1s Suppl 1","pages":"S13-S21"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000003087","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: The adipose-derived stromal vascular fraction (SVF) is considered to be an attractive source of stem cells in cell therapy. Besides stem cells, it also contains functional cells, such as macrophages, precursor cells, somatic stem cells, and pericytes. Collagenase digestion is the most frequently used method to isolate SVF, but it is time-consuming and costly and has some problems, such as infectious agents and immune reactions. In this research, we compared the yield, cell population ratios, and cell viability when isolating SVF by the ultrasonic physics (U-SVF) method and traditional enzymatic method (E-SVF). Then, we isolated exosomes from U-SVF and E-SVF, respectively, and cocultured them with fibroblasts to investigate the potential of applying this cell secretion in wound repair. The results showed that there was no significant difference between the ultrasonic method and enzymatic method in terms of cell viability, cell numbers, or the expression of CD markers of stem cells. However, exosome analysis identified a greater number and smaller size of exosome particles obtained by U-SVF. In terms of cell proliferation efficiency, although the proliferation efficiency of U-SVF was lower than that of E-SVF. Trilineage differentiation experiments revealed that both E-SVF and U-SVF had good differentiation ability, owing to high stem cell content. Finally, E-SVF and U-SVF exosomes were cocultured with fibroblasts. The efficiency of fibroblast migration increased in the SVF exosome treated groups, and the expression of related genes (integrin α5β1) was slightly upregulated; however, the expression of FAK, AKT, ERK, and RhoA was significantly upregulated at 24 hours. From the abovementioned experiments, we found that there was no significant difference in stem cell-related characteristics between SVF isolated by ultrasonic cavitation and SVF isolated by the enzymatic method. In addition, exosomes secreted by SVF may have excellent therapeutic effect on skin injuries, which provides a new viewpoint and therapeutic strategy for soft tissue repair.

基质血管部分的机械和酶分离对伤口愈合影响的体外研究。
摘要:脂肪来源的基质血管部分(SVF)被认为是细胞治疗中有吸引力的干细胞来源。除了干细胞,它还含有功能细胞,如巨噬细胞、前体细胞、体细胞干细胞和周细胞。胶原酶消化是分离SVF最常用的方法,但它耗时、成本高,并且存在一些问题,如感染源和免疫反应。在本研究中,我们比较了超声物理法(U-SVF)和传统酶法(E-SVF)分离SVF时的产量、细胞群体比率和细胞活力。然后,我们分别从U-SVF和E-SVF中分离出外泌体,并将其与成纤维细胞共培养,以研究将这种细胞分泌应用于伤口修复的潜力。结果表明,超声法和酶法在细胞活力、细胞数量或干细胞CD标记物表达方面没有显著差异。然而,外泌体分析发现U-SVF获得的外泌体颗粒数量更多,尺寸更小。在细胞增殖效率方面,尽管U-SVF的增殖效率低于E-SVF。三系分化实验表明,由于干细胞含量高,E-SVF和U-SVF都具有良好的分化能力。最后,将E-SVF和U-SVF外泌体与成纤维细胞共培养。SVF外泌体处理组的成纤维细胞迁移效率增加,相关基因(整合素α5β1)的表达略有上调;然而,FAK、AKT、ERK和RhoA的表达在24小时时显著上调。从上述实验中,我们发现通过超声空化分离的SVF和通过酶法分离的SVF在干细胞相关特性上没有显著差异。此外,SVF分泌的外泌体可能对皮肤损伤具有良好的治疗作用,为软组织修复提供了新的视角和治疗策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
13.30%
发文量
584
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The only independent journal devoted to general plastic and reconstructive surgery, Annals of Plastic Surgery serves as a forum for current scientific and clinical advances in the field and a sounding board for ideas and perspectives on its future. The journal publishes peer-reviewed original articles, brief communications, case reports, and notes in all areas of interest to the practicing plastic surgeon. There are also historical and current reviews, descriptions of surgical technique, and lively editorials and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信